Twitter permanently suspends Trump's account, citing risk of 'further incitement of violence' – live

[Hawkeye21 550]

4 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Do you defend CNN pressuring cable companies to not carry Fox News? Because they are doing just that. 

Why would I defend that?  Honestly, I don’t think people should watch CNN or Fox News. 

[Strike 1,793]

48 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

Why can’t private companies enforce their terms?

As long as they do so evenly to both sides, that's fine.  When they start making the rules up as they go along or favoring one side or the other it becomes a problem. 

[Mike Honcho 1,579]

2 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Look it up. It’s not my fault you don’t follow the news. 

Sounds like fake news.

[Hawkeye21 550]

Just now, Strike said:

As long as they do so evenly to both sides, that's fine.  When they start making the rules up as they go along or favoring one side or the other it becomes a problem. 

Now that is a legit argument and I can’t believe no one has said it yet. There lies the problem. I 100% agree with people who argue that point. 

[Hardcore troubadour 5,550]

1 minute ago, Mike Honcho said:

Sounds like fake news.

It’s happened before. And it will happen again. Thats why you shouid look it up for yourself if you’re interested. 

[Rusty Syringes 244]

3 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

You want everyone to live in a football guys world as long as you get to live in a fftoday one. 

So the guy whining about my style of expressing myself upon my return to forearm regularly is  about muh free speech in regard to Twitter and Google Play. 

[Rusty Syringes 244]

7 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

Sounds like fake news.

I Googled it and didn't see anything, but what I did see was CNN kicking a reeling Fox's ass in the ratings and Fox losing viewers to nut-right infotainment sources. 

[Hardcore troubadour 5,550]

2 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

So you don't like when bakeries deny wedding cakes to gays?

Depends on what kind of cake it is. A regular cake? They should have to make it. A gay cake? No. Or a Batman cake if they don’t to either. 

[Rusty Syringes 244]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

Depends on what kind of cake it is. A regular cake? They should have to make it. A gay cake? No. Or a Batman cake if they don’t to either. 

Maybe it was a Fox cake.

[Hardcore troubadour 5,550]

8 minutes ago, Rusty Syringes said:

I Googled it and didn't see anything, but what I did see was CNN kicking a reeling Fox's ass in the ratings and Fox losing viewers to nut-right infotainment sources. 

That settles it then. Thanks Rusty. I’m glad it’s not happening. Wait, there it is right on cnn’s website. Is your Google working ok? 

[drobeski 3,056]

15 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

Sounds like fake news.

Debunked 

[tanatastic 1,946]

Don’t let them censor you like that! Get your guns and march on in guys! You can do it! I’ll be cheering you on watching, you got this.

[Patented Phil 238]

So, we have a problem where a bunch of people don’t trust the media, feel isolated and abandoned, and are started to devolve into violence and conspiracy theories. Hey - I got an idea!  Let’s censor them and make them even more extreme!

[Patented Phil 238]

3 hours ago, Hawkeye21 said:

Exactly. It’s a business decision. It’s not a violation of anyone’s rights. 

I don’t think anyone is arguing it’s illegal. Just dumb.

[Voltaire 2,056]

56 minutes ago, Rusty Syringes said:

Baloney. The First Amendment secures the right to free speech, not the platform on which to express it.

Platforms have every right to control what gets spoken through them.

Don't like it? Find another platform or create your own. 

They don't so long as they are operating under the Section 130(number may be wrong) law as a service provider and not a publisher. Now that they clearly want to manage speech, would you agree with me that they should be forced to transition to publisher and be responsible for the people who post there? That law should be enforced. One of my biggest complaints about Trump was how he sat on his ass and did nothing about the way they abused content creators on their platform for his entire time in office and look where it's gotten him. If they do want to be responsible for the content, I have no issue with them censoring whoever they want but they can't have it both ways.

[tanatastic 1,946]

Hearing he wants to make his own Twitter like platform. He could call it Trumper. Not a bad idea really, a lot of people would use it. 

[Hardcore troubadour 5,550]

27 minutes ago, tanatastic said:

Hearing he wants to make his own Twitter like platform. He could call it Trumper. Not a bad idea really, a lot of people would use it. 

Will there be porn? 

[Voltaire 2,056]

2 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Will there be porn? 

Probably need a spinoff site called 'Thumper' for that.

[Utilit99 1,217]

4 hours ago, Rusty Syringes said:

So the guy whining about my style of expressing myself upon my return to forearm regularly is  about muh free speech in regard to Twitter and Google Play. 

I bet he just knows you're stupid is all. 

You being a lib cat lady walking around with a participation trophy is  not really showing anyone much. Just saying. 

[listen2me 23 399]

Its funny.  When Trump tweets about upcoming protest and says its going to be wild that means he incited a riot.

When Kamala Harris tweets out a link to help fund bail for violent rioters qho got arrested....that isnt inciting violence and no one cared.

Astonishing how that works.  

[hoytdwow 201]

9 hours ago, Patented Phil said:

I don’t think anyone is arguing it’s illegal. Just dumb.

There are actually plenty of people “arguing” it’s a First Amendment issue

This congressman for example: 

So many right wing focktards don’t understand capitalism or the Constitution 

[Hardcore troubadour 5,550]

25 minutes ago, hoytdwow said:

There are actually plenty of people “arguing” it’s a First Amendment issue

This congressman for example: 

So many right wing focktards don’t understand capitalism or the Constitution 

And easily manipulated libtards don’t know grandstanding when they see it. It’s what they’re used to, it’s all the people they vote for do. 

[usurpers26 26]

9 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Will there be porn? 

Yes but only two categories...Trump/Ivanka fetish and Pedo Joe.

[TimHauck 89]

Typical politician, Nikki Haley playing both sides and probably trying to set up her run in 2024 (and I’m sure hoping to sell a few books too):

https://thehill.com/homenews/news/533402-nikki-haley-on-capitol-riot-trump-badly-wrong-with-his-words

 

 

[jonmx 107]

2 hours ago, hoytdwow said:

There are actually plenty of people “arguing” it’s a First Amendment issue

This congressman for example: 

So many right wing focktards don’t understand capitalism or the Constitution 

Censorship is the tool of fascism.  Monopolies destroy true capitalism and undermine the Constitution.  But dipshit leftists are just fascist so it is not surprising they support it. 

[RLLD 1,456]

There are other means to get ones voice heard, but unfortunately the leftists have control of the most effective ones.

 

[Hardcore troubadour 5,550]

Why swim in the ocean that is twitter when you can swim freely in lakes? 

[JustinCharge 846]

Probably posted already and seen by many here, but adding it.

 

[JustinCharge 846]

54 minutes ago, RLLD said:

There are other means to get ones voice heard, but unfortunately the leftists have control of the most effective ones.

Why should blacks be allowed to force their way into the Woolworth diner?  There are other restaurants.

[hoytdwow 201]

The Twitter store decided to stop carrying The Trump brand of products.

[TimHauck 89]

25 minutes ago, JustinCharge said:

Probably posted already and seen by many here, but adding it.

 

LOL if he thinks he's going to get banned for that

[RaiderHaters Revenge 1,714]

the problem lies in the fact that both Fuckerberg and Dorsey sat before congress claiming to be a platform that doesn't censor conservatives

 

[Patented Phil 238]

2 hours ago, jonmx said:

Censorship is the tool of fascism.  Monopolies destroy true capitalism and undermine the Constitution.  But dipshit leftists are just fascist so it is not surprising they support it. 

Exactly. Anomalies like like Trump come and go. Long-term I think the more concerning issue is the Left’s vice-grip on the MSM and social media, and their propensity to favor censorship.

[BufordT 190]

Conservatives are flocking to a new 'free speech' social media app that has started banning liberal users

I only posted the article.  I don't necessarily agree with it.  But its nice to see there's a safe space for repub's and trumpers to go if they want.

They should be doing more of this.

[Hawkeye21 550]

56 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

the problem lies in the fact that both Fuckerberg and Dorsey sat before congress claiming to be a platform that doesn't censor conservatives

 

They didn’t ban him for being conservative though. They banned him for violating their terms. 

[Patented Phil 238]

6 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

They didn’t ban him for being conservative though. They banned him for violating their terms. 

Do you think Twitter was equally consistent in banning BLM and Liberal activists for violating their terms last summer?

[Cdub100 1,631]

9 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

They didn’t ban him for being conservative though. They banned him for violating their terms. 

Sure they did.

[Patented Phil 238]

10 minutes ago, BufordT said:

Conservatives are flocking to a new 'free speech' social media app that has started banning liberal users

I only posted the article.  I don't necessarily agree with it.  But its nice to see there's a safe space for repub's and trumpers to go if they want.

They should be doing more of this.

I’m not sure a country can survive for very long having two different everythings for Left and Right.

[Cdub100 1,631]

Just now, Patented Phil said:

I’m not sure a country can survive for very long having two different everythings for Left and Right.

I agree. The problem is one side just cannot handle anything but total lockstep thought. To disagree is hate speech. and right now that side controls the public square.

Very sad and dark times.

[Patented Phil 238]

1 minute ago, Cdub100 said:

I agree. The problem is one side just cannot handle anything but total lockstep thought. To disagree is hate speech. and right now that side controls the public square.

Very sad and dark times.

It won’t end well. Just a matter of time before the angry group that stormed the Capitol starts storming Twitter, Facebook and CNN.