Why is gay and tranny "okay" to the libs, but not beastiality, incest or pedophilia ?

[tubby_mcgee 700]

So libs, you're okay with male on male, female on female marriages, sex, etc...but you're not okay with mom on son, dad/son, dad/daughter, sister/brother, man/animal, 3-some marriages, etc?

 

Just to clarify, I think its ALL fvcked up.

Now back to the libs....why are you not open to all of it? Is it because your messiah hasn't said it, or personally that's where you draw the line? LOL. So...a man shoving his c0ck up another man's rear and and ramrodding his poo in a whipped creamy mess is good with you, but a mom and son or sister and brother is off limits? I can't tell what's more fvcked up.

 

a.) that you're okay with the first set of wrong doing

or

b.) you're not okay with the second set.


And .....50 years ago....libs and conservatives thought it was all wrong.

At some point, the libs added gays to the "okay" list.
Then transgenders.

Give it time, and the democratic be okay with molesting, incest and beastiality. Give it time.

[Drizzay 709]

3-some marriage

 

Some fundies are ok with this.

[Strike 5,345]

Good thread. I'm sure it will go well for you!

[NorthernVike 2,083]

Who says they don't think it's ok?

[Patriotsfatboy1 1,432]

I just proposed to a porpoise.

 

[Herbivore 1,120]

You are hilarious...and sad.

 

I think two consenting adults should be able to do what they want. Animals and children are not consenting adults. Incest..as long as you are not making babies..enjoy yourself. I don't care remotely about 3 some marriages.

[NorthernVike 2,083]

I just proposed to a porpoise.

 

Fock dude. I just read that as porlosie.

[RLLD 4,180]

Let me help you, its not about logic, rationality, philosophical integrity....its about what they think, feel, and believe in the moment...and their position will sway with what ever immediate feeling they have.

 

It's scary stuff.

[KSB2424 3,148]

Consent.

 

Children and animals dont have the capacity

[joneo 556]

 

 

Incest..as long as you are not making babies..enjoy yourself.

 

And there you have it. Just pathetic

[Herbivore 1,120]

Let me help you, its not about logic, rationality, philosophical integrity....its about what they think, feel, and believe in the moment...and their position will sway with what ever immediate feeling they have.

 

It's scary stuff.

 

you realize the they are actually different people...right? and the bolded part...honestly...STFU

[NorthernVike 2,083]

Consent.

 

Children and animals dont have the capacity

Who says children don't have consent? Smell giantsfan's fingers.

[MDC 7,229]

Let me help you, its not about logic, rationality, philosophical integrity....its about what they think, feel, and believe in the moment...and their position will sway with what ever immediate feeling they have.

 

It's scary stuff.

Consenting adults vs kids / animals seems like a pretty logical rational difference.

[fandandy 3,313]

Consent.

 

Children and animals dont have the capacity

What about the dog that humps your leg? He's obviously asking for it.

[Filthy Fernadez 2,696]

Who says they don't think it's ok?

 

Exactly.

 

Podesta brothers are into some creepy focking sh!t. Madonna has most likely tried some animals.

[cbfalcon 825]

I'd like to commend Tubby for at least not using the N-word or even being at all racist in his op.

[Patriotsfatboy1 1,432]

Fock dude. I just read that as porlosie.

 

Ok. I have to ask. What is a porlosie?

[NorthernVike 2,083]

I'd like to commend Tubby for at least not using the N-word or even being at all racist in his op.

 

You must have missed the last line

 

 

So libs, you're okay with male on male, female on female marriages, sex, etc...but you're not okay with mom on son, dad/son, dad/daughter, sister/brother, man/animal, 3-some marriages, etc?

 

Just to clarify, I think its ALL fvcked up.

Now back to the libs....why are you not open to all of it? Is it because your messiah hasn't said it, or personally that's where you draw the line? LOL. So...a man shoving his c0ck up another man's rear and and ramrodding his poo in a whipped creamy mess is good with you, but a mom and son or sister and brother is off limits? I can't tell what's more fvcked up.

 

a.) that you're okay with the first set of wrong doing

or

b.) you're not okay with the second set.

 

 

And .....50 years ago....libs and conservatives thought it was all wrong.

 

At some point, the libs added gays to the "okay" list.

Then transgenders.

 

Give it time, and the democratic be okay with molesting, incest and beastiality. Give it time.

 

Focking black basturds.

[Cdub100 3,874]

Who says they aren't? They have been trying to normalize pedophilia for a few years now

[NorthernVike 2,083]

 

Ok. I have to ask. What is a porlosie?

 

 

A play on werds " Pelosi "

 

 

 

But I spelled it wrong.

[RLLD 4,180]

Consenting adults vs kids / animals seems like a pretty logical rational difference.

 

 

Unless the situation provides a vehicle for political capital, then i would have no doubt that the leftists position on these would be entirely malleable.

[Herbivore 1,120]

I'd like to commend Tubby for at least not using the N-word or even being at all racist in his op.

 

 

tubby - Is it ok to for a man to ram his cack up a women's rear ramrodding her poo into a whipped creamy mess?

[NorthernVike 2,083]

 

 

tubby - Is it ok to for a man to ram his cack up a women's rear ramrodding her poo into a whipped creamy mess?

Don't care what he says but I says HELL YES.

[sderk 1,040]

 

you realize the they are actually different people...right? and the bolded part...honestly...STFU

Coming from a self proclaimed "herbivore". So the question is, are you a goat, a monkey, or a sheep?

 

Or simply just a useless, left on someone's doorstep, frame of mind.

[Patriotsfatboy1 1,432]

 

 

tubby - Is it ok to for a man to ram his cack up a women's rear ramrodding her poo into a whipped creamy mess?

 

God, I hope so.

[sderk 1,040]

 

 

tubby - Is it ok to for a man to ram his cack up a women's rear ramrodding her poo into a whipped creamy mess?

Wow. Here is some intelligent thought coming from someone who likes his smily emojis when talking about "ramrodding poo".

 

You go girl.

[Patriotsfatboy1 1,432]

 

 

A play on werds " Pelosi "

 

 

 

But I spelled it wrong.

 

Oh, I was worried that I was somehow not up on some common term. I do pride myself in still being hip to the lingo of the youngins'.

[bostonlager 2,664]

Dogs and children can't vote. You can bet your ass if they could there would be a march or parade dedicated to focking dogs and children sponsored by the left.

[wiffleball 4,789]

Will Gee, there's an original thought.

 

Let's see what's next?

 

Ohyeah, then the gays say "why they have to go from two consenting adults to animals? " What kind of freaks are these people?

 

if you really want to make a valid point, homosexuality is banned in the Bible because of what is written in Leviticus. Of course, jump down one paragraph and Leviticus also calls eating shellfish an abomination.

 

So the real issue is, why do Christians protest sucking but not shrimp cawktail?

[NorthernVike 2,083]

 

Oh, I was worried that I was somehow not up on some common term. I do pride myself in still being hip to the lingo of the youngins'.

Not often I'm call a youngin. I'll take it. (soon to be 51 )

[NorthernVike 2,083]

Dogs and children can't vote. You can bet your ass if they could there would be a march or parade dedicated to focking dogs and children sponsored by the left.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,153]

I didn't know Christians were still following the Old Testament. I think they got a new one.

[wiffleball 4,789]

I didn't know Christians were still following the Old Testament. I think they got a new one.

This is a relatively new trope by those running from the OT.

 

So let me see if I got this right, I always have a ball with this;

 

God, who can see as far into the future as the East is from the West. God, whose word per the Bible is permanent is eternal and omniscient. God, who is all of these things, had to rewrite his service contract halfway through the term due to changing market conditions?

[TBayXXXVII 2,505]

As soon as there's a group of "victims" claiming something, that's when the Democrats will start supporting them. Sadly, I fear that if they don't pick up the cause, the Republicans might in order to use it against them.

[Frozenbeernuts 2,217]

Incest should remain illegal and be punished pretty harshly.

 

Consenting adult human on human relationships, why would I give a fock? Why would you waste your time giving a fock? Another republican trying to tell people how to live their lives, and showing their weird closet/homophobic mentality

[TBayXXXVII 2,505]

Incest should remain illegal and be punished pretty harshly.

 

Consenting adult human on human relationships, why would I give a fock? Why would you waste your time giving a fock? Another republican trying to tell people how to live their lives, and showing their weird closet/homophobic mentality

 

You're first 2 sentences not mutually exclusive. A 40 year old mother can have a 20 year old son, and hence be two consenting adult humans.

 

That said, incest is bad. It could result in reproduction. A result that affects everyone, not just the parents. When your actions create a negative impact on the public, the public has a right to restrict those actions.

[fandandy 3,313]

Dogs and children can't vote. You can bet your ass if they could there would be a march or parade dedicated to focking dogs and children sponsored by the left.

Holding up signs. HANDS OFF MY KENNEL

[sderk 1,040]

As soon as there's a group of "victims" claiming something, that's when the Democrats will start supporting them. Sadly, I fear that if they don't pick up the cause, the Republicans might in order to use it against them.

If only the fetuses could form a group and complain about being murdered. But somehow I still don't think the left would give a shlt. They want their needy to-be mamas to depend upon the government for "help".

[Hardcore troubadour 15,153]

This is a relatively new trope by those running from the OT.

 

So let me see if I got this right, I always have a ball with this;

 

God, who can see as far into the future as the East is from the West. God, whose word per the Bible is permanent is eternal and omniscient. God, who is all of these things, had to rewrite his service contract halfway through the term due to changing market conditions?

It wasn't the word of god. Jesus is. Until he appears nothing counts unless he says it does. Try and keep up. It's really quite simple. I don't know why you want to attribute things to Christianity that happened before Christianity even existed.

[wiffleball 4,789]

It wasn't the word of god. Jesus is. Until he appears nothing counts unless he says it does. Try and keep up. It's really quite simple. I don't know why you want to attribute things to Christianity that happened before Christianity even existed.

Wrong in so many ways. But ill play for now;

 

please quote me chapter and verse where Jesus comes down on homosexuality.

 

Is that before or after he starts wearing open toed shoes and hanging out with 12 other dudes.?