Roloff85 0 Posted October 15, 2015 Will he be the back to own in Dallas shortly? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tanatastic 2,062 Posted October 15, 2015 Nah but hes a decent stash and pray. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mcgruber 17 Posted October 15, 2015 starting him with confidence this week. I feel like he'll give me just as much production as TJ yeldon. Their RB coach had some nice things to say about him today. Probably wouldn't start him week 7, but if you have a roster spot you could do worse. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tanatastic 2,062 Posted October 15, 2015 starting him with confidence this week. I feel like he'll give me just as much production as TJ yeldon. Their RB coach had some nice things to say about him today. Probably wouldn't start him week 7, but if you have a roster spot you could do worse. So a guy who has gotten 2 carries at most and took some 1st team reps in practice will get you as much as a full time 3 down RB? Also hes on bye so id make other plans. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Roloff85 0 Posted October 15, 2015 Well Dallas is on a bye this week so feel free to start him. I meant in the near future Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mcgruber 17 Posted October 15, 2015 obviously I was kidding guys. I only said that because Yeldon hasn't practiced for 2 days in a row. hence the second part of my post of actual advice on how i feel. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BobSanders_33 127 Posted October 15, 2015 Will he be the back to own in Dallas soon? He is the back to own in Dallas right. Prepare for the unleashing next week! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ray_T 753 Posted October 15, 2015 I dont know that I'd start him this week, but like mentioned earlier, he is a good stash and pray. The RB situation improved for CMike due to injuries and weaker than expected performance by those ahead of him on the depth chart. Dallas is getting to be a desperate team. With a new QB in place(Cassel) now would be the ideal time to bring in a new RB. CMike has had enough time to digest the playbook, so I think he is a legit threat to start. I just wouldnt bet on it unless I had no other choice. I'd say the odds are about 60-40 that they turn to him in the next 3 weeks. But the odds of it happening this week are not as good (maybe closer to 40 or 50%) I'd say don't start him this week unless you have no other options. But be aware that he could be on the radar for next week or the week after. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cruzer 1,995 Posted October 15, 2015 Local beat writer here (Fisher) was on today. Based on what's he's seen and from the shake ups going on at Valley Ranch - he said today he believes Michael will be the main back in 2 weeks against the Giants.... So grain, salt. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
stonewall 647 Posted October 15, 2015 Just dropped Randle for him in 2 leagues......short benches. They obviously are not sold on Randle, and there is still huge upside behind that line for a RB that can step up and ball. Gotta roll the dice sometimes and pray for snake-eyes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
R8RMick 242 Posted October 15, 2015 Dallas can right that ship in a hurry with a big win using Michael running the football in NY. The situational environment on the field certainly can't get much worse lol... 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
R8RMick 242 Posted October 15, 2015 Local beat writer here (Fisher) was on today. Based on what's he's seen and from the shake ups going on at Valley Ranch - he said today he believes Michael will be the main back in 2 weeks against the Giants.... So grain, salt. Fish is usually pretty dialed in isn't he? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sirensong 111 Posted October 15, 2015 Fish is usually pretty dialed in isn't he? yes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TennisMenace 156 Posted October 15, 2015 I think Dallas is souring on Randle and with Dunbar out, Michael may get his shot to prove he should be the man. I picked him up hoping this to be but I still believe Randle will have one more chance or at least be looming around. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
weepaws 3,191 Posted October 15, 2015 Will he be the back to own in Dallas shortly? Unless Randle and McFadden gets hurt no . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Texas10 15 Posted October 15, 2015 Might drop Tevin Coleman for him, I need to take a chance on somebody... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
uwmalcolm 74 Posted October 16, 2015 Just dropped Randle for him in 2 leagues......short benches. They obviously are not sold on Randle, and there is still huge upside behind that line for a RB that can step up and ball. Gotta roll the dice sometimes and pray for snake-eyes. Are you serious? If so, you have some balls buddy! I admire your faith and wish you well on your mission. Who are your other RBs on those squads? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
weepaws 3,191 Posted October 16, 2015 I agree why not drop Randle for him I like the move . Now that's swinging for the fences . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted October 16, 2015 I don't know much about Michael. Does he have good hands? Or would he be a first and second down back? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr Neil 63 Posted October 16, 2015 I think McFadden emerges out of all this the victor. Pete Carroll is a great evaluator of talent. He would have never let him walk for peanuts if he thought he could play on Sundays. Oodles of talent but I don't think he can grasp blitz pickups, audibles etc. once the Cowboys figure that out he will get pulled. McFadden is pass catching back now regardless but that could push him over the edge to actual handle early duties 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cruzer 1,995 Posted October 16, 2015 I don't know much about Michael. Does he have good hands? Or would he be a first and second down back? For all the crap talking this clown did post-Murray, he's done jack shiat with his opportunity. Word is the powers that be are fed up with him on two fronts. 1) the stunt he pulled sticking the ball over the goal line in the Saints game (that he later basically told the coaches F'you) and 2) he's missing holes and running lanes bcoz he's too busy dancing around........ Michael is a back who is supposed to be a straight, A to B type runner that Red and Linehan are wanting. We will see. Like I said - I've wanted Randle cut and gone since before the season started - this guy is a first class, worthless dumbass. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 441 Posted October 16, 2015 I think Mike is a potential great talent who hasn't been a great student of the game in a bad situation, ie first Seattle behind Lynch and Turbin and now Dallas as a 4th RB who missed their offseason and now missing Romo & Bryant. And the end if season schedule stinks. But he looks the part of a premium RB. I dropped him in frustration then saw that Dallas was looking to get him in a carry share with Randle and now I've spent a good bit of FAAB budget to get him back. I think the value here is when Romo and Bryant, and maybe just Bryant, get back. But any time RB takes over you have to try to get him unless you're stacked. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted October 16, 2015 I snagged him in both leagues but not with any more expectation than a lottery ticket or maybe a spot start or two later. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kent 228 Posted October 16, 2015 Might drop Tevin Coleman for him, I need to take a chance on somebody... Don't do that. There is a huge RBBC issue lingering in Dallas no matter what. Atlanta rolls bell cow style and its line is playing like the 91 Hogs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Texas10 15 Posted October 16, 2015 Don't do that. There is a huge RBBC issue lingering in Dallas no matter what. Atlanta rolls bell cow style and its line is playing like the 91 Hogs. Karlos Williams then? I have to drop a RB in order to grab Michael, McCoy and West(I lost JC) are my other two. So basically I'm holding 2 valuable handcuffs, question is which is more valuable, Karlos or Tevin? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jrokh 608 Posted October 16, 2015 If he starts he's a top 20 play easily, not that complicated Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
R8RMick 242 Posted October 16, 2015 Don't do that. There is a huge RBBC issue lingering in Dallas no matter what. Atlanta rolls bell cow style and its line is playing like the 91 Hogs. They are getting after it, and I LOVE the way they're using the fullback as a lead blocker. DiMarco flat out BLEW up the edge rusher on the play Coleman busted and then fumbled on. Just blew him up. Speaking of which, didn't see Tevin back in the game after that lol... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
R8RMick 242 Posted October 16, 2015 I think McFadden emerges out of all this the victor. Pete Carroll is a great evaluator of talent. He would have never let him walk for peanuts if he thought he could play on Sundays. Oodles of talent but I don't think he can grasp blitz pickups, audibles etc. once the Cowboys figure that out he will get pulled. McFadden is pass catching back now regardless but that could push him over the edge to actual handle early duties Actually the 'great evaluator of talent' in Seattle was probably Scot McCloughan, who at least had a hand in the drafting of players like Russell Wilson and Richard Sherman. It's a big reason I picked up Matt Jones in my keeper league. But I digress. My take is that Michael just wasn't a fit for how Seattle operated its run game. This from an article I shamelessly poached from the Seattle Times- Seattle running backs are asked to hit “dark creases” — designated spots in the line where a hole might not exist one second before opening the next. Lynch does that better than anyone, and fullback Derrick Coleman once said the backs who don’t do that aren’t here anymore. Of course the article also spoke of 'failures to grasp the intricacies of the position' etc. And Michael didn't help himself with some pre-season fumbles and knuckleheaded behavior. He once ripped off a seven yard gain then tried to wave off Lynch who was returning to the field lol... Now that takes balls. The bottom line though is the guy simply hasn't seen the field in any worthwhile action. Until he gets into a real game and is given significant carries all of this is pure conjecture. My contention is that he's a good fit for what Dallas did last season, when they experienced top level success. Right now this team is wandering the desert, looking for a glass of water on offense. If, IF, Michael can come in and tote the rock 20-25 times a game and give them a semblance of a ball control game, then the team can stay above water until it gets the big guns back. I actually like where Dallas is right now, assuming of course the injured players get right. That defense is really getting after it, but has been on the field too long during games. If they can find a running game, a consistent ball control running game, that ship can get righted real quick. I think there's a better than average chance Michael can do it. And one more thing... Michael is under contract very cheaply through next season, which is a HUGE factor in Dallas. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frozenbeernuts 2,264 Posted October 16, 2015 They are getting after it, and I LOVE the way they're using the fullback as a lead blocker. DiMarco flat out BLEW up the edge rusher on the play Coleman busted and then fumbled on. Just blew him up. Speaking of which, didn't see Tevin back in the game after that lol... He got a carry in the red zone the next drive i believe. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frozenbeernuts 2,264 Posted October 16, 2015 Actually the 'great evaluator of talent' in Seattle was probably Scot McCloughan, who at least had a hand in the drafting of players like Russell Wilson and Richard Sherman. It's a big reason I picked up Matt Jones in my keeper league. But I digress. My take is that Michael just wasn't a fit for how Seattle operated its run game. This from an article I shamelessly poached from the Seattle Times- Seattle running backs are asked to hit dark creases designated spots in the line where a hole might not exist one second before opening the next. Lynch does that better than anyone, and fullback Derrick Coleman once said the backs who dont do that arent here anymore. Of course the article also spoke of 'failures to grasp the intricacies of the position' etc. And Michael didn't help himself with some pre-season fumbles and knuckleheaded behavior. He once ripped off a seven yard gain then tried to wave off Lynch who was returning to the field lol... Now that takes balls. The bottom line though is the guy simply hasn't seen the field in any worthwhile action. Until he gets into a real game and is given significant carries all of this is pure conjecture. My contention is that he's a good fit for what Dallas did last season, when they experienced top level success. Right now this team is wandering the desert, looking for a glass of water on offense. If, IF, Michael can come in and tote the rock 20-25 times a game and give them a semblance of a ball control game, then the team can stay above water until it gets the big guns back. I actually like where Dallas is right now, assuming of course the injured players get right. That defense is really getting after it, but has been on the field too long during games. If they can find a running game, a consistent ball control running game, that ship can get righted real quick. I think there's a better than average chance Michael can do it. And one more thing... Michael is under contract very cheaply through next season, which is a HUGE factor in Dallas. Dallas has proven to be fiscally responsible this year so it does seem important to gain value. Unless Michael is just an absolute train wreck behind the scenes, i dont see why they wouldnt try him out. Randle is not putting this team on his shoulders. Cmike can from a talent stand point at least. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 441 Posted October 16, 2015 If he starts he's a top 20 play easily, not that complicated Really? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
weepaws 3,191 Posted October 16, 2015 I don't think he is a top 20 play just because he starts , Randle will still get a lot of the work and McFadden is no question the third down rb . I think he is a reach is all . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sirensong 111 Posted October 16, 2015 Word is the powers that be are fed up with him on two fronts. 1) the stunt he pulled sticking the ball over the goal line in the Saints game (that he later basically told the coaches F'you) and 2) he's missing holes and running lanes bcoz he's too busy dancing around. good summary of randle. i was wrong on him--i figured he'd see what was working for murray, and try to evolve his game. instead, he got the starting spot and regressed. he's freelancing everywhere, and that 'six points' comment really ended any remaining support i had for him. would have been very happy to see him cut the next day. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
R8RMick 242 Posted October 16, 2015 One thing is for sure, it's been an absolute crazy year at Valley Ranch. Was never big on the underwear guy, but I was way off base on how Murray would do in Philly as well. The injuries have been surreal actually. Having said that, I still like the position they're in and what they have to work with. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
joeH 6 Posted October 16, 2015 What I'm having fun watching is that one owner in my league picked up Randle, McFadden, and Dunbar in order to completely cover the Cowboys backfield. I picked up CMike a few weeks ago. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 6,586 Posted October 16, 2015 Was offered 4 awful trades for Michael this week Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BTL99 34 Posted October 17, 2015 His name is Christine though. Ewwww. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
weepaws 3,191 Posted October 17, 2015 This guy is over hyped right now . I see bust . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
R8RMick 242 Posted October 17, 2015 This guy is over hyped right now . I see bust . And that's fine. I get it and respect the opinion. I'd just like to see the kid given a legitimate chance. Maybe two games with 15-20 carries. We'll find out soon enough. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Skinny_Bastard 157 Posted October 17, 2015 No team is going to give up a star talent at any position in the NFL. Seattle has a great player personnel scouting team and for them to let Michael walk for a 7th rounder speaks volume. He's overhyped and its simply dumb to assume Dallas will give him 20 carries if he's averaging the same as randle and McFadden. What has the dude done in his NFL career to warrant a 20 carry game right off the bat? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
