Jussie Smollett (Empire) claims he was assaulted by MAGA guys.

[The Observer 641]

2 minutes ago, iam90sbaby said:

White flag

Trump wrecking the 50 year low immigration numbers has to be hard for your type to take. Sorry bud.

[iam90sbaby 2,727]

Just now, The Observer said:

Trump wrecking the 50 year low immigration numbers has to be hard for your type to take. Sorry bud.

5 more years man, you’ll be okay. 

[The Observer 641]

Just now, iam90sbaby said:

5 more years man, you’ll be okay. 

I'm just dandy. Thanks.  I hope your boy is ok. He took his signature issue and has turned something Obama had under control into an emergency. Couldn't have possibly f--cked things up worse.

[Alias Detective 1,459]

Back to Jussie having to fake racism...bwahahahah.  The fake noose is legendary.

[JustinCharge 2,397]

I still remember when this broke, FBGs refused to have a thread on it forever and Joe had to start a thread and then sternly warn people to behave in it.  Just totally embarrassing for Joe.

[Fireballer 2,677]

We dont outwardly say we want "open borders"...but when speaking of interior enforcement we just say "whats the point"?  HT is dead on here.

 

[tubby_mcgee 701]

3 hours ago, The Observer said:

I'm just dandy. Thanks.  I hope your boy is ok. He took his signature issue and has turned something Obama had under control into an emergency. Couldn't have possibly f--cked things up worse.

Trump is president. Obama isn't.  Case closed.  Unless you're gonna do something about it? 

......

.......

 

Mmmyeahhhh...didn't think so.  

 

Now go back to supporting murders rapists and terrorists like your beloved Obama and dems. 

[The Observer 641]

13 minutes ago, tubby_mcgee said:

Trump is president. Obama isn't.  Case closed.  Unless you're gonna do something about it? 

......

.......

 

Mmmyeahhhh...didn't think so.  

 

Now go back to supporting murders rapists and terrorists like your beloved Obama and dems. 

You mean the guy in charge when immigration was at a 50 year low?  Yes, my beloved Obama.

[wiffleball 4,797]

The one time you want TrumpCo to be Trumpian - and STILL they disappoint. WTF are the Feds???

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,543]

1 hour ago, The Observer said:

You mean the guy in charge when immigration was at a 50 year low?  Yes, my beloved Obama.

Wow how ignorant. Obama is the first president to include immediate turnback border jumpers in his immigration numbers

even snopes has my back

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/obama-deported-more-people/

[Hardcore troubadour 15,911]

6 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

Wow how ignorant. Obama is the first president to include immediate turnback border jumpers in his immigration numbers

even snopes has my back

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/obama-deported-more-people/

Nice! I knew it all along, the LA times covered it a while ago. But I liked watching Newbie regurgitate more spoon fed bullshit from his owners. Woof woof. 

[TimmySmith 2,783]

10 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Nice! I knew it all along, the LA times covered it a while ago. But I liked watching Newbie regurgitate more spoon fed bullshit from his owners. Woof woof. 

Clinton created detention centers.  They were at their peak of capacity when Trump inherited them from Obama (don't recall hearing any of this from the media).

[Fireballer 2,677]

51 minutes ago, TimmySmith said:

Clinton created detention centers.  They were at their peak of capacity when Trump inherited them from Obama (don't recall hearing any of this from the media).

Orange Man Bad

[The Observer 641]

1 hour ago, TimmySmith said:

Clinton created detention centers.  They were at their peak of capacity when Trump inherited them from Obama (don't recall hearing any of this from the media).

Probably because it's not true

[5-Points 3,766]

13 hours ago, The Observer said:

You mean the guy in charge when immigration was at a 50 year low?  Yes, my beloved Obama.

Record setting numbers of people want in on Trump's record breaking economy. Something Obama didn't have to worry about. 

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

16 hours ago, Alias Detective said:

Back to Jussie having to fake racism...bwahahahah.  The fake noose is legendary.

Top ten Halloween costumes. Subway should offer a free sub if you come in dressed like Jussie or are black with a MAGA hat on.

[TBayXXXVII 2,669]

18 hours ago, The Observer said:

Disagreeing with how Trump wants to handle the border is not calling for open borders. That's a Trump talking point to rile up the same numbskulls that he convinced that they all were rapists and drug dealers.   When Obama left office, illegal immigration was at a nearly 50 year low. It exploded under Trump and is now at a 20 year high.  Trump totally screwed immigration up, and it is his signature issue.

I don't see it that way.  I see it that because the Dems are giving such freedom of mobility and access to our way of life without restricting it, is the very reason there is an influx of illegal immigration.

Trump didn't screw anything up, Congress (primarily, but not only the Democrats), did, and they're (the Democrats), exacerbating it and blaming it on Trump. The real problem with this country right now isn't "Fake News", it truly is the current makeup of the Democrat party, plain and simple.

[The Observer 641]

1 minute ago, TBayXXXVII said:

I don't see it that way.  I see it that because the Dems are giving such freedom of mobility and access to our way of life without restricting it, is the very reason there is an influx of illegal immigration.

Trump didn't screw anything up, Congress (primarily, but not only the Democrats), did, and they're (the Democrats), exacerbating it and blaming it on Trump. The real problem with this country right now isn't "Fake News", it truly is the current makeup of the Democrat party, plain and simple.

Democrats had a deal in place early on in Trump's presidency. 20+ billion for his wall in exchange for protection for the dreamers. Trump turned it down. Trump wants everything his way or the highway. That's not how it works. Democrats agreed on a infrastructure deal too. Trump refused to discuss it when the time came to sit down.  Blaming Democrats for the state of our country is laughable. Trump has misplayed his hand every step of the way and now he can forget getting anything done. He wants to be a king, not a president.

[TimmySmith 2,783]

59 minutes ago, The Observer said:

Probably because it's not true

  Which part? 

[TBayXXXVII 2,669]

7 minutes ago, The Observer said:

Democrats had a deal in place early on in Trump's presidency. 20+ billion for his wall in exchange for protection for the dreamers. Trump turned it down. Trump wants everything his way or the highway. That's not how it works. Democrats agreed on a infrastructure deal too. Trump refused to discuss it when the time came to sit down.  Blaming Democrats for the state of our country is laughable. Trump has misplayed his hand every step of the way and now he can forget getting anything done. He wants to be a king, not a president.

Then I'm laughable then.  If all the Democrat politicians left today and were replaced by Republicans (moderate ones - we don't need the nut jobs from the right either), this country would be humming by the end of Trumps 2024 year.  They are the worst kind of people on this planet, nut just the country.  Oh, and I'm talking about the politicians, not the general public.

[edjr 6,898]

1 minute ago, TBayXXXVII said:

Then I'm laughable then.  If all the Democrat politicians left today and were replaced by Republicans (moderate ones - we don't need the nut jobs from the right either), this country would be humming by the end of Trumps 2024 year.

Humming as in printing more money, sure.

[The Observer 641]

Just now, TBayXXXVII said:

Then I'm laughable then.  If all the Democrat politicians left today and were replaced by Republicans (moderate ones - we don't need the nut jobs from the right either), this country would be humming by the end of Trumps 2024 year.

Unfortunately, the country revolted against Trump in 2018 and created the blue wave in congress. That's how the country works. Of course Trump sheep want all Republicans. Just like the other side would like all Democrats and feel the country would be much better off.

[The Observer 641]

1 minute ago, edjr said:

Humming as in printing more money, sure.

Yup.  Huge debt, and an economy propped up with smoke and mirrors.

[TBayXXXVII 2,669]

Just now, edjr said:

Humming as in printing more money, sure.

Literally, no, but in essence, yes.  Minorities would have more money.  Costs would go down as competition would rise.  Less restrictions would open the market for multiple options for health care.  The borders would be secure and manufacturing would be up.  Wasteful government spending would be down substantially.

[TBayXXXVII 2,669]

2 minutes ago, The Observer said:

Unfortunately, the country revolted against Trump in 2018 and created the blue wave in congress. That's how the country works. Of course Trump sheep want all Republicans. Just like the other side would like all Democrats and feel the country would be much better off.

No it didn't.  Every president lost seats in the house and senate during his first mid-term, not just Trump.  Hell, Obama lost the majority on both sides.  Not only did Trump not lose both sides, he lost less seats than any president in the last 40 years.  He's going to win again in 2020 and the Republicans are going to take back the House.  The Democrats are going too far left and the Independents won't go that far.  There will be a lot more minorities voting red in 2020 than in decades.  Etch that down in stone.

[The Observer 641]

4 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

No it didn't.  Every president lost seats in the house and senate during his first mid-term, not just Trump.  Hell, Obama lost the majority on both sides.  Not only did Trump not lose both sides, he lost less seats than any president in the last 40 years.  He's going to win again in 2020 and the Republicans are going to take back the House.  The Democrats are going too far left and the Independents won't go that far.  There will be a lot more minorities voting red in 2020 than in decades.  Etch that down in stone.

Biggest democratic seat flip since 1974. It was a direct referendum on Trump.  Which was my point. You said if Republicans could take over all political positions blah blah blah.  I was just pointing out that the country seems to be wanting the exact opposite. 

[RLLD 4,275]

I thought I clicked on the Smollett thread....

[TimmySmith 2,783]

10 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

Literally, no, but in essence, yes.  Minorities would have more money.  Costs would go down as competition would rise.  Less restrictions would open the market for multiple options for health care.  The borders would be secure and manufacturing would be up.  Wasteful government spending would be down substantially.

History has shown that more money in the hands of citizens drives the National Debt up.  Recession is the only thing that reverses it.  For a different thread.

[edjr 6,898]

3 minutes ago, RLLD said:

I thought I clicked on the Smollett thread....

I thought you came to FFT

[TimmySmith 2,783]

7 minutes ago, The Observer said:

Biggest democratic seat flip since 1974. It was a direct referendum on Trump.  Which was my point. You said if Republicans could take over all political positions blah blah blah.  I was just pointing out that the country seems to be wanting the exact opposite. 

If you were sane, you would understand that every President's party loses in the 1st mid terms (Obama's got slaughtered), but then he wins re-election.  It's all cyclical.  The whole "referendum" thing doesn't exist. 

[RLLD 4,275]

Just now, edjr said:

I thought you came to FFT

I don’t get it...

[The Observer 641]

3 minutes ago, TimmySmith said:

If you were sane, you would understand that every President's party loses in the 1st mid terms (Obama's got slaughtered), but then he wins re-election.  It's all cyclical.  The whole "referendum" thing doesn't exist. 

Maybe you didn't see the 'biggest blue house flip since 1974' part.  This wasn't business as usual. And I never said it guarantees Trump isn't getting reelected. That has zero to do with my point.

[TimmySmith 2,783]

2 minutes ago, The Observer said:

Maybe you didn't see the 'biggest blue house flip since 1974' part.  This wasn't business as usual. And I never said it guarantees Trump isn't getting reelected. That has zero to do with my point.

 

Republicans picked up 63 House seats in 2010.   Dems picked up 41 seats in 2018.  Find someone who can do the math for you. 

 

[Fireballer 2,677]

19 minutes ago, The Observer said:

 I was just pointing out that the country seems to be wanting the exact opposite. 

Then why did Obama get re-elected if "the country seemed to be wanting the exact opposite" by the results of 2010 mid terms?  Why was 2010 not a direct referendum on Obama?

 

[The Observer 641]

Just now, TimmySmith said:

 

Republicans picked up 63 House seats in 2010.   Dems picked up 41 seats in 2018.  Find someone who can do the math for you. 

 

Dude, perhaps you should follow the chain of discussion before making an ass of yourself.  Telling me Republican numbers from 2010 has absolutely NOTHING to do with my discussion with TBayXXX.  You're running your mouth and it's totally irrelevant to the discussion. 

[12th Man 884]

Another day, another Newbie beatdown. Newbs must have the head of a retard the way he absorbs blows.  

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,339]

3 minutes ago, 12th Man said:

Another day, another Newbie beatdown. Newbs must have the head of a retard the way he absorbs blows.  

He must look like the elephant man.

[12th Man 884]

2 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

He must look like the elephant man.

If you look at that ridiculous pic  he posted his fingers look very deformed.  

[The Observer 641]

Oh goodie. The mental midgets are here. After 15 consecutive posts discussion elections we will now be treated to a bunch of third graders seeing whose insults are best.

[TBayXXXVII 2,669]

26 minutes ago, TimmySmith said:

History has shown that more money in the hands of citizens drives the National Debt up.  Recession is the only thing that reverses it.  For a different thread.

That's because people want to live outside of their means.  It's also because there are Democrats who create victims, spend money to fix it, when it doesn't work, they claim it's because they didn't spend enough money and that Republican's caused it.