Jump to content
RaiderHaters Revenge

Roe V Wade overturned!!! Leaked, SCOTUS SHOULD BE IMPEACHED

Recommended Posts

55 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

I guess you missed that show called Seinfeld?  You should check it out. It was kinda popular. You humorless piece of cardboard. 

:huh:

I probably saw it 25 years ago 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Djgb13 said:

Don’t the ppl who live in that state vote for that? Yea that’s what I thought. Dumbest focking comment so far. This is the typical level of intelligence you deal with when it comes to liberals :doh: 

Some do vote for it others don’t. Aren’t abortion restrictions an example of the government telling you what you can and can’t do with your own body? If you like a nanny government making decisions for you I guess that’s fine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

He seems like a swell guy:

 

 


 

 

He’s such an immature frat boy. Someone should straighten him out. He has a platform for being outspoken.  Fine. Doing this crap isn’t how you get taken seriously. And it’s not even funny. A worn out cliché. Is like when MDC says his stupid “both sides suck” thing for the millionth time. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

He seems like a swell guy:

 

 


 

 

Sounds like your typical Geek.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

He seems like a swell guy:

 

 


 

 

 

9 minutes ago, MDC said:

Sounds like your typical Geek.

I think it's an interesting question, maybe that makes me a typical Geek.  Many of these Leftist positions are "luxury beliefs" which I've defined several times before; google it if you are interested.  :thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, MDC said:

Some do vote for it others don’t. Aren’t abortion restrictions an example of the government telling you what you can and can’t do with your own body? If you like a nanny government making decisions for you I guess that’s fine.

:doh: The guy who advocates for more government is all of a sudden against it making decisions for you 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, when are we going to skip this baby bullsh@t, and finally decide it's legal to kill women. I mean, it's sooooo overdue.

The coverup of forensic evidence is expensive, dagnabbit. :mad:

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

He seems like a swell guy:

 

 


 

 

No dating app matches?

Shows how dumb Gaetz is.

An actual wildebeest would get a hundred matches a day. Guys swipe on EVERYTHING

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

He seems like a swell guy:

 

 


 

 

The geek club has made it possible to understand how this guy can be a representative of other people.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
55 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

He seems like a swell guy:

 

 


 

 

It's hilarious because it's true.  The best comedy are the ones that hit home.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

The geek club has made it possible to understand how this guy can be a representative of other people.

who is your ideal candidate?

Bernie the pu55y?  Lizzy the Injun?

But a 30 something making a joke, is the end of the world

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

who is your ideal candidate?

Bernie the pu55y?  Lizzy the Injun?

But a 30 something making a joke, is the end of the world

 

Did he say it was the end of the world? I thought his point was Gates’s tweet was pretty douchey and unbecoming of a member of the United States Congress :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MDC said:

Some do vote for it others don’t. Aren’t abortion restrictions an example of the government telling you what you can and can’t do with your own body? If you like a nanny government making decisions for you I guess that’s fine.

Overturning Roe v Wade wouldn’t be an example of govt restrictions on abortion, though.  Rescinding a federally created right so that individual states can decide an issue for themselves is not, ipso facto, a restriction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, MDC said:

Aren’t states that restrict access to abortion telling their residents what they can and can’t do?

They are voted in. The people will decide. Dummy 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, MLCKAA said:

Overturning Roe v Wade wouldn’t be an example of govt restrictions on abortion, though.  Rescinding a federally created right so that individual states can decide an issue for themselves is not, ipso facto, a restriction.

The result of that ruling would be states telling their residents what they can and can’t do though.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, MLCKAA said:

Overturning Roe v Wade wouldn’t be an example of govt restrictions on abortion, though.  Rescinding a federally created right so that individual states can decide an issue for themselves is not, ipso facto, a restriction.

That's what I find so funny about this whole thing. The left is labeling this "an attack on our democracy." When in fact it is democracy in action. Something the left loathes. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

well hes not wrong

Yes he is:

1 hour ago, IGotWorms said:

No dating app matches?

Shows how dumb Gaetz is.

An actual wildebeest would get a hundred matches a day. Guys swipe on EVERYTHING

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Did he say it was the end of the world? I thought his point was Gates’s tweet was pretty douchey and unbecoming of a member of the United States Congress :dunno:

right but he never calls out douchey things anyone on the left says

bottom line the left thinks abortion is about controlling womens bodies, which it isnt 

therefore a discussion can never occur

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Reality said:

Best part of this entire situation, the left has finally solved biology.

 

Huh...I never took Newsom as a transaphobe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Article on search for leaker: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/04/us/politics/supreme-court-marshal-leak-investigation.html

 

But there are some obvious places Colonel Curley might start to look for clues.

The document Politico posted online appeared to be slightly askew, as if it had been placed hastily on a photocopy machine or scanner. The top left corner was dog-eared and looked as if a large staple were removed from the 98-page draft opinion. And the words “1st Draft” are highlighted in yellow — though it is not clear whether that was done with a highlighter pen or with a highlight feature on a word processor.

Those physical characteristics could help Colonel Curley track down the source of the leak.

Only some of the employees at the court would have had access to the document, according to people who have worked there in the past. Each justice has chambers downstairs, which include offices for their clerks, a personal secretary and a conference secretary, and one chamber aide. Each justice also has more offices for clerks upstairs in the court building.

Draft opinions are normally emailed to the offices of other justices and are sometimes printed and distributed among the justices, the clerks, and the conference secretaries. Each of them could potentially be a target for questioning.

. . .

Mr. Epps said it is not out of the question that the justices might share their work with family members. (A common conspiracy theory on Twitter — offered with no evidence — is that Ginni Thomas, a conservative political activist and the wife of Justice Clarence Thomas, leaked the draft.) And some people have mused online about the possibility that the court’s computers might have been hacked by someone who then gave the draft to Politico — though there is no public evidence of such an event.

There has also been much speculation about the authors of the Politico report, and whom they might know inside the court.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

thats a great article, I dont see how you would have a problem with it.  

I was pro-choice right up til the day my wife got pregnant and the thought of an abortion made me sick to my stomach

I was against cannabis as well until my dad got sick and I started doing RSO research

point is people have a personal experience and change their view on things all the time

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Pimpadeaux said:

I don't understand this post.  I vote R most of the time but agree with maybe 75% - 80% of the Conservative stances on issues, the majority but still.  Anyone who cannot think for themselves and just follows whatever one side of the isle believes is the very definition of a sheep.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Article on search for leaker: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/04/us/politics/supreme-court-marshal-leak-investigation.html

 

But there are some obvious places Colonel Curley might start to look for clues.

The document Politico posted online appeared to be slightly askew, as if it had been placed hastily on a photocopy machine or scanner. The top left corner was dog-eared and looked as if a large staple were removed from the 98-page draft opinion. And the words “1st Draft” are highlighted in yellow — though it is not clear whether that was done with a highlighter pen or with a highlight feature on a word processor.

Those physical characteristics could help Colonel Curley track down the source of the leak.

Only some of the employees at the court would have had access to the document, according to people who have worked there in the past. Each justice has chambers downstairs, which include offices for their clerks, a personal secretary and a conference secretary, and one chamber aide. Each justice also has more offices for clerks upstairs in the court building.

Draft opinions are normally emailed to the offices of other justices and are sometimes printed and distributed among the justices, the clerks, and the conference secretaries. Each of them could potentially be a target for questioning.

. . .

Mr. Epps said it is not out of the question that the justices might share their work with family members. (A common conspiracy theory on Twitter — offered with no evidence — is that Ginni Thomas, a conservative political activist and the wife of Justice Clarence Thomas, leaked the draft.) And some people have mused online about the possibility that the court’s computers might have been hacked by someone who then gave the draft to Politico — though there is no public evidence of such an event.

There has also been much speculation about the authors of the Politico report, and whom they might know inside the court.

So it was written in February?  Why would it just come out now?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

thats a great article, I dont see how you would have a problem with it.  

I was pro-choice right up til the day my wife got pregnant and the thought of an abortion made me sick to my stomach

I was against cannabis as well until my dad got sick and I started doing RSO research

point is people have a personal experience and change their view on things all the time

Where did I say I had a problem with it? I just noted that Clownzo is on record for being "very pro-choice."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, MDC said:

The result of that ruling would be states telling their residents what they can and can’t do though.

Look, there are tons of things states tell citizens they can’t do.  What’s the alternative to laws?  

I stand by what I said before.  Overturning Roe is not the govt restricting what people can do.  It merely changes span of control for the federal and state govts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I could be Pro-Life or Pro-Choice. the fock do I care. I can mouth the words as needed.

Point me in the direction of the people opposed to offshoring jobs, CRT, Trannie groomers in kindergarten, race riots,  and dumb focking wars. Oh, that's the Pro-Life side? Gimme a hat. Sorry about what I said earlier about creationism in schools. The Earth being 10000 years old is less worrysome than the boys can be girls stuff. The Alphabet people in schools is a bazillion times worse as are the CRT people. Yeah, yeah, I'll take the poster of Jesus killing a T-Rex with a bolt action rifle, too. Whatever it takes to keep those perverted creeps and race hustlers away from my kids.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, KSB2424 said:

I don't understand this post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Voltaire said:

I could be Pro-Life or Pro-Choice. the fock do I care. I can mouth the words as needed.

Point me in the direction of the people opposed to offshoring jobs, CRT, Trannie groomers in kindergarten, race riots,  and dumb focking wars. Oh, that's the Pro-Life side? Gimme a hat. Sorry about what I said earlier about creationism in schools. The CRT and Alphabet people in schools is a bazillion times worse. Yeah, yeah, I'll take the poster of Jesus killing a T-Rex with a bolt action rifle, too. Whatever it takes to keep those perverted creeps and race hustlers away from my kids.

How about we point to the country you support by living there? Geebus what a focking hypocrite you are. Go jerk off to Mao photos.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

I could be Pro-Life or Pro-Choice. the fock do I care. I can mouth the words as needed.

Point me in the direction of the people opposed to offshoring jobs, CRT, Trannie groomers in kindergarten, race riots,  and dumb focking wars. Oh, that's the Pro-Life side? Gimme a hat. Sorry about what I said earlier about creationism in schools. The Earth being 10000 years old is less worrysome than the boys can be girls stuff. The Alphabet people in schools is a bazillion times worse as are the CRT people. Yeah, yeah, I'll take the poster of Jesus killing a T-Rex with a bolt action rifle, too. Whatever it takes to keep those perverted creeps and race hustlers away from my kids.

This guy gets it.  

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

That's not a "tweet." It's a Newsweek piece on what Clownzo has been quoted as saying in regard to abortion.

I mistyped 'tweet 'for 'post'. As in your post. 

I'll go edit now. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, KSB2424 said:

I mistyped tweet for post. As in your post. 

I'll go edit now. 

And I fixored on my end. Carry on!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

question:  California has a travel ban on a whole bunch of states.  it is a complicated ban restricting employees and students from receiving funds to travel to and from other states.  So, lets say a California student is in Texas and suddenly needs an abortion.  Is California legally barred from providing funds to fly them to California for an abortion?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, JustinCharge said:

question:  California has a travel ban on a whole bunch of states.  it is a complicated ban restricting employees and students from receiving funds to travel to and from other states.  So, lets say a California student is in Texas and suddenly needs an abortion.  Is California legally barred from providing funds to fly them to California for an abortion?

You are getting way ahead of yourself.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

How about we point to the country you support by living there? Geebus what a focking hypocrite you are. Go jerk off to Mao photos.

Criticism from the scummiest poster in our the forum mens nothing.

While I involve myself to build things to develop community around here, everything you involve yourself with turns to sh*t. You are the Midas of turning things to sh*t.

We spent a couple weeks putting together a nice hair band draft and you came along and spread your sh*t everywhere by rigging the votes. That's right. you've been caught red-handed rigging our vote tally results, you vile human sh*tbag. The vote in our Hair Band poll were made open to public specifically to prevent dipsh*ts like you from tampering with the results. Everyone knows Soloist and Indy Colts Fan are your aliases. You admitted it yourself. Go delete your fake votes you frauduent POS or you'll be the first Fockhead I ever reported to Mike.

Take the L, do the right thing for the first time in your worthless life, and seriously FOCK OFF.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

Criticism from the scummiest poster in our the forum mens nothing.

While I involve myself to build things to develop community around here, everything you involve yourself with turns to sh*t. You are the Midas of turning things to sh*t.

We spent a couple weeks putting together a nice hair band draft and you came along and spread your sh*t everywhere by rigging the votes. That's right. you've been caught red-handed rigging our vote tally results, you vile human sh*tbag. The vote in our Hair Band poll were made open to public specifically to prevent dipsh*ts like you from tampering with the results. Everyone knows Soloist and Indy Colts Fan are your aliases. You admitted it yourself. Go delete your fake votes you frauduent POS or you'll be the first Fockhead I ever reported to Mike.

Take the L, do the right thing for the first time in your worthless life, and seriously FOCK OFF.

Bark bark, commie lap dog.

It's hilarious that you're getting all lathered up about a couple of extra votes in a poll you're winning by a landslide in a life-meaningless vote on best 1980s hair-band song picks and are now threatening to hit that report button, which pretty much everyone here almost unanimously despises. 

I'll go use a couple of aliases to nullify those votes if it soothes that burning bagina sensation that has angered and hardened that commie-loving heart of yours 

Peace out!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, Pimpadeaux said:

Bark bark, commie lap dog.

It's hilarious that you're getting all lathered up about a couple of extra votes in a poll you're winning by a landslide in a life-meaningless vote on best 1980s hair-band song picks and are now threatening to hit that report button, which pretty much everyone here almost unanimously despises. 

I'll go use a couple of aliases to nullify those votes if it soothes that burning bagina sensation that has angered and hardened that commie-loving heart of yours 

Peace out!

You used aliases to influence that draft?  Obviously you think your pathetic attempt at attention is the top priority.  It's quite sad, I feel sorry for you.  :( 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×