Jump to content
Cdub100

Coronavirus - Doomsday

Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, Ultra Max Power said:

The Dubai study was shared by Dr. Mobeen during a youtube lecture, I'll have to dig back into my phone and find that one.  

 

Here is an article on unsetting natural immunity. 

Yes, Covid Vaccines UNSET and ERASE Natural Immunity (substack.com)

 

21 minutes ago, Ultra Max Power said:

Both of these are primarily on infection.  Got anything on hospitalization or death?  For one, I’m admitting that the vaccine has limited and possibly no effectiveness against Omicron infection (although technically your second link seems to claim that their study found the bivalent vaccine was 30% effective but I’m honestly not sure how they got that).  Data on infection is also easily confounded as it’s highly likely that vaccinated folks are more likely to test.

And your first link was also only on children.  I think if there’s one thing we learned from this pandemic, it’s that Covid’s impact on children should not be extrapolated to the rest of the population (and vice versa).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

 

Both of these are on infection only.  Got anything on hospitalization or death?  For one, I’m admitting that the vaccine has limited and possibly no effectiveness against Omicron infection (although technically your second link seems to claim that their study found the bivalent vaccine was 30% effective but I’m honestly not sure how they got that).  Data on infection is also easily confounded as it’s highly likely that vaccinated folks are more likely to test.

And your first link was also only on children.  I think if there’s one thing we learned from this pandemic, it’s that Covid’s impact on children should not be extrapolated to the rest of the population (and vice versa).

Get your boosters or shut up. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

Tim you should stop. You’re a science denier

If you're referring to not getting a booster, or even more specifically, the bivalent booster, the CDC is the one denying science.   Although I'm sure that will result in you saying then you shouldn't trust anything the CDC says.  Which is fine I guess, but a lot of what they have said has been backed up by data.  Just not the boosters for young people.  And the bivalent booster has pretty much no data.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

If you're referring to not getting a booster, or even more specifically, the bivalent booster, the CDC is the one denying science.   Although I'm sure that will result in you saying then you shouldn't trust anything the CDC says.  Which is fine I guess, but a lot of what they have said has been backed up by data.  Just not the boosters for young people.  And the bivalent booster has pretty much no data.

Oh.  So there was a ton of data when the vaccine first rolled out. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Christmas Ever party at my cousins. My aunt showed up with a sore throat. Decides to test after everyone leaves.....

Everyone at the party. Like 15 people got covid, except my son and I who had it January 2022. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The vaccines are dumb, but that may be dumber.  'Shield Protector' :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Apparently defense against vaccine shedding is an entire new industry

 

 

 

Apparently metal helmet guy is suprised to learn snake oil salesmen still exist.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Horseman said:

Apparently metal helmet guy is suprised to learn snake oil salesmen still exist.  

😂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, Drizzay said:

The vaccines are dumb, but that may be dumber.  'Shield Protector' :lol:

Yeah, I wish we could just laugh at people like this but many take them seriously. Peters is the producer of the “Died Suddenly” “documentary,” and McCullough likes to brag about being “the most published cardiologist ever” or something. At least people are starting to see through the grift.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great thread on the “epidemic of athletes dying suddenly” claim:

 

To summarize:

The claim of there were “only 1101 athlete deaths in 38 years” (29 per year) is from a paper that wasn’t even trying to find out that number.

There was a paper from 2009 that did try to find the number for US athlete deaths, but only counted sudden deaths of athletes under 40 (not including recreational).  This paper found a rate of 50-76 per year in the US, A number that had been steadily increasing.

This tweeter apparently went through every single one of the deaths from the blog (yes, Peter McCullough was citing a blog).  Of the 970 events listed from 2022, only 36 could be confirmed as meeting  the same qualifications from the study. 24 had insufficient information and the rest would not have qualified.

Boom

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Great thread on the “epidemic of athletes dying suddenly” claim:

 

To summarize:

The claim of there were “only 1101 athlete deaths in 38 years” (29 per year) is from a paper that wasn’t even trying to find out that number.

There was a paper from 2009 that did try to find the number for US athlete deaths, but only counted sudden deaths of athletes under 40 (not including recreational).  This paper found a rate of 50-76 per year in the US, A number that had been steadily increasing.

This tweeter apparently went through every single one of the deaths from the blog (yes, Peter McCullough was citing a blog).  Of the 970 events listed from 2022, only 36 could be confirmed as meeting  the same qualifications from the study. 24 had insufficient information and the rest would not have qualified.

Boom

 

 

science denier

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only people that piss me off more than the Lord Fauci worshiping,  wears masks by themselves in a car, weirdo Karens of the world are the "Da Jab" guys.  JFC ya'll apply even worse logic and common sense.   I guess for every debit there has to be a credit to offset the natural timeline of luncacy. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, TimHauck said:

“Courageous discourse,” lol

 

 

 

Get your booster or stfu 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, craftsman said:

Child star Adam Rich, best known for his time on ABC's "Eight Is Enough," is dead, Fox News Digital can confirm.

Another covid "vaccine" victim?

A cause of death has not yet been revealed. 🤔

First of all he was 54 so not exactly a spring chicken.  And of course they released no details about his death so there is any number of causes that it could be.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tim Hack's heros, all together. Also there are a few other complete idiots in here that still l believe these lairs.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, craftsman said:

Child star Adam Rich, best known for his time on ABC's "Eight Is Enough," is dead, Fox News Digital can confirm.

Another covid "vaccine" victim?

A cause of death has not yet been revealed. 🤔

I love when they tout the jab juice and then drop dead from it.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Instant disqualification. Anyone that believes what idiots like this say, are even bigger idiots.

Jonathan Laxton MD, FRCPC
@dr_jon_l
 
 Internal Medicine physician and asst. professor of medicine  he/him. Dealing with disinformation. My views are my own.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, lod001 said:

Tim Hack's heros, all together. Also there are a few other complete idiots in here that still l believe these lairs.

 

I’d argue that Gates and Bourla’s statements are not wrong.

Rachel Maddow is no one’s hero.

Yes, Fauci/Biden/Walensky were wrong.  I do know that most of the time Fauci did usually use the “95% effective” caveat though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, lod001 said:

Instant disqualification. Anyone that believes what idiots like this say, are even bigger idiots.

Jonathan Laxton MD, FRCPC
@dr_jon_l
 
 Internal Medicine physician and asst. professor of medicine  he/him. Dealing with disinformation. My views are my own.

In other words, you got nothin’

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, TimHauck said:

I’d argue that Gates and Bourla’s statements are not wrong.

Rachel Maddow is no one’s hero.

Yes, Fauci/Biden/Walensky were wrong.  I do know that most of the time Fauci did usually use the “95% effective” caveat though.

🤣 Just showing the world what a complete idiot you continue to be. You have totally lost this whole argument from day one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

In other words, you got nothin’

You've had nothing from day 1.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

The gig is up lod, even the GC has admitted that Peter McCullough is a joke

No, just the idiots in the GC that continue to think the garbage is "safe & effective".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, lod001 said:

No, just the idiots in the GC that continue to think the garbage is "safe & effective".

Nope, read up a few posts 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, TimHauck said:

Wait, is this article claiming the CDC did no VAERS analysis until March 2022?  Lol

If you'd like to stay relevant here, it's best you not read it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

Wait, is this article claiming the CDC did no VAERS analysis until March 2022?  Lol

Did you get your booster yet? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, BudBro said:

If you'd like to stay relevant here, it's best you not read it.

Do you think the CDC did not analyze VAERS reports until March 2022?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Do you think the CDC did not analyze VAERS reports until March 2022?

Of course they did.  As you read, there isn't any reason this mRna stuff should continue.  It'd be ok to suspend it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×