Is this a vetoable trade?

[eaglesfreak 10]

Team A gives Ronnie Brown, Hines Ward, Miles Austin and VJAX Team B gives Wayne,Ryan Mathews,Sidney Rice,and Maroney?????

 

I dont get it

 

This is a 12 team PPR league

 

Team A has gore mccoy and ronnie brown...If he traded mccoy instead of brown then it would have been even to a degree...Rice will be back week 8 where Vjax will prob miss remainder of season...thoughts?

[mobb_deep 917]

I think you're dumb.

 

ETA: you're also a cry baby.

[KSB2424 3,083]

I'm still trying to figure which side I like better.

[RSersen 0]

Maybe Team A just doesn't trust an injury prone Ronnie Brown, and really likes Matthews.

 

Maybe Team B really doesn't like Wayne this year (neither do I), and wants Austin instead.

 

Maybe Team B thinks Jackson won't be out the entire season, and thinks he'll get a steal by giving up a receiver that definitely will be out at least half the year.

 

No veto.

[kutulu 1,548]

no.

[MDC 5,893]

1. This isn't a lopsided trade.

 

2. Even if it was a lopsided trade, collusion is still the only reason to veto.

[djrockstar 0]

I agree with KSB. Who is getting the better deal here?

 

And that's besides the point really. You only veto if there's collusion.

[sirensong 111]

lopsided? i see a swap of puzzle pieces with similar players:

 

brown (conservative) for matthews (aggressive). brown was the #2 FF RB in the league when he went down last season. matthews is in a great situation with a great skillset.

 

wayne (conservative) for austin (aggressive). both tier 1 guys, both with some question marks--was austin a 1 season wonder? has wayne been a wonder for too many seasons?

 

VJAX for rice. both players are going to miss substantial time, and both might be lost as serious FF producers for the season. push.

 

so the only real question is maroney for hines ward. this is the best kind of trade, because both teams are trying to improve in different ways. team B gets ward--a conservative move for a solid PPR player. team A gets maroney, who put up serious points in the second half of last season.

 

 

 

how anyone could look at this as a particularly lopsided trade, much less a potentially veto-able trade, is beyond me.

[FlaHawker 24]

trade vetos? already?

[schmitty34 2]

Looks like a very well thought out and even trade. Both owners are probably happy about it, and excited about how it will improve their team.

 

So in that case, to be fair to every other owner, you should probably veto the trade....

[nadnewob 1]

First of all, any league that allows trade vetoes should be disbanded. 2nd, this is an incredibly even trade. 3rd, your a douche and a cry baby.

[TimHauck 1,801]

Who trades half of their roster right after the draft?

[ralphster 274]

Even trade. No veto. Reassess your FF opinions/projections/skills bro.

[Beamers 0]

NO, NO and NO

[JT 137]

First of all, any league that allows trade vetoes should be disbanded. 2nd, this is an incredibly even trade. 3rd, your a douche and a cry baby.

 

 

Agreed, except it's "you're".

[brtdud7 0]

if it was a keeper league, possibly

[Snoopy 0]

No collusion -> No veto

[jeffkomlo 19]

if it was a keeper league, possibly

 

Start 2 QB league it's a veto

[Kanil 519]

1. This isn't a lopsided trade.

 

2. Even if it was a lopsided trade, collusion is still the only reason to veto.

[tecklc2112 7]

Team A gives Ronnie Brown, Hines Ward, Miles Austin and VJAX Team B gives Wayne,Ryan Mathews,Sidney Rice,and Maroney?????

 

I dont get it

 

This is a 12 team PPR league

 

Team A has gore mccoy and ronnie brown...If he traded mccoy instead of brown then it would have been even to a degree...Rice will be back week 8 where Vjax will prob miss remainder of season...thoughts?

 

How is this lopsided??? GET A CLUE.

[mobb_deep 917]

veto your life

[Blaneyfan 0]

Could be a long year for you dude if you are whining about that.

[DEEZNUTS 18]

No such thing as a vetoable trade - ESPECIALLY before the season starts! Is someone intentionally tanking their season a week before the first kickoff?? Just because you wouldn't personally make that trade doesn't make it vetoable. Wow.

[Flgatorguy87 160]

Looked at it for 5 minutes and decided I would have to see the whole roster to see which I liked better.

 

Guess thats a no

[the_future420 3]

OP should be punched in the face infront of his family. How the hell could he even consider this a vetoable trade?

[SUXBNME 1,337]

No way in hell is that a fair trade.

 

Veto it immediately !!!

[t-birdie 8]

I honestly have no idea which side is supposed to be ripping off the other.

[t-birdie 8]

Throw out Jackson, Rice, and Maroney as speculative garbage.

 

It's a RB2, WR2, and WR1 for a WR1, RB1/2. Very even trade.

[Bunky211 0]

I agree with the prior douche statement. Which side are you saying it's even lobsided on? Douche.

[gocolts 300]

I'm still trying to figure which side I like better.

 

veto your life

 

Could be a long year for you dude if you are whining about that.

 

No such thing as a vetoable trade - ESPECIALLY before the season starts! Is someone intentionally tanking their season a week before the first kickoff?? Just because you wouldn't personally make that trade doesn't make it vetoable. Wow.

POW!!!

 

OP should be punched in the face infront of his family. How the hell could he even consider this a vetoable trade?

[myjimmy1 0]

Dont see a problem

[Brian Bozworth Fan Club 0]

No collusion = No Veto

 

Lopsided trade or not, let team owners manage their teams. Good commissioners don't micro manage their league.

[rocco91 0]

Its been said but I dont know which side I would take at this pt = no veto

[RaiderHaters Revenge 3,588]

im just ###### curious as to how switching Mccoy for Brown makes it more fair?

 

I have Mccoy and Ronnie ranked right next to each other exactly in a ppr

 

OP is a douche, obviously, he wont even step back in here

[RLLD 3,455]

 

I heart you guys.....

[edjr 5,567]

COLLUSION!!!!

[SUXBNME 1,337]

ABORTION!!!!

 

Oh my

[schmitty34 2]

This thread has some good stuff!

 

I wonder what the OP is thinking when he reads the responses.

 

Please check back with us and let us know

[phillybear 364]

You know what you have to do.

Find out where each owner lives.

Kill their pets.

Have sex with their furniture.

Have sex with dead pets.

Burn their house down to the ground.

Now it's time to get angry and do something about the trade.

[Big Blue 06 195]

I'm still trying to figure which side I like better.

 

Seriously, I stared at the opening post for about 3 minutes trying to figure out which side was supposed to be lopsided. I'm still not sure which team is getting the better deal.

 

Also, if you're the commish, the ONLY reason to veto a trade is clear collusion. People get ripped off all the time, it's part of the fun of the game. So wash the sand out of your vag1na and try to relax a bit.