Cloaca du jour 2,148 Posted April 17, 2020 https://www.wsj.com/articles/ruths-chris-steak-house-gets-20-million-from-coronavirus-aid-program-11586895864 Sba working as intended? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
supermike80 1,887 Posted April 17, 2020 15 minutes ago, Cloaca du jour said: https://www.wsj.com/articles/ruths-chris-steak-house-gets-20-million-from-coronavirus-aid-program-11586895864 Sba working as intended? They do employ people. Whats the issue? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NorthernVike 2,083 Posted April 17, 2020 I thought the PPP was for employers with less than 500 employees. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cloaca du jour 2,148 Posted April 17, 2020 2 minutes ago, NorthernVike said: I thought the PPP was for employers with less than 500 employees. My thoughts also...hence the post. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
supermike80 1,887 Posted April 17, 2020 How many employees do they have? I have no clue. I cant read the article...paywall Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gladiators 1,983 Posted April 17, 2020 Link says 5,000 total employees. Perhaps they're a franchise and the franchisees applied for the funds at the restaurant level. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vuduchile 1,945 Posted April 17, 2020 1 hour ago, NorthernVike said: I thought the PPP was for employers with less than 500 employees. Are these restaurants franchises? If so, the individual franchise groups could qualify with less than 500 employees. If so, why would they report it as a total $ figure? Something is off here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vuduchile 1,945 Posted April 17, 2020 19 minutes ago, Gladiators said: Link says 5,000 total employees. Perhaps they're a franchise and the franchisees applied for the funds at the restaurant level. Beat me to it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Utilit99 4,099 Posted April 17, 2020 8 minutes ago, vuduchile said: Are these restaurants franchises? If so, the individual franchise groups could qualify with less than 500 employees. If so, why would they report it as a total $ figure? Something is off here. Ruth's Chris Steak House has a franchise fee of up to $150,000, with a total initial investment range of $2,539,500 to $5,932,500. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 6,580 Posted April 17, 2020 They don't deliver Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NorthernVike 2,083 Posted April 17, 2020 The article says SBA funds. Now If that is a SBA loan, then the article is misleading. Imagine that, fake news. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vuduchile 1,945 Posted April 17, 2020 Can anyone cut and paste the full article? This just doesn't add up. A public company of that size is not eligible for PPP. The first line of the article says: The owner of the high-end Ruth’s Chris Steak House chain is among the first public companies to disclose it has received a government-backed loan to keep people on its payroll. How does a public company have an owner? Isn't there a CEO, a board and shareholders instead of a single owner? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Big Guy 1,412 Posted April 17, 2020 I have no clue what this is all about but I say SHUT IT DOWN!!!! Simply because of the name, I hate it! Shouldn't it be Ruth's & Chris's Steakhouse? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vuduchile 1,945 Posted April 17, 2020 More to the story here. So, maybe Chase was in cahoots with these chains? I still don't fully understand how these loans got through. If ALL restaurants were eligible regardless of size, this is yet another example of how poorly this thing was administered. https://nypost.com/2020/04/17/potbellys-ruths-chris-snag-coronavirus-loans-meant-for-small-business/?utm_medium=SocialFlow&utm_campaign=SocialFlow&sr_share=facebook&utm_source=NYPFacebook&fbclid=IwAR0cPc9a4Fnhs_fwaE9DpVsqwp6I750eCPjNEx-4NVPTZqMnH0gsxz0x-r4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,894 Posted April 17, 2020 As of February 28, 2020, it had approximately 150 company-owned and franchisee-owned restaurants worldwide. PPP changed the rules that said 500 people per location. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vuduchile 1,945 Posted April 17, 2020 15 minutes ago, Cdub100 said: As of February 28, 2020, it had approximately 150 company-owned and franchisee-owned restaurants worldwide. PPP changed the rules that said 500 people per location. So what did the rule change to? I’m confused. A single location doesn’t employ anywhere near 500 people. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mookz 1,342 Posted April 17, 2020 5 hours ago, Big Guy said: I have no clue what this is all about but I say SHUT IT DOWN!!!! Simply because of the name, I hate it! Shouldn't it be Ruth's & Chris's Steakhouse? Thank you Big Guy, I've never understood the name. Ruth's Chris? Ruth owns Chris? And it's hard to say. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,894 Posted April 17, 2020 2 minutes ago, vuduchile said: So what did the rule change to? I’m confused. A single location doesn’t employ anywhere near 500 people. It was you couldn't have more than 500 employees which in total Ruth Chris has more then. The rule changed to say 500 employees per location. Of which Ruth doesn't have more than 500 per location Step 3. Profit. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
taco breath 424 Posted April 17, 2020 can we get back to the steaks? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KayJay1971 239 Posted April 17, 2020 7 hours ago, Big Guy said: I have no clue what this is all about but I say SHUT IT DOWN!!!! Simply because of the name, I hate it! Shouldn't it be Ruth's & Chris's Steakhouse? Over four decades ago, Ruth Fertel, a divorced mother of two, mortgaged her home for $22,000 to buy a small 60-seat restaurant in New Orleans, Louisiana named Chris Steak House. Shortly thereafter, a fire forced her to change the original location and she renamed the restaurant, “Ruth's Chris Steak House.” 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Big Guy 1,412 Posted April 18, 2020 2 hours ago, KayJay1971 said: Over four decades ago, Ruth Fertel, a divorced mother of two, mortgaged her home for $22,000 to buy a small 60-seat restaurant in New Orleans, Louisiana named Chris Steak House. Shortly thereafter, a fire forced her to change the original location and she renamed the restaurant, “Ruth's Chris Steak House.” that's messed up! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vuduchile 1,945 Posted April 18, 2020 4 hours ago, Cdub100 said: It was you couldn't have more than 500 employees which in total Ruth Chris has more then. The rule changed to say 500 employees per location. Of which Ruth doesn't have more than 500 per location Step 3. Profit. What a colossal fock up. It’s no wonder why the money ran out so fast. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cruzer 1,995 Posted April 18, 2020 1 hour ago, vuduchile said: What a colossal fock up. It’s no wonder why the money ran out so fast. Utterly moronic. This rivals the Hurricane Katrina mismanagement cluster fock. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,789 Posted April 18, 2020 I don't like baseball cut Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,789 Posted April 18, 2020 Trump Fires Watchdog Overseeing $2 Trillion in Coronavirus Stimulus Funds. One of Democrats’ most critical hang-ups in passing Senate Republicans’ draft of the coronavirus stimulus package was that the president and Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin would oversee a $500 billion slush fund for businesses, leading to concerns that Trump would dip into the money to bail out his own struggling resorts and hotels. During the process, Trump assured Americans that he could handle the task responsibly: “I’ll be the oversight,” he told reporters in one of his coronavirus press conferences Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,282 Posted April 18, 2020 Same shite all over again. Let’s hope there is some sort of clawback. I believe the loans can be forgiven, but don’t have to be. ......Wtf am I kidding? Banker man gets fat, working man gets thin. It’s all happened before, it will happen again. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Intense Observer 344 Posted April 19, 2020 22 hours ago, Cruzer said: Utterly moronic. This rivals the Hurricane Katrina mismanagement cluster fock. How is it mismanaged? Other than not having enough funding and Democrats taking a vacation rather than refunding it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Intense Observer 344 Posted April 19, 2020 21 hours ago, wiffleball said: Trump Fires Watchdog Overseeing $2 Trillion in Coronavirus Stimulus Funds. One of Democrats’ most critical hang-ups in passing Senate Republicans’ draft of the coronavirus stimulus package was that the president and Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin would oversee a $500 billion slush fund for businesses, leading to concerns that Trump would dip into the money to bail out his own struggling resorts and hotels. During the process, Trump assured Americans that he could handle the task responsibly: “I’ll be the oversight,” he told reporters in one of his coronavirus press conferences More fake news wishcasting by wiff. It was $2.5 trillion bailout. $500 billion to corporations, who provide jobs, that are being forced to close right now. What is the problem? Worried Trump Hotels might get a slice? If Hilton, Starwood, Marriot, casinos get a piece why shouldn't Trump Hotels? As for oversight, Trump appointed Brian Miller to the Special IG for Pandemic Recovery position. He spent 10 years as the IG of GSA, which arguably makes him more experienced than anyone else in the country for this job. He was unanimously approved by the Senate in 2005. You can tell the fake news sites from the real news sites because they refer to him as "Trump's lawyer" rather than "former 10 year GSA IG" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,894 Posted April 19, 2020 2 hours ago, Intense Observer said: How is it mismanaged? Other than not having enough funding and Democrats taking a vacation rather than refunding it. The money needed to deploy ASAP. People love to play armchair QB 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frozenbeernuts 2,239 Posted April 19, 2020 On 4/17/2020 at 3:33 PM, Mookz said: Thank you Big Guy, I've never understood the name. Ruth's Chris? Ruth owns Chris? And it's hard to say. If I were to take a guess, it would be named after a woman's son. Ruth's *son Chris Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vuduchile 1,945 Posted April 20, 2020 Steak Shack is returning millions in CARE act funds that they don't actually need. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/shake-shack-gets-funding-return-063901675.html Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dain11279 969 Posted April 20, 2020 9 minutes ago, vuduchile said: Steak Shack is returning millions in CARE act funds that they don't actually need. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/shake-shack-gets-funding-return-063901675.html Good on them 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vuduchile 1,945 Posted April 24, 2020 They’re giving it back, but only after major backlash. Corporste swine. Chase was the lender to both Ruth’s Chris and Shake Shack https://www.yahoo.com/news/facing-furor-ruths-chris-high-202108065.html Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KSB2424 3,148 Posted April 24, 2020 This is an open ended question. Don't most chain restaurants have franchise owners, where that owner is of one location (maybe a couple) but give a percentage kickback to the "chain". Those Franchisee's would be small business owners, no? I guess what I'm asking is are the chains applying for the loans to disperse to all of the individual franchisee's to float payroll and stay in business? If so, I see no problem. If the corporate chain is applying for funds to pocket then cash, the fock them. However I think that caveat is the tipping scale. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vuduchile 1,945 Posted April 24, 2020 21 minutes ago, KSB2424 said: This is an open ended question. Don't most chain restaurants have franchise owners, where that owner is of one location (maybe a couple) but give a percentage kickback to the "chain". Those Franchisee's would be small business owners, no? I guess what I'm asking is are the chains applying for the loans to disperse to all of the individual franchisee's to float payroll and stay in business? If so, I see no problem. If the corporate chain is applying for funds to pocket then cash, the fock them. However I think that caveat is the tipping scale. Publicly traded companies who’ve spent millions on stock buybacks in the last year are not cash strapped small business. Period. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KSB2424 3,148 Posted April 24, 2020 5 minutes ago, vuduchile said: Publicly traded companies who’ve spent millions on stock buybacks in the last year are not cash strapped small business. Period. I'm not arguing with you, just asking a question. I know two people who are franchise owners. They aren't exactly loaded. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alias Detective 1,394 Posted April 24, 2020 On 4/19/2020 at 1:11 AM, Frozenbeernuts said: If I were to take a guess, it would be named after a woman's son. Ruth's *son Chris Bad guess.. lol. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Alias Detective 1,394 Posted April 24, 2020 10 hours ago, KSB2424 said: I'm not arguing with you, just asking a question. I know two people who are franchise owners. They aren't exactly loaded. What franchise? I know a mcDonalds owner, Buffalo Wild Wings owner, and a Burger King owner. all do quite well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bill E. 703 Posted April 24, 2020 They are only loans if you do not use it for payroll. I know a lawyer who got ppp and he is his only employee. As long as it goes to his own salary he does not have to pay it back. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mookz 1,342 Posted April 24, 2020 On 4/17/2020 at 6:05 PM, KayJay1971 said: Over four decades ago, Ruth Fertel, a divorced mother of two, mortgaged her home for $22,000 to buy a small 60-seat restaurant in New Orleans, Louisiana named Chris Steak House. Shortly thereafter, a fire forced her to change the original location and she renamed the restaurant, “Ruth's Chris Steak House.” "Chris Steak House" is already a weird name. But fine. If it was so iconic that she didn't want to change the name, she didn't have to add her own name to it. And if she did have to do that, once they started expanding to other states that have never heard of Chris Steak House, then she could have changed it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites