Leaderboard

I love how you think you're smarter or better than the uneducated minions that you stand with and parrot the same bullsh1t that you're all told. But to your credit you take it a step further. I've had many conversations with election deniers like yourself, and it always goes the same way, which is basically "show me your work" and that's where it ends since they can't. You've taken it a step further and now claim that it's impossible to show your work because the "system" won't allow it. So not only was the election rigged, but the ability to catch the rigging was also rigged. How convenient. It's a good tactic to protect yourself. If you are an engineer and possess an analytical mind, then your natural inclination is the CER method, claim evidence reasoning. You've made your claim but have no evidence so your reasoning is missing. Instead of adjusting your claim you're just saying it's impossible to get evidence lol. It's a convenient, lazy excuse. And it's not GIGO, something I understand having worked in software for 30 years. There is nothing inherently wrong with our election process, paper ballots or drop boxes. And it was never a problem until trump cried that he lost. Every recount, audit, study, analysis has shown zero evidence of fraud. Grown adults need to accept that.

On this point, I've been wanting to say, not necessarily to you specifically but in general, since I have some time now: I have some systems engineering experience, and there is a saying in that field: a system does what it's designed to do. It's kinda like software, which does exactly what you tell it to do... except that often, what you tell it to do (program it) is not what you intended. Hence bugs. It's not a perfect analogy, but my 2020 analogy was that the "system" was designed to enable a lot of fraud which was undetectable. Numerous states shotgunned paper ballots to registered voters in a manner they had never done before, nor vetted, nor tested. And states provided numerous unmonitored drop boxes to receive them. Whenever I hear about challenges about recounts being upheld, I want to club a baby seal or two. The question was never about counting ballots IMO, it was about garbage in, garbage out. Challenges to voting machines, counts, etc. were just diving catches. This is not to say that it absolutely happened, because as I just described, the system was not designed to answer that question. But as a systems engineer, when I hear people say "most secure election ever!", I laugh, because that's statistically impossible. And when the MSM comes up with a label like "election denier!," parroted by the Left to brow beat those who dare oppose the party line... well, I suspect their motivation.

This one is really simple, the Biden administration attempted to turn the US into a Banana Republic. The grown-ups had to step in and remedy the situation. Democrats only have themselves to blame and have proven time and time again that they simply can't be trusted with power. If you support the current day version of the Democrat party, you are absolutely part of the problem. You don't care about America or what it stands for. The sooner we realize this, the better.

I don't have a dog in the fight but this is a huge cop out. Additionally- you regularly prescribe intent to what people say here but you don't want to do it now. In the case of Trump and the election of 2020- how many things would need to happen before you at least entertain "Well maybe his intentions were bad here"? For example- here is a look at the call with Brad Raffensperger of Georgia in January of 2021 https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/fact-check-trumps-georgia-call-raffensperger According to this- Trump made 15 claims in trying to say they should relook at the voting- is 15 enough to say "Hey maybe this guy isn't on the up and up on this"?

Oh I will pass on that, I am reticent to ascribe intent to people.... particularly negative intent. That is how we end up with CNN paying Sandman, or CNN having to admit the "very fine people" hoax. In fact, it happens here rather consistently. Someone posts something, then someone strides in and makes some cartoonish comment in return, based on their assessment of intent, and is often wrong about that intent. I think it might come with age and experience, to be more inquisitive and less apt toward application of intent all the time. I think your hate for Trump is coloring your decision-making paradigm. Years in the military solved that flaw for me.

I’ll do this once because I’m not sure we’ve ever had this conversation before. Well actually, first off, this is an especially stupid topic to whatabout because it’s about a ruling that applies to all presidents. So when people are having adult conversations (difficult for you, I know) about the implications of such rulings, you really have to divorce it from any particular individual. So the concern is not Obama, specifically, just as it isn’t Trump, specifically. But turning to the general stupidity of your constant whatabout arguments, it proves absolutely nothing. Each situation is dealt with on its own merits. So if Obama should’ve been prosecuted, that’s one issue and you deal with it now or you try to make sure it doesn’t happen again. But what you don’t do, is never hold any president accountable ever again simply because, in your view, one wasn’t properly held accountable in the past. Obviously that’s focking stupid. It’s so obvious that you’re either just trolling or you’re truly so stupid that you cannot comprehend basic concepts. Since you’re MAGA it could well be the latter, but I’m guessing the former and thus I shouldn’t have wasted even this much time typing out what even a child could comprehend

Can I GET a halleLOOO-YAAH?????

They both were terrible. Biden was really terrible. This is easy, Maybe once you get tired of spamming every dipshit meme that crosses your timeline you can talk about being exhausting

Sure, I understand that people consistently apply intent and context to situations around Trump, and those are consistently proven wrong....so by all means, take his statements as you see fit. I think its fine. Not going to suggest you should only see things my way.

Tl/ dr. But thanks.

I think this can backfire in trump and re election. This could bring people to the polls to keep this crazy person out of office where he can do anything he wants.

Yeah I don’t think you get it. Makes sense, because you’re kinda dumb.

How many priests, bishops etc attend these events secretly. Probably quite a few. Nudity around kids right up their alley god bless, amen

The term whataboutism is only used by people who are afraid to confront their own hypocrisy. "It's absurd that we should discuss the behavior that my side is doing that we're accusing you of."

HAHAHAHAHAHA

The point is liberals such as yourself only care about holding anyone on the other side accountable, especially the fantasy version of Trump you have conjured up in your head. Obama clearly broke the law, and there was no call to hold him accountable.

A “patriot”

You have to click into it but the last sentence is clear as day as to what he is saying.

Maybe you didn't, maybe you did. What we do know for certain is that your father failed as a father.

Biden's decline is significant. He appears to be impaired. He does not appear to be capable of the job. It looks far worse than Trump's decline. I'm no expert, just my observation. Trump rarely broached the truth. At best, he stated opinions that may be truth. Everything he did was the greatest ever, etc. Now I know hyperbole isn't lying, per se, but it still ain't truth. And the lies were pretty GD egregious. Telling a national TV audience that Biden supports infanticide is not a defensible statement.

https://x.com/IlhanMN/status/1807834678847853055 The Supreme Court can no longer be trusted to uphold the Constitution. If Donald Trump is reelected, this convicted felon, rapist, and twice-impeached former President will be able to do whatever the hell he wants. It’s a scary day for American democracy.

I guess the concept of holding someone else to a higher standard than I hold myself is foreign to me.

That's not an answer. Do I think he'd actually do exactly that? No. It's just a simple example of things that have been hinted at. What he has been very clear about and he's not hiding is his plan to fire tens of thousands of federal employees and replace them with loyalists. Or consolidation of federal power under the executive branch, which includes DOJ, Treasury, Homeland Security, DOD, State, among others. Or about "being your retribution." Sure is hard to know when he's actually telling the truth.

the racism in this post is too funny

yay the whole city is a rainbow!!!!! celebrate my sexual preferences!!!! i like to jerk off and rub sh;t in my hair. yayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy!!!! give me a night at the ball park!!!