Jump to content
Alias Detective

*Official 2020 Election Thread*

Recommended Posts

Just saw that in Stacy Abrams lawsuit over her election that she claimed the same exact things that Trump is claiming now. Nobody on the left was calling her a crack pot. They cheered her on. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Y’all would destroy democracy over this. 

Thats what good Americans are trying to prevent.  

There's 74 million Americans who know they're being focked over,  like factually being rip off by 3rd world mentality scumbag losers (who got caught) are trying to do it,, yet not a single riot, burnt building, busines looted, police officer or civilian injured (a witness is hospitalized though)or any other form of animalistic violence.  

You really need to shove your dangerous nonsense up your disgusting rotten ass. 

 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, iam90sbaby said:

What happens if Trump just says "nah I'm not leaving" and there's a million America First patriots outside protecting him? 

He should, he won't need the million Americans.  The military has his ass. If the constitution is on his side, that's who they'll protect. 

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Just saw that in Stacy Abrams lawsuit over her election that she claimed the same exact things that Trump is claiming now. Nobody on the left was calling her a crack pot. They cheered her on. 

Fat POS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Just saw that in Stacy Abrams lawsuit over her election that she claimed the same exact things that Trump is claiming now. Nobody on the left was calling her a crack pot. They cheered her on. 

Does she have video non evidence though ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, tanatastic said:

If there’s an army of clowns protecting him outside the White House it ends the same way, him not being president just with more domestic terrorism to account for after. It doesn’t end with him being anointed president because people are scared of the terrorists outside protecting him with guns lol.

Yeah, you people care about political violence now. I remember back in 2017 when some animals in Chicago tortured a mentally handicapped kid because Trump won. And that was only the beginning of what you saw the next four years. You and Worms on your high horse is comical.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, drobeski said:

He should, he won't need the million Americans.  The military has his ass. If the constitution is on his side, that's who they'll protect. 

The military would have nothing to do with him and your delusional fantasy would never happen. Oh and no courts have ruled in favor of this fraud still, sorry it’s fantasy until the gavel falls in their favor.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, drobeski said:

Won't do it.. old hag disappeared too. Its how they roll. 

Because I don’t stick my d!ck in crazy. :wave:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, tanatastic said:

The military would have nothing to do with him and your delusional fantasy would never happen. Oh and no courts have ruled in favor of this fraud still, sorry it’s fantasy until the gavel falls in their favor.

Hey cashier, stick with action figures. You're out of your league. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, drobeski said:

You got nothing. 

Not a bit. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, tanatastic said:

Win 1 state reversal then talk. Til then I am your daddy and am owning you as such.

The drunk lady that was with Giuliani was pretty convincing though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Hawkeye21 said:

The drunk lady that was with Giuliani was pretty convincing though.

How about the black one in the video above ? Another child chimes in. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, tanatastic said:

Win 1 state reversal then talk. Til then I am your daddy and am owning you as such.

See, "owned". You're a child, go play with your toys.  

1 state ? Cases for Trump victory, by state
Pennsylvania: Clearest case for Trump, with several paths to victory.
1. PA is violating Bush v. Gore, quite strictly, via its mail-in ballot administration scheme.
2. PA is violating the Rehnquist concurrence to Bush v. Gore, by means of violating its own state law. Trump can appeal to SCOTUS regarding this special Constitutional violation.
3. The national route: If SCOTUS mandates fixes related to the Smartmatic/Dominion scandal nationwide, this would also flip PA.
4. Clear violations of Bush v. Gore regarding in-person voting.
5. Clear violations of an enormous amount of laws throughout the state, many fraudsters have come out and bragged.

Michigan and Wisconsin:
1. Clear violations of Bush v. Gore, but not as many as PA.
2. Dominion/Smartmatic again
3. Deliveries of votes in violation of US law.

Georgia:
1. Deliveries of votes in violation of US law
2. Violations of the Rehnquist concurrence.
3. Violations of the Bush v. Gore decision, when mail-ins and other fraud-vulnerable means of voting are considered. Furthermore, Raffensperger admitted to violations of Bush v. Gore on voting machines in court against Powell.

AZ+NV: Myriad issues, including Bush v. Gore violations.

Furthermore, the Rehnquist concurrence necessitates an addendum, that the Constitution may be violated by means of inequality among votes; in other words, the use of the Rehnquist concurrence also affects downballot races, and would mean the victory of Sean Parnell & others. We could flip the House as a consequence, and gain many seats in the Senate.

Now GFY kid. 

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, drobeski said:

How about the black one in the video above ? Another child chimes in. 

She was great. Guess that’s a wrap, state should be reversing it’s certification any day now eh? When it does, you win, til then, you lose and lose bigly. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, tanatastic said:

She was great. Guess that’s a wrap, state should be reversing it’s certification any day now eh? When it does, you win, til then, you lose and lose bigly. 

Obama phone on the  fritz? Joe gonna get you a new one? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, drobeski said:

How about the black one in the video above ? Another child chimes in. 

Debunked

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

how so? cause the NYT opinion piece disagrees?

 

Because I said it's debunked.  I'm taking the drobeski approach to this one.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, tanatastic said:

Win 1 state reversal then talk. Til then I am your daddy and am owning you as such.

So weve gone from no shred of evidencen to no widespread evidence, to overturn a state, then talk.  I thought only Newbie was strong enough to move goal posts that much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If we're being objective, there's a lot of smoke here.

I'm not saying it was a coordinated effort, but with all of the numbers and testimony and discrepancy, shouldn't there be an investigation to make sure?

 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, drobeski said:

Too bad Trump didn't have his kids get billions in foreign (China, Ukraine others)  cash back to the family. That would have been the honorable, decent thing to do. 

Hack city!

You might want to look at the 666 building in New York.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, BLS said:

If we're being objective, there's a lot of smoke here.

I'm not saying it was a coordinated effort, but with all of the numbers and testimony and discrepancy, shouldn't there be an investigation to make sure?

 

You understand that judges actually go through all the evidence is presented right? The problem is, and Rudy's even admitted to it in court, they don't have evidence.

 

Waaah, its not fair!! Is really hard to investigate.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

So weve gone from no shred of evidencen to no widespread evidence, to overturn a state, then talk.  I thought only Newbie was strong enough to move goal posts that much.

How about the attorney general? How about every judge has ruled against it these clowns? Including the ones that were appointed by Trump? Which includes the Attorney General by the way.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, drobeski said:

See, "owned". You're a child, go play with your toys.  

1 state ? Cases for Trump victory, by state
Pennsylvania: Clearest case for Trump, with several paths to victory.
1. PA is violating Bush v. Gore, quite strictly, via its mail-in ballot administration scheme.
2. PA is violating the Rehnquist concurrence to Bush v. Gore, by means of violating its own state law. Trump can appeal to SCOTUS regarding this special Constitutional violation.
3. The national route: If SCOTUS mandates fixes related to the Smartmatic/Dominion scandal nationwide, this would also flip PA.
4. Clear violations of Bush v. Gore regarding in-person voting.
5. Clear violations of an enormous amount of laws throughout the state, many fraudsters have come out and bragged.

Michigan and Wisconsin:
1. Clear violations of Bush v. Gore, but not as many as PA.
2. Dominion/Smartmatic again
3. Deliveries of votes in violation of US law.

Georgia:
1. Deliveries of votes in violation of US law
2. Violations of the Rehnquist concurrence.
3. Violations of the Bush v. Gore decision, when mail-ins and other fraud-vulnerable means of voting are considered. Furthermore, Raffensperger admitted to violations of Bush v. Gore on voting machines in court against Powell.

AZ+NV: Myriad issues, including Bush v. Gore violations.

Furthermore, the Rehnquist concurrence necessitates an addendum, that the Constitution may be violated by means of inequality among votes; in other words, the use of the Rehnquist concurrence also affects downballot races, and would mean the victory of Sean Parnell & others. We could flip the House as a consequence, and gain many seats in the Senate.

Now GFY kid. 

You understand cutting and pasting claims that have been smacked down in every court so far doesn't count as evidence right?

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, drobeski said:

Thats what good Americans are trying to prevent.  

There's 74 million Americans who know they're being focked over,  like factually being rip off by 3rd world mentality scumbag losers (who got caught) are trying to do it,, yet not a single riot, burnt building, busines looted, police officer or civilian injured (a witness is hospitalized though)or any other form of animalistic violence.  

You really need to shove your dangerous nonsense up your disgusting rotten ass. 

 

So you mean these law-abiding citizens agree with the attorney general and everybody in the justice system who has reviewed these frivolous claims?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, drobeski said:

He should, he won't need the million Americans.  The military has his ass. If the constitution is on his side, that's who they'll protect. 

Is this the same military who came out today and said Trump's legal team that claimed that some special ops unit winter to Germany to seize ballot boxes and took casualties as a result said that the entire claim was utter bucking bullshit? Google the Kraken unit.

 

You know what it takes for a standing General 2 countermand the presidents claims? 

 

Yeah, they got his back all right. With a sniper rifle.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now they’re claiming Lin Wood and Sydney Powell might be democratic plants. ☹️
 

I think this is where someone is supposed to say clown show!

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They cheated. Everybody knows they cheated. They're corrupt AF but they aren't stupid. They wouldn't have attempted it if they weren't 100% confident the fix was in. 

It's a shame they're going to be rewarded for wiping their asses with the constitution but it looks like that's what's gonna happen. 

On the positive side, they'll never be able to say that anything anybody else does is unAmerican or runs counter to our values. They've lost any sliver of credibility they may have had. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

By the time this is all done, Trumpism will be a mental illness listed in the DSM. LOFL at the guys that don't trust the MSM but think OAN, Newsmax and Breitbart are telling them the truth.  This thread could be in someone's dissertation about gaslighting and mass delusion.

 

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Fnord said:

By the time this is all done, Trumpism will be a mental illness listed in the DSM. LOFL at the guys that don't trust the MSM but think OAN, Newsmax and Breitbart are telling them the truth.  This thread could be in someone's dissertation about gaslighting and mass delusion.

 

 

It will be interesting to see what the GOP does with this particularly cancerous segment of their party. If they don’t figure out how to effectively distance themselves, they may never hold the office of President again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, OldMaid said:

It will be interesting to see what the GOP does with this particularly cancerous segment of their party. If they don’t figure out how to effectively distance themselves, they may never hold the office of President again.

They did this to themselves. Fuk the GOP. It needs to be torn down and rebuilt by ACTUAL conservatives, not Trump groupies. Let the malignant Trumpers all sit in their homes in the middle of nowhere stroking their guns and fantasizing about the upcoming civil war. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Fnord said:

 This thread could be in someone's dissertation about gaslighting and mass delusion.

I doubt it will make anyone change to the 5th alias the the Russian collusion and Ukraine threads have done. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Fnord said:

They did this to themselves. Fuk the GOP. It needs to be torn down and rebuilt by ACTUAL conservatives, not Trump groupies. Let the malignant Trumpers all sit in their homes in the middle of nowhere stroking their guns and fantasizing about the upcoming civil war. 

Actually, I’ll say it again: I’d love to see the middle from both sides coalesce and form a whole new party. Let’s leave both fringe sides on an island without enough support to be a threat.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×