Jump to content
JustinCharge

nuclear war - doomsday⌛

Recommended Posts

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/russia-warns-again-that-risks-of-nuclear-confrontation-with-us-growing-tass/ar-AA1ai6Vg

 

Russia warns again that risks of nuclear confrontation with US growing - TASS

Story by Reuters • 2h ago

(Reuters) - Risks of a direct military confrontation between the two nuclear powers, Russia and the United States, are steadily growing, the TASS news agency quoted a senior Russian diplomat as saying on Tuesday.

Vladimir Yermakov, the foreign ministry's head of nuclear non-proliferation, told the Russian state news agency that Washington is escalating the risks through its conduct with Moscow.

Since the start of its invasion on Ukraine 14 months ago, Moscow has issued regular charges against the U.S. and what it calls "the collective West" for raising the risks of a nuclear war, rhetoric intended to deter Kyiv's allies.

"If the United States continues to follow its current course of confrontation with Russia, with the stakes constantly escalating on the verge of sliding into direct armed conflict, then the fate of START (nuclear arms treaty) may be a foregone conclusion," Yermakov said.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, JustinCharge said:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/russia-warns-again-that-risks-of-nuclear-confrontation-with-us-growing-tass/ar-AA1ai6Vg

 

Russia warns again that risks of nuclear confrontation with US growing - TASS

Story by Reuters • 2h ago

(Reuters) - Risks of a direct military confrontation between the two nuclear powers, Russia and the United States, are steadily growing, the TASS news agency quoted a senior Russian diplomat as saying on Tuesday.

Vladimir Yermakov, the foreign ministry's head of nuclear non-proliferation, told the Russian state news agency that Washington is escalating the risks through its conduct with Moscow.

Since the start of its invasion on Ukraine 14 months ago, Moscow has issued regular charges against the U.S. and what it calls "the collective West" for raising the risks of a nuclear war, rhetoric intended to deter Kyiv's allies.

"If the United States continues to follow its current course of confrontation with Russia, with the stakes constantly escalating on the verge of sliding into direct armed conflict, then the fate of START (nuclear arms treaty) may be a foregone conclusion," Yermakov said.

I'll bet you $10,000 that nuclear war with the United States doesn't occur before year's end. Take my bet or shut the fock up.

Put your money where your mouth is, beeyatch!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, OldMaid said:

So you’re saying even the Jersey mafia can’t get a win? :lol:

He didn't see nuh'in', capisce? :ninja:

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, JustinCharge said:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/russia-warns-again-that-risks-of-nuclear-confrontation-with-us-growing-tass/ar-AA1ai6Vg

 

Russia warns again that risks of nuclear confrontation with US growing - TASS

Story by Reuters • 2h ago

(Reuters) - Risks of a direct military confrontation between the two nuclear powers, Russia and the United States, are steadily growing, the TASS news agency quoted a senior Russian diplomat as saying on Tuesday.

Vladimir Yermakov, the foreign ministry's head of nuclear non-proliferation, told the Russian state news agency that Washington is escalating the risks through its conduct with Moscow.

Since the start of its invasion on Ukraine 14 months ago, Moscow has issued regular charges against the U.S. and what it calls "the collective West" for raising the risks of a nuclear war, rhetoric intended to deter Kyiv's allies.

"If the United States continues to follow its current course of confrontation with Russia, with the stakes constantly escalating on the verge of sliding into direct armed conflict, then the fate of START (nuclear arms treaty) may be a foregone conclusion," Yermakov said.

Is it because we won’t denounce homosexuality?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Pimpadeaux said:

I'll bet you $10,000 that nuclear war with the United States doesn't occur before year's end. Take my bet or shut the fock up.

Put your money where your mouth is, beeyatch!

 

When the nukes fly, you'll be too dead to pay up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

Is it because we won’t denounce homosexuality?

At least we'd be getting nuked for a good reason.

I'll as Vladdie to stop at San Francisco, New York, Los Angeles, Austin,  Montreal, and Berlin next time I see him. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ive noticed we are getting more and more frequent tests of the emergency bradcast system / emergency alert system on internet radio on phones in the last month.  im not sure how that is helpful because all your phones will be bricks.  the UK just staged its first test of such as system (which obviously is prep for nuclear war), and it was hit and miss. 

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-65177316

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UK_Emergency_Alert_System

 

UK Emergency Alert System

The United Kingdom's mobile phone alert system is an emergency population warning system that uses cell broadcast.[1] Early testing began in 2014, with the first test alert sent in March 2020.[2] The warning system is intended for use in major incidents such as flooding or terror attacks.[3] The Emergency Alert System was launched on 19 March 2023, and tested on a nationwide basis for the first time on 23 April 2023.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/apr/23/uk-emergency-alert-test-three-looking-into-why-users-failed-to-get-text

 

UK emergency alert test: Three looking into why users failed to get text

Network’s users report en masse that SMS, accompanied by piercing 10-second tone, never arrived

The mobile network Three said it was investigating why many of its users failed to receive an emergency alert from the government, the first nationwide test for the UK’s new national warning system.

The alarm was scheduled to sound at 3pm on all mobile devices connected to the UK’s 4G and 5G networks, but while the piercing, 10-second tone did arrive for millions of people, and up to a minute early for some, Three users reported en masse that they did not receive it.

“We are aware that a number of customers have not received the test alert,” a Three spokesperson said. “We are working closely with the government to understand why and ensure it doesn’t happen when the system is in use.”

A government spokesperson said: “We have effectively completed the test of the UK-wide emergency alerts system, the biggest public communications exercise of its kind ever done. We are working with mobile network operators to review the outcome and any lessons learned.”

A very small proportion of users on some mobile networks had not received the message, a government source said, and that failure will form part of the review.

The overwhelming majority of users who failed to receive the alert appeared to be with the Three network, but some on the O2 and Vodafone networks also reported difficulty. Users whose phones have not received a software update in more than two years, and those who were not within reach of a 4G or 5G network were not expected to successfully receive it.

Some users chose to opt out of the alert in advance. All phones allow users to opt out of the second and third highest tier of the alerts, called “extreme” and “severe” alerts, but few provide the option to opt out of the highest tier, officially called “presidential” but renamed “government” in the UK. The test was sent as a “severe” warning.

Emma, 30, a teaching assistant, was aware and ready for the alert, which never came. “My phone was ready but it didn’t come through but other people’s went off,” she said, while shopping in the Westfield Stratford City mall in east London.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, JustinCharge said:

it happens all the time.  ive seen it.  whoever wrote that doesnt know what they are talking about.

Did you see it at the McDonald's you claimed said patrons needed to show proof of vaccination to receive service?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, nobody said:

Did you see it at the McDonald's you claimed said patrons needed to show proof of vaccination to receive service?

Paranoid schizophrenics see lots of things. Problem is, they’re the only one who sees them. 🙁

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, OldMaid said:

Paranoid schizophrenics see lots of things. Problem is, they’re the only one who sees them. 🙁

Not true. They do see lots of things, but so do they.

 

:shocking:

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, JustinCharge said:

ive noticed we are getting more and more frequent tests of the emergency bradcast system / emergency alert system on internet radio on phones in the last month.  im not sure how that is helpful because all your phones will be bricks.  the UK just staged its first test of such as system (which obviously is prep for nuclear war), and it was hit and miss. 

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-65177316

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UK_Emergency_Alert_System

 

UK Emergency Alert System

The United Kingdom's mobile phone alert system is an emergency population warning system that uses cell broadcast.[1] Early testing began in 2014, with the first test alert sent in March 2020.[2] The warning system is intended for use in major incidents such as flooding or terror attacks.[3] The Emergency Alert System was launched on 19 March 2023, and tested on a nationwide basis for the first time on 23 April 2023.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/apr/23/uk-emergency-alert-test-three-looking-into-why-users-failed-to-get-text

 

UK emergency alert test: Three looking into why users failed to get text

Network’s users report en masse that SMS, accompanied by piercing 10-second tone, never arrived

The mobile network Three said it was investigating why many of its users failed to receive an emergency alert from the government, the first nationwide test for the UK’s new national warning system.

The alarm was scheduled to sound at 3pm on all mobile devices connected to the UK’s 4G and 5G networks, but while the piercing, 10-second tone did arrive for millions of people, and up to a minute early for some, Three users reported en masse that they did not receive it.

“We are aware that a number of customers have not received the test alert,” a Three spokesperson said. “We are working closely with the government to understand why and ensure it doesn’t happen when the system is in use.”

A government spokesperson said: “We have effectively completed the test of the UK-wide emergency alerts system, the biggest public communications exercise of its kind ever done. We are working with mobile network operators to review the outcome and any lessons learned.”

A very small proportion of users on some mobile networks had not received the message, a government source said, and that failure will form part of the review.

The overwhelming majority of users who failed to receive the alert appeared to be with the Three network, but some on the O2 and Vodafone networks also reported difficulty. Users whose phones have not received a software update in more than two years, and those who were not within reach of a 4G or 5G network were not expected to successfully receive it.

Some users chose to opt out of the alert in advance. All phones allow users to opt out of the second and third highest tier of the alerts, called “extreme” and “severe” alerts, but few provide the option to opt out of the highest tier, officially called “presidential” but renamed “government” in the UK. The test was sent as a “severe” warning.

Emma, 30, a teaching assistant, was aware and ready for the alert, which never came. “My phone was ready but it didn’t come through but other people’s went off,” she said, while shopping in the Westfield Stratford City mall in east London.

Nuclear war will break out any second!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

Go war!!! Keep spending on wars liberals!!!

🤸‍♀️🤸‍♀️🤸‍♀️🤸‍♀️🤸‍♀️

seachoad MAGAturd. seachoad MAGAturd. hominahominahominahomina

What a dumbass man-child you are.

🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

seachoad MAGAturd. seachoad MAGAturd. hominahominahominahomina

What a dumbass man-child you are.

🤣

generalpimpledoosh tries so hard.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Great news

If this is true…it’s over. Russia you lost time to take the best deal you get.

I don't what there is to negotiate from Ukraine's standpoint. Get the fock off the land we agreed to be ours in 1991.

I don't see what Ukraine would give up here other than a NATO membership.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/25/2023 at 10:37 PM, Pimpadeaux said:

Nuclear war will break out any second!

Don't worry, you're safe. They try to keep the queers and Trannys away from combat. You'll probably be Stateside peeling potatoes. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Pimpadeaux said:

I don't what there is to negotiate from Ukraine's standpoint. Get the fock off the land we agreed to be ours in 1991.

I don't see what Ukraine would give up here other than a NATO membership.

Not sure. But if China becomes involved in pushing for peace it’s over for Russia.

Zelensky at some point also needs to realize this cannot go on forever. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, thegeneral said:

Not sure. But if China becomes involved in pushing for peace it’s over for Russia.

Zelensky at some point also needs to realize this cannot go on forever. 

I just don't see a scenario that makes Ukraine happy other than Russia giving back what it has taken.

But you're right, Russia ultimately could win the war of attrition as long as civil unrest in Putin's own country becomes his undoing. 

Maybe let Russia have the hardcore pro-Russian areas of Ukraine that it seized. In exchange, Russia helps Ukraine rebuild and accepts Ukraine joining NATO.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Pimpadeaux said:

I just don't see a scenario that makes Ukraine happy other than Russia giving back what it has taken.

But you're right, Russia ultimately could win the war of attrition as long as civil unrest in Putin's own country becomes his undoing. 

Maybe let Russia have the hardcore pro-Russian areas of Ukraine that it seized. In exchange, Russia helps Ukraine rebuild and accepts Ukraine joining NATO.

 

Ending a war where one country invaded another is tricky. If China is going to begin putting heat on Russia to end it however, that would be a good thing. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Pimpadeaux said:

I just don't see a scenario that makes Ukraine happy other than Russia giving back what it has taken.

But you're right, Russia ultimately could win the war of attrition as long as civil unrest in Putin's own country becomes his undoing. 

Maybe let Russia have the hardcore pro-Russian areas of Ukraine that it seized. In exchange, Russia helps Ukraine rebuild and accepts Ukraine joining NATO.

 

Why does Ukraine need to deal? I thought they were "kicking Russian ass".

😆 Go war!!  🤸‍♀️🤸‍♀️🤸‍♀️

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Ending a war where one country invaded another is tricky. If China is going to begin putting heat on Russia to end it however, that would be a good thing. 

No one else will talk to you outside of yourself? 😆 🤸‍♀️

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

No one else will talk to you outside of yourself? 😆 🤸‍♀️

Hey lunatic! Busy morning of stamp collecting for you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

wow, now libs are supporting China getting involved....

China getting involved in peace talks is probably a good thing. This was their first call with Zelensky since this started. Before they had just been buddying up with Vlad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

wow, now libs are supporting China getting involved....

Yep. They can't wait for the US to play pansy to China. Liberals are already buying their knee pads for when China comes to take over the US. 

Of course, most male liberals already own knee pads to pleasure their boyfriends. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

China getting involved in peace talks is probably a good thing. This was their first call with Zelensky since this started. Before they had just been buddying up with Vlad.

sure it is, I am sure its just cause they want peace, nothing else behind it

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

sure it is, I am sure its just cause they want peace, nothing else behind it

 

They weren’t saying boo before so I’ll take it. I mean we can keep blowing up all Vlad’s shet but that’s not good for anyone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ukraine attacked an oil depot in Crimea.  If Ukraine actually invades Crimea, I really don't see how Russia doesn't use nukes in response.  Russia cannot win a conventional war and it won't top the Crimea but it will enter what everyone considers Russia as well. 

 

https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-war-crimea-drone-29218ed006a79c4b0629688ce4820cc8

 

KYIV, Ukraine (AP) — A massive fire erupted at an oil depot in Crimea after it was hit by two of Ukraine’s drones, a Russia-appointed official there reported Saturday, the latest in a series of attacks on the annexed peninsula as Russia braces for an expected Ukrainian counteroffensive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No one considers Crimea part of Russia.  Russia knows it's not really theirs.  They won't use nuclear weapons if Ukraine attacks on Crimean soil.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what the 20th thing in this thread that this dude thinks will make Russia nuke the US?

Hopefully he gets those prepper supplies sold.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/26/2023 at 5:27 PM, Hardcore troubadour said:

Rusty, who didn’t make it out of the webolos, knows better than the us military on how to transport tanks. 

 

Hey look! It's a tank being unloaded from an AIRCRAFT.

🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Russia claims the Kremlin was hit by a Ukrainian drone strike in a Putin assassination attempt.  I mean that right there could justify a nuclear strike on Ukraine, the UK and the US, especially if it killed some top-level people in the Russian government.  That's how close we are to WW3.  it doesnt really matter if Ukraine denies or not, Russia as nukes and is judge, jury and executioner.

all of this shortly after Ukraine receives depleted uranium bombs, which further justifies a nuclear strike on NATO targets.

https://min.news/en/world/a7066d767be5007d6a2d7d76722a2104.html

On April 27, the British Ministry of Defense confirmed that the depleted uranium bombs provided by the UK to Ukraine had arrived in Ukraine, and they would not supervise how Ukraine used them. In other words, whether or not to use depleted uranium bombs and how to use them has nothing to do with the United Kingdom.

 

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, JustinCharge said:

Russia claims the Kremlin was hit by a Ukrainian drone strike in a Putin assassination attempt.  I mean that right there could justify a nuclear strike on Ukraine, the UK and the US, especially if it killed some top-level people in the Russian government.  That's how close we are to WW3.  it doesnt really matter if Ukraine denies or not, Russia as nukes and is judge, jury and executioner.

all of this shortly after Ukraine receives depleted uranium bombs, which further justifies a nuclear strike on NATO targets.

https://min.news/en/world/a7066d767be5007d6a2d7d76722a2104.html

On April 27, the British Ministry of Defense confirmed that the depleted uranium bombs provided by the UK to Ukraine had arrived in Ukraine, and they would not supervise how Ukraine used them. In other words, whether or not to use depleted uranium bombs and how to use them has nothing to do with the United Kingdom.

 

 

One of these days you're going to run out of "that right there could justify a nuclear strike." 

It was a focking drone.

🤣

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BUMP FOR TURDCORE TROUBADOOSH, BECAUSE HE CAN'T SCROLL DOWN.

🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×