Trump's residence raided by the FBI

[Masshole 642]

5 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

So tell us Internet detective- how deeply were you involved in the work surrounding the investigation of what Berger had? What makes you so privy to everything that no one else on the GC message board knows. The DOJ said they were copies. Prove otherwise.

Tell us also Internet sleuth why did the FBI choose not to press charges against Hillary? 

Why is Russia a part of this? Have nothing so you have to try to change topics or draw a false comparison?

The entire thought process of "If Biden didn't know, then Garland should be fired" is just stupid biased logic so of course you'd sit at your computer and nod away at the Twitter dopes posting that stuff. 

You know the first rule for when you are in a hole - stop digging?    Think about that.

Berger STUFFED CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS IN HIS FUKIN PANTS AND SMUGGLED THEM OUT OF THE WHITEHOUSE.   None of that is in dispute.   He definitely did that because he wanted to get some non-essential "Hillary's yoga schedule" stuff out of the whitehouse and the DOJ brooming the whole thing under the rug is definitely all above board.   You go ahead and keep telling yourself that.  

The FBI didn't pursue charges because they knew that would sink Hillary's campaign and they didn't want that.   As shown by their own internal communications they thought it was 100% certain she would win. 

The analogy presented with the "Trump had a server in Trump tower communicating with Russia" stuff is entirely justified and accurate to our present situation.   Either you know that and are trying to deflect or you are just a complete idiot. 

The FBI raiding the previous president's home is something that you should probably discuss with the top man in your operation - yah that's definitely just my "bias" speaking there.  

Man, you should really sit a few rounds out, champ. . . .

 

 

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

13 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

What does this have to do with Mar a Lago being raided?

It's the typical deflection to Hunter Biden, Hillary, BLM, Antifa, summer 2020 riots, etc.

It's like in "Top Gun" when the jet deploys decoys to divert the incoming anti-aircraft missile.

[Horseman 2,480]

6 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

So how does the process work in this instance?

Hey ShoNuff, take your I know you are but what am I line of questioning over to fbgs where it's appreciated.

4 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

See- this is where the thought process breaks down for them.  

The process breaks down for you when it turns out to be another nothingburger and you get slaughtered in November.  

[Djgb13 2,339]

I’m willing to bet NOTHING comes of this cause nothing actually happened. It’ll be even more of a bad look for the Dems 

[MDC 7,497]

Why didn’t Trump just return the boxes of classified documents he took?  

[listen2me 23 1,874]

It is all political.  Dems do this anytime there is an election on the horizon.  Like the Biden riots that magically settled down after the election.  How no one talks about BLM or black people anymore. Poof.  Gone.  

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

2 minutes ago, MDC said:

Why didn’t Trump just return the boxes of classified documents he took?  

Surprised it took nine pages to get to this question.

[Sean Mooney 1,984]

3 minutes ago, Masshole said:

You know the first rule for when you are in a hole - stop digging?    Think about that.

Berger STUFFED CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS IN HIS FUKIN PANTS AND SMUGGLED THEM OUT OF THE WHITEHOUSE.   None of that is in dispute.   He definitely did that because he wanted to get some non-essential "Hillary's yoga schedule" stuff out of the whitehouse and the DOJ brooming the whole thing under the rug is definitely all above board.   You go ahead and keep telling yourself that.  

The FBI didn't pursue charges because they knew that would sink Hillary's campaign and they didn't want that.   As shown by their own internal communications they thought it was 100% certain she would win. 

The analogy presented with the "Trump had a server in Trump tower communicating with Russia" stuff is entirely justified and accurate to our present situation.   Either you know that and are trying to deflect or you are just a complete idiot. 

The FBI raiding the previous president's home is something that you should probably discuss with the top man in your operation - yah that's definitely just my "bias" speaking there.  

Man, you should really sit a few rounds out, champ. . . .

 

 

On Berger from Reuters: 

Quote

 

Those accomplishments were overshadowed in July 2004, when the Justice Department revealed it was investigating whether Berger had removed classified documents and notes from the National Archives several months before his testimony to the commission investigating the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the United States.

At first, Berger at first said removing the documents in his attaché case and pants and jacket pockets was accidental, but later admitted he had done it deliberately. One Archives employee said Berger stuffed the papers down his pant legs.

Berger pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor, and was fined more than $50,000 and given 100 hours of community service and probation. He also lost his security clearance.

Republicans were outraged, saying Berger was trying to destroy incriminating evidence. But the Justice Department said he only took copies to cut up and no original material was lost.

 

Now you need to show evidence to support your side.

On Clinton:

Quote

 

The FBI "did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information," James Comey said. But "there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information."

Comey said they also found "no evidence that any of the additional work-related e-mails were intentionally deleted in an effort to conceal them."

"We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent," he said.

 

Again- you just decided to yell Russia even though I never said anything about Russia in this thread, or on this forum to my knowledge...maybe stay on task?

On the raid- Wray- a Trump appointee- and Garland have to okay it. I would guess not every raid action taken by the FBI and DOJ goes past the White House desk and I would guess that holds true for all Presidents and not just the ones I like or dislike. It's biased from you because we know nothing about this case yet other than the drips of information that have gotten out. If they find true evidence of a crime of some kind here should Garland still be fired? Do we not want Wray and Garland to do their job competently? Pretty sure people on the left were stupidly calling for Comey to be fired in 2015 and 2016 for similar reasons.

Man...you should really recalibrate your BS detector. Because it isn't working correctly anymore....champ.

 

[Reality 3,121]

This is fine, right?

 

[GutterBoy 2,899]

35 minutes ago, iam90sbaby said:

 We are now a banana republic.

These focking Trumpers are just a bunch of hysterical drama queen teenage girls.

[Sean Mooney 1,984]

10 minutes ago, Horseman said:

 

The process breaks down for you when it turns out to be another nothingburger and you get slaughtered in November.  

I'm running for office?

Well that is news to me..

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

1 minute ago, listen2me 23 said:

It is all political.  Dems do this anytime there is an election on the horizon.  Like the Biden riots that magically settled down after the election.  How no one talks about BLM or black people anymore. Poof.  Gone.  

So you think the summer 2020 riots were not driven by George Floyd and opportunists seizing the chance to get free stuff and burn things.

You think Biden somehow was behind those riots.

[Sean Mooney 1,984]

1 minute ago, Reality said:

This is fine, right?

 

Lawyers sometimes defend shitty people:

 

News at 11!

[Horseman 2,480]

2 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

I'm running for office?

Well that is news to me..

You're not too bright are you.

[MDC 7,497]

1 minute ago, Reality said:

This is fine, right?

 

The judge who signed the warrant was once a lawyer who defended unnamed “associates” in matters that almost certainly had nothing to do with the Epstein sex scandal?  

Clearly bias!  

[listen2me 23 1,874]

1 minute ago, Pimpadeaux said:

So you think the summer 2020 riots were not driven by George Floyd and opportunists seizing the chance to get free stuff and burn things.

You think Biden somehow was behind those riots.

They started with druggy george and were stirred by Dems when thry saw an opportunity.    Then remember when they got out of control nightly Lemon is on air questioning if it was now hurting the Dems.  

If you don't think Dem leaders weren't encouraging and or purposely looking the other way then you were not paying attention.   

[Sean Mooney 1,984]

1 minute ago, Horseman said:

You're not too bright are you.

Clearly you're not since you think I'm running in November.

Maybe you shouldn't be allowed to vote?

[MDC 7,497]

7 minutes ago, listen2me 23 said:

It is all political.  Dems do this anytime there is an election on the horizon.  Like the Biden riots that magically settled down after the election.  How no one talks about BLM or black people anymore. Poof.  Gone.  

I remember Don saying the riots were going to get worse if Biden won. 

Now not only didn’t they get worse, it’s actually Biden who turned off the riot machine.  

[Sean Mooney 1,984]

1 minute ago, MDC said:

The judge who signed the warrant was once a lawyer who defended unnamed “associates” in matters that almost certainly had nothing to do with the Epstein sex scandal?  

Clearly bias!  

It's clearly the smoking gun here.....

 

Imagine going on Twitter, seeing that link, reading it, and then nodding approvingly while you copy and past the link to share it here thinking "This is the evidence..."

1 minute ago, listen2me 23 said:

They started with druggy george and were stirred by Dems when thry saw an opportunity.    Then remember when they got out of control nightky Lemon is on air questioning if it was now hurting the Dems.  

If you don't think Dem leaders weren't encouraging and or purposely looking the other way then you were not paying attention.   

Or you guys are nuts?

[Horseman 2,480]

1 minute ago, Sean Mooney said:

Clearly you're not since you think I'm running in November.

Maybe you shouldn't be allowed to vote?

Continuing to play dumb isn't helping.  

[porkbutt 893]

 

[listen2me 23 1,874]

Just now, MDC said:

I remember Don saying the riots were going to get worse if Biden won. 

Now not only didn’t they get worse, it’s actually Biden who turned off the riot machine.  

Not sure why Don would say that.   But i think I remember him saying it.  

Yes the Dems are notorious for race baiting.  Yes they can stir the pot or leave it alone as they wish.  There have been other black people killed by police since Biden came in.  Why does no one care now? It gets some play thrn just fades away in a day or 2.  

Look Biden in now all race relations are solved and no one cares! Not blasted daily all over CNN.  

Magic.

[Sean Mooney 1,984]

3 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Continuing to play dumb isn't helping.  

Please tell me how it is going to crush me come November.

[Hawkeye21 2,400]

19 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Hey ShoNuff, take your I know you are but what am I line of questioning over to fbgs where it's appreciated.

The process breaks down for you when it turns out to be another nothingburger and you get slaughtered in November.  

I'm not ShoNuff, moron.

What was wrong with the question I asked.  Everyone makes me out to be dumb for not knowing it but when I ask the question all I get are crickets.  If it's so obvious then why can't anyone tell me off the top of their head?

[Sean Mooney 1,984]

1 minute ago, Hawkeye21 said:

I'm not ShoNuff, moron.

What was wrong with the question I asked.  Everyone makes me out to be dumb for not knowing it but when I ask the question all I get are crickets.  If it's so obvious then why can't anyone tell me off the top of their head?

They don't have an answer. Their MAGA bubble masters haven't provided them with one yet. 

It is where every conspiracy theory fails....

[listen2me 23 1,874]

1 minute ago, Sean Mooney said:

It's clearly the smoking gun here.....

 

Imagine going on Twitter, seeing that link, reading it, and then nodding approvingly while you copy and past the link to share it here thinking "This is the evidence..."

Or you guys are nuts?

Maybe I just pay attention and can see what is right in front of me. 

Election year: race baiting, race riots nightly, leagues canceling games and putting crap on their fields.

Now: none of that.  NFL may have some fluff "we are all in this together" slogan still in place I dont know.  

Again, magic.  

Biden is that good.  Tell a black guy he aint black if he doesn't bow and kiss thr ring.  Comes in office and POOF.  Fixed.  

[Horseman 2,480]

1 minute ago, Hawkeye21 said:

I'm not ShoNuff, moron.

What was wrong with the question I asked.  

It's the dumb I know you are what am I line of questioning that morons like ShoNuff employ.  You've been ShoNuff'ing for several days now. Maybe time for a break.

[Hawkeye21 2,400]

Just now, Sean Mooney said:

They don't have an answer. Their MAGA bubble masters haven't provided them with one yet. 

It is where every conspiracy theory fails....

I did a quick search but didn't really find much so I'm curious what it is they know.  I see that they report to the DOJ and Attorney General and they are overseen by the Director of National Intelligence.

[Hawkeye21 2,400]

2 minutes ago, Horseman said:

It's the dumb I know you are what am I line of questioning that morons like ShoNuff employ.  You've been ShoNuff'ing for several days now. Maybe time for a break.

It wasn't anything like that.  I said something and got blasted for it.  If I'm wrong then I will own it but I couldn't find anything that proves I was incorrect.  I asked those who blasted me why I was incorrect and no one seems to be able to answer it off the top of their head.  I'm assuming they are trying to look up the answer.

[GutterBoy 2,899]

16 minutes ago, Horseman said:

You're not too bright are you.

It's like raaaaaiiiinnn

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-broke-law-removal-records-122500277.html

Quote

Specifically, the law in question — Section 2071 of Title 18 of the U.S. Code — makes it a crime if someone who has custody of government documents or records “willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies or destroys” them.

Go Section 2071 of Title 18 of the U.S. Code!

[GutterBoy 2,899]

1 minute ago, Pimpadeaux said:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-broke-law-removal-records-122500277.html

Go Section 2071 of the Title 18 of the U.S. Code!

Did Rachel Madow tweet this out?

[jerryskids 6,838]

16 minutes ago, MDC said:

I remember Don saying the riots were going to get worse if Biden won. 

Now not only didn’t they get worse, it’s actually Biden who turned off the riot machine.  

Don't you find it a little odd that BLM just went poof after the election? It's al.ost like the MSM got the result it wanted and shifted to how awesome Biden was.

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

Just now, GutterBoy said:

Did Rachel Madow tweet this out?

It's from the New York Times.

And it's "Maddow."

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

4 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Don't you find it a little odd that BLM just went poof after the election? It's al.ost like the MSM got the result it wanted and shifted to how awesome Biden was.

The George Floyd protests ended in August, well ahead of the election.

BLM continues to remain active.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Lives_Matter#:~:text=The movement began in July,months earlier in February 2012.

[nobody 2,691]

1 hour ago, Sean Mooney said:

No- that's just stupid. Besides- if the White House knew it would look far more politically motivated. So Bob Weave is arguing that it should've been more political....to I guess discredit it more? 

I know you are a teacher so you may not understand how this stuff works, but when you work in a field with powerful people and you are taking an action that will piss off a bunch of powerful people, you usually make sure your boss knows about it.

We don't live in the ivory tower wonderland utopia where people just follow the letter of the law and that protects them.  The political blow back on this would need to be prepared for and understood.  Clearly the white house is lying or the FBI head is inept.

[listen2me 23 1,874]

2 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Don't you find it a little odd that BLM just went poof after the election? It's al.ost like the MSM got the result it wanted and shifted to how awesome Biden was.

Biden actually wants to fund the cops all of a sudden.  And not a peep from the black community or mayors/governors who were all for defunding them.  And if there have been peeps they do not get blasted on social or MSM.  When thats all we saw for a whole election year.  

Amazing isn't it.  

[jerryskids 6,838]

3 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

The George Floyd protests ended in August, well ahead of the election.

BLM continues to remain active.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Lives_Matter#:~:text=The movement began in July,months earlier in February 2012.

I'm talking about MSM coverage. HTH

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

1 minute ago, jerryskids said:

I'm talking about MSM coverage. HTH

What information sources are in this "MSM?"

And if the rioting had ended and BLM no longer was making much of a news splash, why would this MSM continue to generate stories about it?

[lickin_starfish 1,942]

17 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-broke-law-removal-records-122500277.html

Go Section 2071 of Title 18 of the U.S. Code!

Leave Hillary out of this.