Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 03/17/2025 in all areas
-
6 pointsTrump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump
-
4 pointsAs much as the left has TDS. The right is just as bad This man has made the world go crazy and I don't understand it
-
2 pointsYou guys have been royally screwed over by your sources. They are not feeding you accurate information, and their predictions suck. Maybe you should find some better ones. The auto pen thing is a big deal. Expect to see the pardons fail to protect the criminals. Why wouldn't you want to see criminals who committed crimes at the highest level brought to justice anyway? Just because Trump wants them prosecuted, you would rather see them go free as an FU to Trump? Come on. Leave your TDS at the door for a few minutes each day. It will probably lengthen your life span.
-
2 points
-
2 pointsI was coming here to post this. You are wrong. These signatures along with basically every document signed was done by auto pen. If the president wasn't capable of signing his name, why would you trust anything that was approved in the name of Joe Biden? This is a big deal. You just haven't been told it is yet by your sources.
-
2 pointsNo worries, thanks for doing it. Also, please put my $100 towards future tourneys.
-
2 points
-
1 pointAnother broken libtard alias.
-
1 pointAs a matter of fact, I did feel better. I wish liberals could experience the joy that us Trump voters feel. It would change your life. If a president actually sings the document, no it doesn't need to all be on camera. That's not the point. The point is that auto pen was used, so the president didn't sign it. Why is this going over your head? To add to the fact Biden didn't actually sign the document, there may have been documente he wasn't even aware of that were signed using the president's authority. Doesn't that concern you? That people were in the shadows using the president's power unbeknownst to him since he was basically incapacitated for the majority of his term? Do I really need to lay this out so thoroughly for you to understand what the ramifications of this accusation means?
-
1 point
-
1 pointNot only are the pardons VOID, but the people that used the autopen are going to be arrested and imprisoned too! So much WINNNING!
-
1 point
-
1 pointI'm not going to make a list of the people who would rather attack the messenger because they can't dispute the facts of the message. This thread makes that pretty self-evident.
-
1 point
-
1 pointWhy would anyone be so supportive of the pardons? If they didn’t do anything wrong, they wouldn’t need them.
-
1 point
-
1 pointGood win Dain. For real this time. Bhatia had so many makeable putts on the back, and most of them were nowhere near the hole.
-
1 pointI know people who live in that area. They are so thankful those bastards were cleaned out of there. People were moving out and property values were plummeting.
-
1 pointThe NBA needed the Lakers and Lebron to have a shot. It wasnt a real trade.
-
1 pointSaints used to somewhat normal and now he is batschiiit crazy with severe TDS
-
1 point
-
1 pointOnly I haven't seen anyone here argue that a singular person can't be good who grew up there. You're making the argument because one such person can exist, others exist (I agree), and that we should welcome larger numbers of them because of that. Your goal line to cross for your argument to succeed is way shorter in your mind than where it should be. The problem is that large numbers, I'd argue the vast majority of Palestinians, believe in things that are harmful to the United States and the West at large. You cannot vet them to know who has managed to escape that mentality despite the upbringing in that environment. So if you accept larger numbers of them, you are naturally going to get disproportionately larger numbers of people who are problems to our society at large. Knowing one such exception to the rule does not make your argument valid. The belief we should save our country and culture from that damage and possible destruction isn't racist or bigoted, it has nothing at all to do with skin color. It has everything to do with our way of life and beliefs. If we accept your friend is one of the exceptions, I'd have no problem with many like him living here. But the problem is you can't tell me from a subset of 100 Palestinians who want to come here which are like him and which are not, who only wants to escape the poverty and strife they are in. Yet they believe the West is evil, violence against those ideals is justified, and have had it ingrained in them since birth and will raise their children to believe the same. I could see the argument if those elements were the minority of that population, but polling of beliefs and what we see unfolding in Europe shows us that isn't the case. I'm not willing to drive our society off a cliff to feel better about ourselves that we weren't racist or bigots in the eyes of some because these people who wish us harm happen to be a different skin color or ethnicity. I don't give anyone a pass for that because they happen to be a different skin color, your skin color, my skin color, whatever their skin color I don't want them here.
-
1 point
-
1 pointImagine cucking for this South African fake dudebro tech doosh and also trying to say pro Palestinian protests on campus threaten Jews. You’d have to be the vacant shell of a man.
-
1 point