eaglesfreak 10 Posted August 30, 2010 Team A gives Ronnie Brown, Hines Ward, Miles Austin and VJAX Team B gives Wayne,Ryan Mathews,Sidney Rice,and Maroney????? I dont get it This is a 12 team PPR league Team A has gore mccoy and ronnie brown...If he traded mccoy instead of brown then it would have been even to a degree...Rice will be back week 8 where Vjax will prob miss remainder of season...thoughts? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mobb_deep 919 Posted August 30, 2010 I think you're dumb. ETA: you're also a cry baby. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KSB2424 3,087 Posted August 30, 2010 I'm still trying to figure which side I like better. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RSersen 0 Posted August 30, 2010 Maybe Team A just doesn't trust an injury prone Ronnie Brown, and really likes Matthews. Maybe Team B really doesn't like Wayne this year (neither do I), and wants Austin instead. Maybe Team B thinks Jackson won't be out the entire season, and thinks he'll get a steal by giving up a receiver that definitely will be out at least half the year. No veto. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 5,977 Posted August 30, 2010 1. This isn't a lopsided trade. 2. Even if it was a lopsided trade, collusion is still the only reason to veto. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
djrockstar 0 Posted August 30, 2010 I agree with KSB. Who is getting the better deal here? And that's besides the point really. You only veto if there's collusion. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sirensong 111 Posted August 30, 2010 lopsided? i see a swap of puzzle pieces with similar players: brown (conservative) for matthews (aggressive). brown was the #2 FF RB in the league when he went down last season. matthews is in a great situation with a great skillset. wayne (conservative) for austin (aggressive). both tier 1 guys, both with some question marks--was austin a 1 season wonder? has wayne been a wonder for too many seasons? VJAX for rice. both players are going to miss substantial time, and both might be lost as serious FF producers for the season. push. so the only real question is maroney for hines ward. this is the best kind of trade, because both teams are trying to improve in different ways. team B gets ward--a conservative move for a solid PPR player. team A gets maroney, who put up serious points in the second half of last season. how anyone could look at this as a particularly lopsided trade, much less a potentially veto-able trade, is beyond me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FlaHawker 24 Posted August 30, 2010 trade vetos? already? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
schmitty34 2 Posted August 30, 2010 Looks like a very well thought out and even trade. Both owners are probably happy about it, and excited about how it will improve their team. So in that case, to be fair to every other owner, you should probably veto the trade.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nadnewob 1 Posted August 30, 2010 First of all, any league that allows trade vetoes should be disbanded. 2nd, this is an incredibly even trade. 3rd, your a douche and a cry baby. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimHauck 1,883 Posted August 30, 2010 Who trades half of their roster right after the draft? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ralphster 274 Posted August 30, 2010 Even trade. No veto. Reassess your FF opinions/projections/skills bro. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JT 137 Posted August 30, 2010 First of all, any league that allows trade vetoes should be disbanded. 2nd, this is an incredibly even trade. 3rd, your a douche and a cry baby. Agreed, except it's "you're". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brtdud7 0 Posted August 30, 2010 if it was a keeper league, possibly Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Snoopy 0 Posted August 30, 2010 No collusion -> No veto Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jeffkomlo 19 Posted August 30, 2010 if it was a keeper league, possibly Start 2 QB league it's a veto Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kanil 520 Posted August 30, 2010 1. This isn't a lopsided trade. 2. Even if it was a lopsided trade, collusion is still the only reason to veto. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tecklc2112 7 Posted August 30, 2010 Team A gives Ronnie Brown, Hines Ward, Miles Austin and VJAX Team B gives Wayne,Ryan Mathews,Sidney Rice,and Maroney????? I dont get it This is a 12 team PPR league Team A has gore mccoy and ronnie brown...If he traded mccoy instead of brown then it would have been even to a degree...Rice will be back week 8 where Vjax will prob miss remainder of season...thoughts? How is this lopsided??? GET A CLUE. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mobb_deep 919 Posted August 30, 2010 veto your life Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Blaneyfan 0 Posted August 30, 2010 Could be a long year for you dude if you are whining about that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DEEZNUTS 18 Posted August 30, 2010 No such thing as a vetoable trade - ESPECIALLY before the season starts! Is someone intentionally tanking their season a week before the first kickoff?? Just because you wouldn't personally make that trade doesn't make it vetoable. Wow. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Flgatorguy87 160 Posted August 31, 2010 Looked at it for 5 minutes and decided I would have to see the whole roster to see which I liked better. Guess thats a no Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
the_future420 3 Posted August 31, 2010 OP should be punched in the face infront of his family. How the hell could he even consider this a vetoable trade? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SUXBNME 1,362 Posted August 31, 2010 No way in hell is that a fair trade. Veto it immediately !!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
t-birdie 8 Posted August 31, 2010 I honestly have no idea which side is supposed to be ripping off the other. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
t-birdie 8 Posted August 31, 2010 Throw out Jackson, Rice, and Maroney as speculative garbage. It's a RB2, WR2, and WR1 for a WR1, RB1/2. Very even trade. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bunky211 0 Posted August 31, 2010 I agree with the prior douche statement. Which side are you saying it's even lobsided on? Douche. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gocolts 300 Posted August 31, 2010 I'm still trying to figure which side I like better. veto your life Could be a long year for you dude if you are whining about that. No such thing as a vetoable trade - ESPECIALLY before the season starts! Is someone intentionally tanking their season a week before the first kickoff?? Just because you wouldn't personally make that trade doesn't make it vetoable. Wow. POW!!! OP should be punched in the face infront of his family. How the hell could he even consider this a vetoable trade? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
myjimmy1 0 Posted August 31, 2010 Dont see a problem Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brian Bozworth Fan Club 0 Posted August 31, 2010 No collusion = No Veto Lopsided trade or not, let team owners manage their teams. Good commissioners don't micro manage their league. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rocco91 0 Posted August 31, 2010 Its been said but I dont know which side I would take at this pt = no veto Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RaiderHaters Revenge 3,661 Posted August 31, 2010 im just ###### curious as to how switching Mccoy for Brown makes it more fair? I have Mccoy and Ronnie ranked right next to each other exactly in a ppr OP is a douche, obviously, he wont even step back in here Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 3,553 Posted August 31, 2010 I heart you guys..... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SUXBNME 1,362 Posted August 31, 2010 ABORTION!!!! Oh my Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
schmitty34 2 Posted August 31, 2010 This thread has some good stuff! I wonder what the OP is thinking when he reads the responses. Please check back with us and let us know Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
phillybear 365 Posted August 31, 2010 You know what you have to do. Find out where each owner lives. Kill their pets. Have sex with their furniture. Have sex with dead pets. Burn their house down to the ground. Now it's time to get angry and do something about the trade. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Big Blue 06 195 Posted August 31, 2010 I'm still trying to figure which side I like better. Seriously, I stared at the opening post for about 3 minutes trying to figure out which side was supposed to be lopsided. I'm still not sure which team is getting the better deal. Also, if you're the commish, the ONLY reason to veto a trade is clear collusion. People get ripped off all the time, it's part of the fun of the game. So wash the sand out of your vag1na and try to relax a bit. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites