Jump to content
Alias Detective

Official President Trump Impeachment Inquiry Thread

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Evidence smedivence....they dont like him, and that alone is enough......an unlikable president?? The horror, who cares if he is helping this country get stronger, he does not say the words that liberals want him to.....so, must be destroyed....

I don't think Underdog and Sweet Polly Purebread would even be on the left in this day and age.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

“Lawful subpoenas”, literally require an enforcement mechanism; that’s the “poena” part of the word.  The enforcement mechanism is a judicial penalty, and that penalty can only be created if the House votes to authorize an impeachment inquiry.

Absent a vote to authorize, the Legislative Branch has not established compulsion authority (aka judicial enforcement authority), as they attempt to work through their quasi-constitutional “impeachment inquiry” process.

Instead of subpoenas, Adam Schiff (House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence); and Chairman Eliot L. Engel (House Committee on Foreign Affairs) can only send out request letters. The compliance is discretionary based on the outlook of the recipient.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, iam90sbaby said:

Hawkeye went completely MIA after I called him out for being Sho, just wanted to point that out 

He's gone back to verify us as crazy Nazis and try to get more status at the loser's club.  Didn't add anything of note here and doubt he does there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/17/2019 at 2:34 PM, IGotWorms said:

It’s been admitted. All of it. How can you still question this? :wacko:

Hey retard.  When's the vote?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, iam90sbaby said:

Hawkeye went completely MIA after I called him out for being Sho, just wanted to point that out 

I'm still here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TimmySmith said:

He's gone back to verify us as crazy Nazis and try to get more status at the loser's club.  Didn't add anything of note here and doubt he does there.

I didn't.  Sorry I don't live up to the quality of posts on here. 😂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hawkeye isn't Sho. The guy's been somewhat reasonable and NFW given all that's been revealed about what actually went on in 2016 would Sho still be reasonable.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Filthy Fernadez said:

Hawkeye isn't Sho. The guy's been somewhat reasonable and NFW given all that's been revealed about what actually went on in 2016 would Sho still be reasonable.

Agreed.  Sho has a distinct "tard" quality that Hawkey lacks in his posts.  Sho posts are distinct and unique - they're impossible to duplicate and I would have known right away.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

I guarantee you it's not. Hawkeye also uses the same name over at FBGheys.

That means nothing. Sho is exactly the kind of guy that would have multiple accounts on multiple boards. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, iam90sbaby said:

That means nothing. Sho is exactly the kind of guy that would have multiple accounts on multiple boards. 

Why would Sho use an alias?  He wasn't banned.  He just left because he kept looking like a fool, much like Worms now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, iam90sbaby said:

That means nothing. Sho is exactly the kind of guy that would have multiple accounts on multiple boards. 

Sho doesn't use aliases.  His posting style is so distinctive that Hawkeye doesn't even come close.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Sho doesn't use aliases.  His posting style is so distinctive that Hawkeye doesn't even come close.

To me Hawkeye seems like Sho trying not to seem like Sho. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Strike said:

Why would Sho use an alias?  He wasn't banned.  He just left because he kept looking like a fool, much like Worms now.

This.  He couldn't back his posts up with facts, only emotion and feelings so he left.  At FBGheys, the forums are filled with "feelings are facts" guys so he fits right in and won't get resistance like he does here.  Plus, the mods will ban people he reports since they are all on the same side.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Strike said:

Why would Sho use an alias?  He wasn't banned.  He just left because he kept looking like a fool, much like Worms now.

I don’t know some people take the username thing pretty serious. He got embarrassed but wanted to come back but not as Sho. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, iam90sbaby said:

To me Hawkeye seems like Sho trying not to seem like Sho. 

You seriously have issues if you’re still thinking about this. Sho and I both post on FBG. Go look for yourself and you’ll see we’re not the same person. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

This.  He couldn't back his posts up with facts, only emotion and feelings so he left.  At FBGheys, the forums are filled with "feelings are facts" guys so he fits right in and won't get resistance like he does here.  Plus, the mods will ban people he reports since they are all on the same side.

Sho not only thinks he is always right but feels the need to try and correct others with different opinions.  It is quite alarming how stupid he is.  I seriously think he is on the spectrum or retarded and feel bad for him sometimes.  Hawkeye's posts are reasonable and quite different.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Strike said:

Why would Sho use an alias?  He wasn't banned.  He just left because he kept looking like a fool, much like Worms now.

That never make me leave. :bandana: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, MDC said:

That never made me leave. :bandana: 

Someone has to make the coffee around here. :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Beaker15 said:

Sho not only thinks he is always right but feels the need to try and correct others with different opinions.  It is quite alarming how stupid he is.  I seriously think he is on the spectrum or retarded and feel bad for him sometimes.  Hawkeye's posts are reasonable and quite different.

He has no grasp of reality. He posts all the time that he doesn’t instigate anything. The guy thrives on it. He thinks he is always right. Such a pathetic existence.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, titans&bucs&bearsohmy! said:

Hawker isn't sho. Hawker comes off far too reasonable and polite to be sho. Sho isn't capable of that. 

Hawker isn't reasonable nor polite with his back door talk. He throws just enough out to try and make himself "seem" credible. He's just as insufferable as the rest of the bored libs. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, shorepatrol said:

Hawker isn't reasonable nor polite with his back door talk. He throws just enough out to try and make himself "seem" credible. He's just as insufferable as the rest of the bored libs. 

Nailed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't kept up lately, how's this whole unwarranted Impeachment charade coming along? :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Big Guy said:

I haven't kept up lately, how's this whole unwarranted Impeachment charade coming along? :dunno:

I don't keep up either. It was still just a big box full of nothing but bubblewrap when I last checked in. When Joe Biden was vice-president, he successfully pressured Ukraine to fire the prosecutor investigating the oil and gas company that for some reason hired his son for $50K/month by threatening to withhold aid money. Apparently, that was perfectly acceptable behavior, not corruption. Anyway, when Trump asked them to reopen the investigation, that is unacceptable. They may also dig up a 3 1/2 minute parking meter violation from 1987, and a negative Yelp review of one of his hotel restaurants. 

Anyway, the MSM, in their cognitive dissonance bubble,  thinks impeachment is a fabulous idea. Here's are a couple of samples of their righteous outrage:

Charles Blowhard of the NYTimes. https://archive.is/C6bCZ

A gay guy that Michigan exported to LA and hopefully cancelled his MI voter registration on the way out: https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2019/10/21/trump-impeachment-dam-breaks-sondland-hill-taylor-yovanovitch-column/4036697002/

 

 

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seriously, how do the liberals keep it up? They have some kind of superpower Energizer Bunny motivation to focus with laser beam intensity in spewing hatred in every format known to man. They are the real life embodiment of the dark side in Star Wars. Even Hitler grew tired in the end.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, sderk said:

Seriously, how do the liberals keep it up? They have some kind of superpower Energizer Bunny motivation to focus with laser beam intensity in spewing hatred in every format known to man. They are the real life embodiment of the dark side in Star Wars. Even Hitler grew tired in the end.   

Beats working. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Big Guy said:

I haven't kept up lately, how's this whole unwarranted Impeachment charade coming along? :dunno:

Apparently some are more worried about me being an alias of Sho. So... must not be much else going on. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, shorepatrol said:

Hawker isn't reasonable nor polite with his back door talk. He throws just enough out to try and make himself "seem" credible. He's just as insufferable as the rest of the bored libs. 

How am I not reasonable nor polite?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, KSB2424 said:

Update?

These things take time I guess. Years in fact. Especially when they got nothing to go off of. Maybe in 2025 they will reach a verdict. :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The top diplomat in Ukraine gave “incredibly damning” testimony Tuesday morning, according to a Democrat in the room.

William B. Taylor Jr., the top diplomat in Ukraine, gave “damning” testimony Tuesday about President Trump and the effort to pressure Ukraine’s government for political gain, according to a Democratic lawmaker and another person familiar with the opening statement Mr. Taylor delivered behind closed doors in the ongoing impeachment inquiry.

“What he said was incredibly damning to the president of the United States,” Representative Ted Lieu, Democrat of California, said after emerging after hours of questioning Tuesday morning. He declined to elaborate further, citing House rules against releasing such testimony.

Mr. Taylor became one of star witnesses in the Democratic impeachment probe after a colleague, Kurt D. Volker, the special envoy to Ukraine, revealed a series of text messages from September in which Mr. Taylor wrote that he thought it was “crazy to withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

The top diplomat in Ukraine gave “incredibly damning” testimony Tuesday morning, according to a Democrat in the room.

Like there was any other people in the room. 

Also, link to the transcript? Oh..........there isn't one. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Filthy Fernadez said:

Like there was any other people in the room. 

Also, link to the transcript? Oh..........there isn't one. 

I don’t think you get how this works. There probably is a transcript since it’s basically a deposition. No it has not been publicly released. This Taylor fella will most likely be testifying publicly in front of the senate, though, if there is an impeachment trial. If you say his testimony is “damning” and then he gets in front of the senate and it actually isn’t, well you’ve just lost your trial.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×