supermike80 1,795 Posted January 24 Im fine with this 4 years of Trump, followed by 8 years of Vance. Will be a glorious run Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Real timschochet 6,391 Posted January 24 1 minute ago, squistion said: Yup. That is why your favorite member of Congress, Maxine Waters, keeps getting elected (her constituents love her). Sure. But that’s the prerogative of her constituents. Why shouldn’t they have that right? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
squistion 1,944 Posted January 24 3 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said: Sure. But that’s the prerogative of her constituents. Why shouldn’t they have that right? Did I suggest they shouldn't have that right? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,113 Posted January 24 9 minutes ago, TheNewGirl said: TRUMP!!!!! TG he won or there wouldn’t even be a country. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 14,906 Posted January 24 Meanwhile , President Trump is on the ground in North Carolina in the disaster zone. Losers like Turd Guy and the others would rather get their panties in a bunch over a legislative boogey man because the truth is so painful for them. President Trump is the peoples President. We are seeing it today and everyday. Popular vote, electoral landslide. Suck it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Real timschochet 6,391 Posted January 24 8 minutes ago, squistion said: Did I suggest they shouldn't have that right? It was a rhetorical question. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TrailGuy 552 Posted January 24 6 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said: Meanwhile , President Trump is on the ground in North Carolina in the disaster zone. Losers like Turd Guy and the others would rather get their panties in a bunch over a legislative boogey man because the truth is so painful for them. President Trump is the peoples President. We are seeing it today and everyday. Popular vote, electoral landslide. Suck it. Conditions on aid to California (blue state) No conditions on aid to North Carolina (red state) MAN OF THE PEOPLE Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 6,548 Posted January 24 10 minutes ago, TrailGuy said: Conditions on aid to California (blue state) No conditions on aid to North Carolina (red state) MAN OF THE PEOPLE The conditions on Cali for fire mitigation are pretty obvious, and they get fires often. What could NC do to mitigate damage from a once in a century hurricane? It's an honest question. When I was 5 yrs old my hometown was destroyed by Hurricane Agnes. Quote The most significant effects, by far, occurred in Pennsylvania, mostly due to intense flooding. The tropical storm severely flooded the Susquehanna River and the Lackawanna River causing major damage to the Wilkes-Barre/Scranton metropolitan area. In both Pennsylvania and New Jersey combined, about 43,594 structures were either destroyed or significantly damaged. In Canada, a mobile home was toppled, killing two people. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Agnes Afterward, levees on the Susquehanna were raised. It also came out that a lot of tributaries that could have taken water were not properly cleared, and that was resolved. Five years later, another hurricane came through and, because of the above measures, the river didn't flood. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 14,906 Posted January 24 20 minutes ago, TrailGuy said: Conditions on aid to California (blue state) No conditions on aid to North Carolina (red state) MAN OF THE PEOPLE Some states are more irresponsible than others. It’s the proper way to handle it. They can always turn down the aid. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 3,828 Posted January 24 11 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said: Some states are more irresponsible than others. It’s the proper way to handle it. They can always turn down the aid. Weren't the Communists in California just gloating and bragging about how much money they had? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HellToupee 1,583 Posted January 24 1 hour ago, Fnord said: No, No, and no! NONONONONONONO Term limits for everyone, especially SCOTUS. I agree with this guy Failing term limits I wouldn’t let anyone run for reelection over 72 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Death 300 Posted January 24 5 hours ago, BufordT said: Hypothetically, IF they somehow get the 3rd term thing passed, could we be looking at a Trump vs Obama matchup in 2028? No, because it excludes former presidents who served two consecutive terms. Such baloney. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Death 300 Posted January 24 31 minutes ago, HellToupee said: I agree with this guy Failing term limits I wouldn’t let anyone run for reelection over 72 I'm fine if the oldest they can run is 72. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
weepaws 3,150 Posted January 24 60 should be the age limit to run for President. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheNewGirl 1,339 Posted January 24 The conditions included additional funding for fire prevention; an extra $1 Billion. Dems turned it down. Newsom also "expects" to be reimbursed the $2.5 billion that they did grant. Why would you vote against additional prevention funding? https://www.mymotherlode.com/news/local/3491212/ca-gop-1-billion-wildfire-prevention-proposal-denied.html Quote Sacramento, CA — A $2.5 billion relief package was approved by the California legislature today to help those impacted by the fires that have devastated Los Angeles. Republicans in the Assembly called for adding an additional $ 1 billion for wildfire prevention. GOP leader James Gallagher argued, “The next fire isn’t just around the corner, it is already burning,” referencing additional fires that have been reported in Los Angeles over the past 24 hours. He added, “Wildfire prevention is a glaring omission from the relief package being passed today.” Mother Lode Republican Assemblyman, David Tangipa, noted, “Addressing the symptom, we have to go after the disease of mismanagement and dereliction. It is our ability to do so right now.” The proposal to add the $1 billion did not have enough support from Democrats to pass. The $2.5 billion that was approved will help support response and recovery efforts in Southern California. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jonmx 2,424 Posted January 24 Term limits for elected representatives are a waste of time when the real power and corruption is with unelected bureacracies. Maybe we should limit federal employment to less than 20 years. Hopefully Trump can defang the beast. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jbycho 579 Posted January 24 14 minutes ago, jonmx said: Term limits for elected representatives are a waste of time when the real power and corruption is with unelected bureacracies. Maybe we should limit federal employment to less than 20 years. Hopefully Trump can defang the beast. Liberals are scared because they know that Trump is going to clean up their mess and would easily be reelected in the election. They want their DEI and illegals back!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TrailGuy 552 Posted January 25 On 1/24/2025 at 7:21 AM, BufordT said: Hypothetically, IF they somehow get the 3rd term thing passed, could we be looking at a Trump vs Obama matchup in 2028? The way they worded the amendment it excludes Obama but includes Trump “No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than three times, nor be elected to any additional term after being elected to two consecutive terms.’’ Such children Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jbycho 579 Posted January 25 6 minutes ago, TrailGuy said: The way they worded the amendment it excludes Obama but includes Trump “No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than three times, nor be elected to any additional term after being elected to two consecutive terms.’’ Such children Cool. I'm for it. Obama is divisive and he sucked. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mufaletta 70 Posted January 29 Could be quite interesting. In FDR's fourth run, he won the electoral college count 432 to 99 Trump already has 3 consecutive elections with sufficient valid votes to win the electoral in each one. Could he surpass 432 in 2028? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
weepaws 3,150 Posted April 19 Indiana passes law banning men from competing in woman’s collegiate sports. John 14:30. I will no longer talk much with you, for the ruler of the world is coming, and he has nothing in Me. Indeed Amen Thanks Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Psychic Observer 495 Posted April 24 They're selling the gear now. https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/24/trump-2028-apparel-fuels-third-white-house-term-questions.html Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
posty 2,609 Posted April 24 God help us if he gets a third term… Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jbycho 579 Posted April 24 13 minutes ago, posty said: God help us if he gets a third term… You do the help. That's evident. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iam90sbaby 2,472 Posted April 24 I actually don’t think 8 years is a long enough time to really get anything done. I think you should be able to serve 3 terms or increase a term from 4 to 6 years. I also think the people begging for term limits on every single position of government are kind of retarded. Having that much turnover in government would be terrible and almost impossible to have a clear direction. Do any of you actually think about what these things would do or do you just like to say stuff that sounds good on paper? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 5,181 Posted Thursday at 09:34 PM Its a nice thought, but really a bit too much. Looks like we finally have a vote where the idiot Democrats can make themselves useful. Come 2028, we'll let the Dems try to convince us that JD Vance is worse than both Hitler and Trump combined. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
posty 2,609 Posted Thursday at 09:41 PM 31 minutes ago, iam90sbaby said: I actually don’t think 8 years is a long enough time to really get anything done. I think you should be able to serve 3 terms or increase a term from 4 to 6 years. I also think the people begging for term limits on every single position of government are kind of retarded. Having that much turnover in government would be terrible and almost impossible to have a clear direction. Do any of you actually think about what these things would do or do you just like to say stuff that sounds good on paper? Would you have wanted this when Obama was president? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
posty 2,609 Posted Thursday at 09:42 PM Personally I think one six-year term for President would be sufficient... That way when someone becomes President, they won't spend two-thirds of their first term running for the second term... 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iam90sbaby 2,472 Posted Thursday at 09:52 PM 9 minutes ago, posty said: Would you have wanted this when Obama was president? I’ve always thought terms should be longer. You can’t get sh!t done in 8 years especially when everything gets gridlocked in congress/senate. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 374 Posted Thursday at 09:59 PM 24 minutes ago, Voltaire said: Come 2028, we'll let the Dems try to convince us that JD Vance is worse than both Hitler and Trump combined. I don't think any Congressional Dems have ever compared Trump to Hitler. You know who did? Vance. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GobbleDog 976 Posted Thursday at 11:06 PM 1 hour ago, posty said: Personally I think one six-year term for President would be sufficient... That way when someone becomes President, they won't spend two-thirds of their first term running for the second term... I've championed this idea for decades. When faced with good for country vs good for re-election decisions... they sell us down the river every time. And they all do it - Republicans and Democrats. The Presidency is too powerful of position to allow that conflict of interest. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Horseman 2,353 Posted Thursday at 11:19 PM 1 hour ago, SaintsInDome2006 said: I don't think any Congressional Dems have ever compared Trump to Hitler. You know who did? Vance. You're a bonafide moron. Comparing the tactics of Donald Trump to Mussolini and Hitler is a very legitimate thing.” Former Speaker of the American House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi told the Brendan O’Connor Show she thinks Donald Trump’s conduct on the campaign trail is “the tactic of an authoritarian”. Vice President Harris: “Trump said he wanted generals like Adolf Hitler had. He wants a military that is not loyal to the Constitution, but loyal to him... This is a window into who Donald Trump really is from the people who know him best” It was the fourth time in the past six weeks that Biden’s campaign has likened Trump’s remarks to Hitler’s in written statements and probably not the last. The president’s team has been ramping up attacks on Trump as it barrels toward a likely rematch with him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 374 Posted Thursday at 11:35 PM 15 minutes ago, Horseman said: Vice President Harris: “Trump said he wanted generals like Adolf Hitler had. He wants a military that is not loyal to the Constitution, but loyal to him... This is a window into who Donald Trump really is from the people who know him best” I don't know what to tell you, Trump said that. That's a problem for his supporters not for Harris. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 374 Posted Thursday at 11:36 PM 16 minutes ago, Horseman said: Comparing the tactics of Donald Trump to Mussolini and Hitler is a very legitimate thing.” Former Speaker of the American House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi told the Brendan O’Connor Show she thinks Donald Trump’s conduct on the campaign trail is “the tactic of an authoritarian”. Ok that's a fair point, I stand corrected. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Horseman 2,353 Posted Thursday at 11:37 PM Just now, SaintsInDome2006 said: I don't know what to tell you, Trump said that. That's a problem for his supporters not for Harris. And quit editing posts changing the context tool. You need serious help. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 374 Posted Thursday at 11:39 PM Just now, Horseman said: And quit editing posts changing the context tool. There's no context to insults and vulgarity. I try to show respect in my responses to you so I leave that stuff out. I'm sure you're a decent person who loves his country. Cheers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seafoam1 2,797 Posted Friday at 12:32 AM 51 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said: There's no context to insults and vulgarity. I try to show respect in my responses to you so I leave that stuff out. I'm sure you're a decent person who loves his country. Cheers. I would vote for Trump if he could be elected for a third term. I actually hope it happens. But I don't think it will. So....VANCE 2028!! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reality 3,092 Posted Friday at 01:06 AM You can't really take the opinions of liberals seriously, they proudly voted for a regime that chose to make our country extremely unsafe by not protecting our border. It will take decades to recover. They don't put our country first. It won't happen but, I would gladly take 4 additional years from Trump compared to anything the left has to offer. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 14,906 Posted Friday at 01:18 AM 9 minutes ago, Reality said: You can't really take the opinions of liberals seriously, they proudly voted for a regime that chose to make our country extremely unsafe by not protecting our border. It will take decades to recover. They don't put our country first. It won't happen but, I would gladly take 4 additional years from Trump compared to anything the left has to offer. Exactly. Opening up the floodgates and not even checking who they let in is the worst thing I have ever seen our government do to this country. It’s even worse than the wars they have lied about. In the middle of a pandemic no less. And they make us pay for it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jbycho 579 Posted Friday at 01:20 AM 2 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said: Exactly. Opening up the floodgates and not even checking who they let in is the worst thing I have ever seen our government do to this country. It’s even worse than the wars they have lied about. In the middle of a pandemic no less. And they make us pay for it. Liberals... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites