If you are a male that dates a biological man, are you gay?

[iam90sbaby 2,503]

4 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

I could see never marrying/being serious, but never dating?  

In the divorce thread she laid the ground work for coming out.  She kept bringing up women having better sex lives with other women after they divorced their husbands. 

[IGotWorms 4,057]

6 minutes ago, iam90sbaby said:

Disgusting

You’re the one always taking Trump’s tiny little hog in your mouf

[TheNewGirl 1,375]

3 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

I could see never marrying/being serious, but never dating?  

I think I would be too picky. 

And I am also 47. Not many men my age, or slightly older are looking for a middle aged woman. I am not willing to be a nurse or a purse for someone either. So, I just have a feeling that the pickings would be pretty slim in terms of what men are looking for. And that's okay, I am not putting any blame on men for wanting what they want. 

I am sure I would have flings or friends with benefits, but I don't know. I know I don't think I'd live with someone again either. 

[TheNewGirl 1,375]

1 minute ago, iam90sbaby said:

In the divorce thread she laid the ground work for coming out.  She kept bringing up women having better sex lives with other women after they divorced their husbands. 

There are studies that have mentioned that. 

However, sex wouldn't be the primary driver for me to find someone new, so please don't try and look into my comments and find some kind of secret lesbian lifestyle I hope to one day have. 

[iam90sbaby 2,503]

Just now, TheNewGirl said:

There are studies that have mentioned that. 

However, sex wouldn't be the primary driver for me to find someone new, so please don't try and look into my comments and find some kind of secret lesbian lifestyle I hope to one day have. 

In 1-2 years you'll post a thread about it 

[TheNewGirl 1,375]

5 minutes ago, iam90sbaby said:

In 1-2 years you'll post a thread about it 

Ok. 

So, you're planning on my husband dying in like the next year or two? Since divorce isn't anywhere on our radars. 

That's positive and refreshing. 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,988]

8 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

You’re the one always taking Trump’s tiny little hog in your mouf

Wow. Your TDS is off the charts. Take a breather. 

[nobody 2,580]

3 hours ago, BeenHereBefore said:

He focked guys like you in prison.

I liked the one from Training Day.

Have you ever had your shìt pushed in, bro?

[MLCKAA 548]

1 hour ago, The Real timschochet said:

Oh don’t get me wrong. I will always defend your right to be a rude bastard. But I will defend my right to call you out for being one. 

You always present as a reasonable guy, props on that.

Consider the complaint of misgendering.  The modern construct of gender identity is conceptual at best.  Yet, gender fluid people insist that they choose their gender and accompanying pronouns and also insist that others conform to their choice of gender and pronouns, even in the face of contrary physical attributes.

Imagine anything else purely conceptual— I’ll use religion here just to stick with something that’s really in the popular domain.  Suppose that Christians collectively decided their pronoun would be The Saved.  Or all Muslims decided their pronoun would be The Preferred.  And they insisted that anytime not being called by proper first name, they were only to be called The Saved or The Preferred.

Non-Christians and Non-Muslims would be right in resisting that.  So it can also be regarding elective gender labels.  Both religion and gender fluidity are objectively conceptual.  It is not incumbent on the general public to oblige these whims or preferences.

[BeenHereBefore 1,472]

42 minutes ago, nobody said:

I liked the one from Training Day.

Have you ever had your shìt pushed in, bro?

Yea the Road House one and that both work.

[KSB2424 3,148]

That dude is ghey, he’s just ashamed about it so trying to “justify it” in his head. Kinda sad really.  

[nobody 2,580]

1 hour ago, IGotWorms said:

Well she is pretty hot for a dood 

I'd get with her.  

[edjr 6,578]

2 hours ago, IGotWorms said:

Well she is pretty hot for a dood 

She’s no Mulvaney

[Mike Hunt 264]

2 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

But there’s a big difference. All we are doing  is insisting that people be referred to by the labels that they choose THEMSELVES- whereas you are insisting on being free to label other people in ways they don’t necessarily want. 

 

What do you call a person attracted to both men and women, but has nobody attracted to them?   

Bi-Yourself

[weepaws 3,158]

31 minutes ago, nobody said:

I'd get with her.  

You mean Him, Ghey.  

[edjr 6,578]

27 minutes ago, Mike Hunt said:

 

What do you call a person attracted to both men and women, but has nobody attracted to them?   

Bi-Yourself

what do you call someone that will have sex with peefoam? 

tri-anything

[Hardcore troubadour 14,988]

He’s a centrist. 

[nobody 2,580]

1 hour ago, weepaws said:

You mean Him, Ghey.  

I don't care.  Dude looks just like a fine ass chick.

[Voltaire 5,207]

16 hours ago, jerryskids said:

I've heard this called the "face tattoo syndrome."  A person with a face tattoo walks up to you, and you stare at the tattoo.  The person says, "hey, why are you starting at my face?"  The answer is, because your face has a tattoo on it which draws attention, so don't get upset because it succeeded.

Similarly, this "alpha" dude put this on social media for everyone to comment on.  And when someone does, your response is to object to the reaction to the face tattoo, not the face tattoo itself.  

Your question should be:  why did this guy feel the need to post his face tattoo?

Look at me! I'm an Alpha Male!  Yeah Bro, yeah! Who's with me? WHO IS WITH ME?!?! 

[supermike80 1,822]

15 hours ago, TheNewGirl said:

I think I would be too picky. 

And I am also 47. Not many men my age, or slightly older are looking for a middle aged woman. I am not willing to be a nurse or a purse for someone either. So, I just have a feeling that the pickings would be pretty slim in terms of what men are looking for. And that's okay, I am not putting any blame on men for wanting what they want. 

I am sure I would have flings or friends with benefits, but I don't know. I know I don't think I'd live with someone again either. 

I've seen too many strories on how weird and difficult the dating scene is.  I'm with you TNG.  If I ever got divorced, I doubt I'd marry again.  I might try dating, but I imagine my right hand would be my regular partner.  

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,880]

53 minutes ago, supermike80 said:

I've seen too many strories on how weird and difficult the dating scene is.  I'm with you TNG.  If I ever got divorced, I doubt I'd marry again.  I might try dating, but I imagine my right hand would be my regular partner.  

As it is now.  I mean, after all, you're married.

My right bicep is about 2 inches bigger than my left.

[supermike80 1,822]

Just now, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

As it is now.  I mean, after all, you're married.

Solid point.

But I'm a geek club member.  I make 500K, have a 500 sq foot house, am in perfect health, and have to turn away hot blondes cause there are just too many of them that want me.

[Voltaire 5,207]

11 hours ago, supermike80 said:

 I have a 500 sq foot house, 

https://www.monsterhouseplans.com/house-plans/modern-style/576-sq-ft-home-1-story-2-bedroom-1-bath-house-plans-plan32-136/

This house is 76 square feet larger than your house.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,880]

1 hour ago, Voltaire said:

https://www.monsterhouseplans.com/house-plans/modern-style/576-sq-ft-home-1-story-2-bedroom-1-bath-house-plans-plan32-136/

This house is 76 square feet larger than your house.

That's not called a house.  They call that a "mansion" or an "estate". 

[Maximum Overkill 1,755]

 

[Engorgeous George 2,164]

On 1/8/2024 at 2:40 PM, The Real timschochet said:

But there’s a big difference. All we are doing  is insisting that people be referred to by the labels that they choose THEMSELVES- whereas you are insisting on being free to label other people in ways they don’t necessarily want. 

What gives you, or anyone, the right to insist how I behave?

[The Real timschochet 6,512]

9 minutes ago, Engorgeous George said:

What gives you, or anyone, the right to insist how I behave?

Fair question. 

Legally we don’t and should not have the right to insist that you be respectful of others in the way that we would like you to be. For example there should never, IMO, be a law that prohibits you from using the “n” word. But we have developed a society in which using the “n” word is generally considered offensive. I would like to develop a society in which transgenders are given a similar level of respect in terms of what names we used for them. I don’t have the right, ever, to insist that upon you or anyone else, but my goal is that we will get there of our own free will. 

[Engorgeous George 2,164]

5 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Fair question. 

Legally we don’t and should not have the right to insist that you be respectful of others in the way that we would like you to be. For example there should never, IMO, be a law that prohibits you from using the “n” word. But we have developed a society in which using the “n” word is generally considered offensive. I would like to develop a society in which transgenders are given a similar level of respect in terms of what names we used for them. I don’t have the right, ever, to insist that upon you or anyone else, but my goal is that we will get there of our own free will. 

So "insist" was a poor choice of words? Fair enough.

[Tree of Knowledge 1,728]

 

 

[Strike 5,261]

14 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Fair question. 

Legally we don’t and should not have the right to insist that you be respectful of others in the way that we would like you to be. For example there should never, IMO, be a law that prohibits you from using the “n” word. But we have developed a society in which using the “n” word is generally considered offensive. I would like to develop a society in which transgenders are given a similar level of respect in terms of what names we used for them. I don’t have the right, ever, to insist that upon you or anyone else, but my goal is that we will get there of our own free will. 

So you think calling a biological male "he" is the same as calling an AA the N word?  To the point of justifying a physical altercation? 

[Fireballer 2,639]

5 minutes ago, Strike said:

So you think calling a biological male "he" is the same as calling an AA the N word?  To the point of justifying a physical altercation? 

Hmmm…one is based on a long standing societal norm and one is racist as fuk.  Yeah, exactly the same.

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,247]

26 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Fair question. 

Legally we don’t and should not have the right to insist that you be respectful of others in the way that we would like you to be. For example there should never, IMO, be a law that prohibits you from using the “n” word. But we have developed a society in which using the “n” word is generally considered offensive. I would like to develop a society in which transgenders are given a similar level of respect in terms of what names we used for them. I don’t have the right, ever, to insist that upon you or anyone else, but my goal is that we will get there of our own free will. 

I have no problem calling a chick with d1ck a mentally unstable her. I will refuse to ever call anyone a they

[The Real timschochet 6,512]

42 minutes ago, Engorgeous George said:

So "insist" was a poor choice of words? Fair enough.

No. It wasn’t. I can insist something but I don’t have the right to enforce it. 

[The Real timschochet 6,512]

33 minutes ago, Strike said:

So you think calling a biological male "he" is the same as calling an AA the N word?  To the point of justifying a physical altercation? 

Instigating the use of force? No. 

[The Real timschochet 6,512]

27 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

Hmmm…one is based on a long standing societal norm and one is racist as fuk.  Yeah, exactly the same.

The n word was a long standing societal norm for decades. 

[Fireballer 2,639]

18 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

The n word was a long standing societal norm for decades. 

No it wasn’t.  

[Strike 5,261]

28 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Instigating the use of force? No. 

What about the N word?  Is a physical altercation justified when someone calls an AA the N word?

[The Real timschochet 6,512]

6 minutes ago, Strike said:

What about the N word?  Is a physical altercation justified when someone calls an AA the N word?

No. 

[The Real timschochet 6,512]

13 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

No it wasn’t.  

Of course it was. 

[Fireballer 2,639]

2 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Of course it was. 

Tim, societal norms are widely accepted as good and correct. It’s never been seen that way.  It’s always been derogatory.  Just because it may have been used more frequently by idiots, doesn’t make it a norm.