RaiderHaters Revenge 4,535 Posted October 9, 2016 Yes. But so is his opponent. preach brotha Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
titans&bucs&bearsohmy! 2,745 Posted October 9, 2016 Yes. But so is his opponent.Not even comparable in level. She is a shitty politician. He is a clown. A carnie barker. A sideshow. A lightweight. It's comparing a rotten apple to the turd left after eating the rotten apple. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted October 9, 2016 Well it seems you all aren't very good judges of character because it has been clear to everyone else (those who doesn't support Donald Trump) that he has been offensive and unfit for office since day 1.Republican hacks are a bit slow. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted October 9, 2016 Not even comparable in level. She is a shitty politician. He is a clown. A carnie barker. A sideshow. A lightweight. It's comparing a rotten apple to the turd left after eating the rotten apple. Morally and ethically they are pretty much equal. His problem is he adds in being utterly clueless and boastfully naive on every actual issue. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
peenie 1,953 Posted October 9, 2016 Not voting for either, but if I was voting for Trump, this new revelation wouldn't stop me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,911 Posted October 9, 2016 Not even comparable in level. She is a shitty politician. He is a clown. A carnie barker. A sideshow. A lightweight. It's comparing a rotten apple to the turd left after eating the rotten apple. Come on man. Do you think the whole e-mail thing was some sort of innocent mistake? That was some serious shite. Just because the current administration that has a vested interest in her getting elected covered for her doesn't mean squat. And does anyone really think she did a good job as SOS?? She kinda screwed up everything she went near. Russian re-set, Libya, Isis forming and flourishing under her nose. Just because Trump is the one pointing her failures out doesn't make them untrue. Neither one of these two should be President. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,911 Posted October 9, 2016 Morally and ethically they are pretty much equal. His problem is he adds in being utterly clueless and boastfully naive on every actual issue. Nothing is as clueless as wanting to bring thousands of refugees here. Nothing. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cruzer 1,996 Posted October 9, 2016 Nothing is as clueless as wanting to bring thousands of refugees here. Nothing. I'd say WMDs, a few trillion $$$ and thousands of lost soldiers qualifies. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,063 Posted October 9, 2016 I'm confused, you guys are turning on him now? You didn't know he said inappropriate things before? So...calling Mexicans rapists and murderers wasn't offensive?? He called Rosie O'Donell fat and ugly. He discriminated against blacks, he refused to rent to them. I'm confused, what did he say today that was any less offensive than what he said yesterday? None of them were white people (except Rosie o'donnell). Hate to say it but I think that's where he crossed the line for many right-of-center folks Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,063 Posted October 9, 2016 I wonder why the MSM didn't whip out this video back during the primaries? Oh that's right I forgot, they wanted him to win so that they could publish it a month before the election to destroy him. The MSM disgusts me. And you lib lemmings who are all "OMFG Donald Trump said THAT 10 years ago$#@!" like it's shocking are pathetic as well. Wow. Poor Jerry, you just can't help but look like an idiot sometimes. I get it though, you're upset. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
peenie 1,953 Posted October 9, 2016 None of them were white people (except Rosie o'donnell). Hate to say it but I think that's where he crossed the line for many right-of-center folks Can't argue with that. White women are America's most precious gem. He clearly crossed the line, lol. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted October 9, 2016 I'd say WMDs, a few trillion $$$ and thousands of lost soldiers qualifies. Armig the Saudis with Nukes and being Putins does too. Not understanding thatbhis economic plans would be awful for us...the list goes on and on with Trump. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 7,069 Posted October 9, 2016 Wow. Poor Jerry, you just can't help but look like an idiot sometimes. I get it though, you're upset. On my dumbest day, were I drunk, sick with the flu... I'm still smarter than you've ever thought of being. Process that as you think about how you are parroting the soft-minded mantra of "how dare you question the media?$#@!" you've allowed yourself to follow. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
titans&bucs&bearsohmy! 2,745 Posted October 9, 2016 Come on man. Do you think the whole e-mail thing was some sort of innocent mistake? That was some serious shite. Just because the current administration that has a vested interest in her getting elected covered for her doesn't mean squat. And does anyone really think she did a good job as SOS?? She kinda screwed up everything she went near. Russian re-set, Libya, Isis forming and flourishing under her nose. Just because Trump is the one pointing her failures out doesn't make them untrue. Neither one of these two should be President. I will agree that neither should be president. I will agree that her ethics suck. And if the other party had nominated someone remotely competent or electable, I would vote for them. They did not. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,911 Posted October 9, 2016 I'd say WMDs, a few trillion $$$ and thousands of lost soldiers qualifies. Ok, buts that's in the past, can't change it. As far as going forward, bringing in thousands of refugees that we know nothing about is doomed to fail. Check out Europe. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,911 Posted October 9, 2016 Can't argue with that. White women are America's most precious gem. He clearly crossed the line, lol. I'll argue with that. There are illegal aliens coming here and committing crimes. That's a fact Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,911 Posted October 9, 2016 None of them were white people (except Rosie o'donnell). Hate to say it but I think that's where he crossed the line for many right-of-center folks I guess those weren't white guys in the republican primary that he attacked. And last I checked he started out his campaign going after Megyn Kelly, who's as white as you can get. You have failed once more, and I'm glad to have pointed it out. Dumbass Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,063 Posted October 9, 2016 On my dumbest day, were I drunk, sick with the flu... I'm still smarter than you've ever thought of being. Process that as you think about how you are parroting the soft-minded mantra of "how dare you question the media?$#@!" you've allowed yourself to follow. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BLS 314 Posted October 9, 2016 On my dumbest day, were I drunk, sick with the flu... I'm still smarter than you've ever thought of being. Process that as you think about how you are parroting the soft-minded mantra of "how dare you question the media?$#@!" you've allowed yourself to follow. I don't think Trump would have made any significant changes anyway Jerry. The whole thing is broken and corrupt; even as you suggested, right down the propaganda machine. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,415 Posted October 9, 2016 http://money.cnn.com/2016/10/07/media/access-hollywood-donald-trump-tape/index.html Phew. Thank goodness somebody remembered this tape now. Look Mike, I seem to be living RMFF in your head with this logical to a fault stuff, and I think the problem is that you and I have a fundamentally different definition of logical. To me for instance, if somebody deletes 10s of thousands of emails, it is logical that they are trying to hide something. But inexplicably, you somehow view that as "but there is no EVIDENCE that there is bad stuff in those emails$#@!" When, umm, of course duh, they were deleted. I don't know what to tell you, so let's leave it at this: let's see what other inflammatory Trump videos emerge in the next 4 weeks that media outlets suddenly remembered. Media outlets, it was ONE outlet Jerry and barely that(celebrity gossip show), and then it was leaked to the post while they were preparing the story. You're lack of knowledge on how broadcasting, media, news rooms work is impressive...almost as impressive as your imagination when you decide to fill in the ALL the holes in your knowledge with a shadowy conspiracy to make sense of it all...very logical. And yes we have a BIG difference in how logic works, one of uses facts and evidence to come to a conclusion, while one of us believes in the Illuminati. See if you can logically deduce which is which. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,063 Posted October 9, 2016 Media outlets, it was ONE outlet Jerry, and then it was leaked to the post while they were preparing the story. You're lack of knowledge on how broadcasting, media, news rooms work is impressive...almost as impressive as your imagination when you decide to fill in the ALL the holes in your knowledge with a shadowy conspiracy to make sense of it all...very logical. And yes we have a BIG difference in how logic works, one of uses facts and evidence to come to a conclusion, while one of us believes in the Illuminati. See if you can logically deduce which is which. Let's assume Jerry is right (a stretch). Maybe don't nominate a focking carnival barker?? Of course that was going to go badly. Nominate someone that can't be easily sunk by a supposed media conspiracy because he's the most loathsome person to ever seek the office. It'd be like complaining there was some media conspiracy to paint Hillary Clinton as untrustworthy. Well don't focking nominate a secretive, untrustworthy person Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 7,069 Posted October 9, 2016 Dang, give me some warning if you are going to throw the gun, that shiot hurt when it hit my shin. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IGotWorms 4,063 Posted October 9, 2016 Dang, give me some warning if you are going to throw the gun, that shiot hurt when it hit my shin. Take a step away from the computer Jerry. Take a few deep breaths, go for a walk, maybe sleep on it. Tomorrow you will see how foolish you look Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 6,003 Posted October 9, 2016 Take a step away from the computer Jerry. Take a few deep breaths, go for a walk, maybe sleep on it. Tomorrow you will see how foolish you look You're voting for HItlery, right? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 7,069 Posted October 9, 2016 Take a step away from the computer Jerry. Take a few deep breaths, go for a walk, maybe sleep on it. Tomorrow you will see how foolish you look I know you lack the ability to do this, but you might want to go back in this thread and see which of us started challenging the intelligence of the other. And when I called you on it, I got a Highly intelligent of you, I suppose I should acquiesce and take that walk you suggested. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chronic Husker 86 Posted October 9, 2016 The focking plane has crashed into the mountain. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Djgb13 2,339 Posted October 9, 2016 33,000 deleted emails containing classified info are impossible to find but somehow they manage to find an audio recording of two men talking about vaginas from 2005. Oh the irony 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 7,069 Posted October 9, 2016 Media outlets, it was ONE outlet Jerry and barely that(celebrity gossip show), and then it was leaked to the post while they were preparing the story. You're lack of knowledge on how broadcasting, media, news rooms work is impressive...almost as impressive as your imagination when you decide to fill in the ALL the holes in your knowledge with a shadowy conspiracy to make sense of it all...very logical. And yes we have a BIG difference in how logic works, one of uses facts and evidence to come to a conclusion, while one of us believes in the Illuminati. See if you can logically deduce which is which. Help me to understand "leaked to the post while they were preparing the story" and how that is inconsistent with my premise. Also please educate me on how broadcasting, media, news rooms work, as my ignorance is apparently impressive. I can logically deduce that you are pretty high up on the autism scale, since you ignore my comments about the emails being deleted. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Drizzay 744 Posted October 9, 2016 I don't think i'm voting for either of them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted October 9, 2016 I wonder why the MSM didn't whip out this video back during the primaries? Oh that's right I forgot, they wanted him to win so that they could publish it a month before the election to destroy him. The MSM disgusts me. And you lib lemmings who are all "OMFG Donald Trump said THAT 10 years ago$#@!" like it's shocking are pathetic as well. well said Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KSB2424 3,173 Posted October 9, 2016 Early on, I liked what Trump was saying. I paid more attention to him and decided he wasn't Presidential, he wasn't a statesman, he was too Kardashian to be POTUS. Over the course of the next few months, the evidence to support my initial feeling became overwhelming. And now, the late-election bombshells come out making him appear far worse than my initial feelings believed. This guy is not a POTUS. He is not fit to hold any elected office. Raw, illogical, partisanship is the only way you could vote for this guy. He is not defendable. The fact you were, of all people, were snowed, says it all. Nobody likes an "I told you so". But yeah. We all had this conversation in the primary. Enjoy a Hillary Presidancy. Y'all reap what you sow. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 5,478 Posted October 9, 2016 If a member of the MSM had it during the primaries they would have jumped to publish it first before their juicy scoop got picked up by somebody else. Somebody that wanted Trump to lose and wasn't another retarded member of the Bush family knew about it and sat on it waiting for the right time. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Big Guy 1,421 Posted October 9, 2016 Well it seems you all aren't very good judges of character because it has been clear to everyone else (those who doesn't support Donald Trump) that he has been offensive and unfit for office since day 1. His off color remarks in no way compare to Hillary's long list of crimes. speck meet plank Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Djgb13 2,339 Posted October 9, 2016 I'll say this. I do NOT like Trump. But I HATE Hillary. Either way this country is focked. I just think we would be better off with Trump than Hillary. Why? Because it's way too obvious who most of the politicians and media want in office which is Hillary. Too often have people tried to downplay Hillarys mistakes and focked up agenda while trying to blast stuff Trump has done all over the news waves. Sorry but when the bias is that obvious I tend to want to vote the other way. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 5,478 Posted October 9, 2016 I'll say this. I do NOT like Trump. But I HATE Hillary. Either way this country is focked. I just think we would be better off with Trump than Hillary. Why? Because it's way too obvious who most of the politicians and media want in office which is Hillary. Too often have people tried to downplay Hillarys mistakes and focked up agenda while trying to blast stuff Trump has done all over the news waves. Sorry but when the bias is that obvious I tend to want to vote the other way. A good point. Deciding whose head would be most entertaining to see exploding may be better than a coin flip. It may not matter though since it would seem that Trump is now doomed regardless. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TD Ryan2 316 Posted October 9, 2016 I'd say WMDs, a few trillion $$$ and thousands of lost soldiers qualifies.And this is the problem...EVERY partisan, hack, on both sides, has "cried wolf" too many times... Impeach Clinton! Impeach Bush! Impeach Obama! all this crap is typical, standard "scandal" in politics The Trump stuff is self-inflicted... it isn't spun or crafted... it's what he says in debates, how he says it, and how he's been all along. Not a person electable as POTUS any more than Ozzy Osborne should be guarding the Tomb of the Unknown soldier. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,911 Posted October 9, 2016 Take a step away from the computer Jerry. Take a few deep breaths, go for a walk, maybe sleep on it. Tomorrow you will see how foolish you look Nobody likes you. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frank M 181 Posted October 9, 2016 The fact you were, of all people, were snowed, says it all. Nobody likes an "I told you so". But yeah. We all had this conversation in the primary. Enjoy a Hillary Presidancy. Y'all reap what you sow. If you say y'all one more time, I might have to punch you in the face in front of your wife and kids. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
crackattack 520 Posted October 9, 2016 It's hard to take any of this serious. Liberals did all they could to dismiss Clinton's womanizing behavior when he was in office. He lies under oath, was a misogynistic, aggressive womanizer. Yet he's out campaigning for a presidential candidate. He's also beloved and one of the most popular Democrats in the history of the party. Al Gore has his accusers too, yet he's campaigning also. Now, I know these people aren't running for president, but shouldn't they be shunned? Shamed? Hidden away? After all, they're accused/proven of the same and sometimes worse behavior. Seems hypocritical to me. It's like the religious right trying to make laws based off religion or the moral high ground, then get caught in a gay scandal or cheating on their spouse. It's all what side of the party line you fall on, but it's all hypocritical. I honestly can't wait till this shitt show is over. Clinton is going to win and the Republicans have nobody to blame but themselves. Enjoy your Sunday and Football 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted October 9, 2016 It's hard to take any of this serious. Liberals did all they could to dismiss Clinton's womanizing behavior when he was in office. He lies under oath, was a misogynistic, aggressive womanizer. Yet he's out campaigning for a presidential candidate. He's also beloved and one of the most popular Democrats in the history of the party. Al Gore has his accusers too, yet he's campaigning also. Now, I know these people aren't running for president, but shouldn't they be shunned? Shamed? Hidden away? After all, they're accused/proven of the same and sometimes worse behavior. Seems hypocritical to me. It's like the religious right trying to make laws based off religion or the moral high ground, then get caught in a gay scandal or cheating on their spouse. It's all what side of the party line you fall on, but it's all hypocritical. I honestly can't wait till this shitt show is over. Clinton is going to win and the Republicans have nobody to blame but themselves. Enjoy your Sunday and Football And you have the opposite too (which you hint at with the last little bit)..thise that called for Clinton's head now forced to try and defend Trump. Just a huge train wreck. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites