Official President Trump Impeachment Inquiry Thread

[Hawkeye21 1,855]

14 minutes ago, Intense Observer said:

Ironically, this is exactly what the left is attempting to do right now.

We have a crazy biotch in the Senate urging Twitter to ban the President.

San Francisco just labeled the NRA a terrorist organization.

The 2019 Democratic Party is not much different than the Nazi Party. 

 

I’ve never been concerned with anyone trying to take guns away. It won’t happen. 

I also don’t see much happening with censorship. Doesn’t concern me either. 

[Fireballer 2,384]

49 minutes ago, Intense Observer said:

 

Well, today we learn that the State Dept IG actually was releasing information that shows the US ambassador to Ukraine was actively trying to prevent Ukraine officials from getting documents to the US regarding the Biden investigation.

 

 

This is the same ambassador that caused all the MUH TRUMP! rhetoric? Like the ambassador resigning made trump instantly guilty.  I know a few mouth breathers here were hanging their hat on it.

[Cdub100 3,384]

3 hours ago, MDC said:

The guy Joe supposedly got shiitcanned for investigating Hunter, only he wasn’t investigating Hunter and the IMF wanted him out too?

Crime of the century.

Hunter’s position with this company looks scummy but I’m not sure Don wants to get into trading allegations about family members’ shady overseas business dealings. 

Biden said he got the prosecutor "siitcanned" I don't know why you put the word supposedly in your sentence. Also nobody is saying it's the crime of century, but it sure seems like what he did was a crime. He admitted to doing it so we should do an investigation. 

 

ETA - Running for president does not protect you from being investigated as we all know from these past 4 years.

[Gladiators 1,904]

Did they get him this time?

[MDC 5,895]

1 hour ago, Cdub100 said:

Biden said he got the prosecutor "siitcanned" I don't know why you put the word supposedly in your sentence. Also nobody is saying it's the crime of century, but it sure seems like what he did was a crime. He admitted to doing it so we should do an investigation. 

 

ETA - Running for president does not protect you from being investigated as we all know from these past 4 years.

Encouragung Ukraine to fire a prosecutor is a crime now?  

[Hardcore troubadour 12,659]

Just now, MDC said:

Encouragung Ukraine to fire a prosecutor is a crime now?  

"Encouraging"? how about you pay attention and read something or stfu? Straight up clown. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 2,524]

41 minutes ago, MDC said:

Encouragung Ukraine to fire a prosecutor is a crime now?  

After Biden threatened to withhold aid - the same thing they're accusing Trump of doing, no?

[MDC 5,895]

3 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

After Biden threatened to withhold aid - the same thing they're accusing Trump of doing, no?

No, they’re accusing Trump of threatening to withhold aid if they don’t investigate the Bidens for partisan political purposes that have nothing to do with US policy.

Nobody would care if Trump tried to strongarm Ukraine for some US policy interest. 

HTH?

[SUXBNME 1,340]

11 hours ago, fandandy said:

Just to voice my displeasure on this site changes, I hate that you can't delete what is considered an edited thread when the only edit done was to change the focking size of the font.

Yea?  Well, I didn't like the PM you sent me last week.  Small cack pic you promised. 
That thing was fukkin huuuge 

[TBayXXXVII 2,117]

10 hours ago, MDC said:

No, they’re accusing Trump of threatening to withhold aid if they don’t investigate the Bidens for partisan political purposes that have nothing to do with US policy.

Nobody would care if Trump tried to strongarm Ukraine for some US policy interest. 

HTH?

LOL, come on.  Now you're just lying.  Stop.

[MDC 5,895]

7 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

LOL, come on.  Now you're just lying.  Stop.

Nope - that is a fact. I don’t think this goes anywhere other than maybe censure, and I think Congressional Dems are purely trolling Don here, but that is the nature of the complaint. Lotta Reps are being willfully obtuse on this one.

[Reality 2,710]

15 hours ago, drobeski said:

Looks like this CIA operative contacted team shifty before IG. Disqualified to be a whistleblower.  He/she along with shifty appear to have committed treason in this orchestrated illegal attempt to take down a president.  

Yea, this thing isn't going to end well for some folks..  Lots of shady sh!t going on..

NY Times reporting it.

16 hours ago, Reality said:

News that surprises nobody..

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/02/us/politics/adam-schiff-whistleblower.html#click=https://t.co/9PxtBDXQYp

Classic witch-hunt, complete with CIA operatives and secret meetings with Democratic leaders before officially reporting..

Kind of sad you guys all got caught up in this but, looks like Trump was correct.

 

[TBayXXXVII 2,117]

4 minutes ago, MDC said:

Nope - that is a fact. I don’t think this goes anywhere other than maybe censure, and I think Congressional Dems are purely trolling Don here, but that is the nature of the complaint. Lotta Reps are being willfully obtuse on this one.

No it's not.  Trump was strong arming the Ukraines because he wants them, like every other European country, to pay their fair share.  That is a US policy interest... but you claimed "Nobody would care...".

[MDC 5,895]

1 minute ago, TBayXXXVII said:

No it's not.  Trump was strong arming the Ukraines because he wants them, like every other European country, to pay their fair share.  That is a US policy interest... but you claimed "Nobody would care...".

The allegation is that Trump was withholding $ to force Ukraine to investigate Biden for his own political re-election reasons.

It’s right there in Nancy’s statement. 

[TBayXXXVII 2,117]

1 minute ago, MDC said:

The allegation is that Trump was withholding $ to force Ukraine to investigate Biden for his own political re-election reasons.

It’s right there in Nancy’s statement. 

Yes... that's what they said, but that's not what Trump did.  So apparently the Dems do care that he's doing things that benefit the US.  That's why they have to pretend he did something else.

[MDC 5,895]

10 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

Yes... that's what they said, but that's not what Trump did.  So apparently the Dems do care that he's doing things that benefit the US.  That's why they have to pretend he did something else.

As long as we agree that he’s not being investigated for simply pressuring the Ukraine into doing something I will call that progress.  

[IGotWorms 3,315]

Just as I suspected, the “transcript” of the Ukraine call was apparently altered:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/10/03/odd-markings-ellipses-fuel-doubts-about-rough-transcript-trumps-ukraine-call/%3foutputType=amp

[IGotWorms 3,315]

I wonder if they altered it before hiding it on the secret black ops server or after before releasing it to Congress

[Hardcore troubadour 12,659]

23 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Just as I suspected, the “transcript” of the Ukraine call was apparently altered:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/10/03/odd-markings-ellipses-fuel-doubts-about-rough-transcript-trumps-ukraine-call/%3foutputType=amp

"Fueld doubts". You don't even need to get past the headline.  

[Reality 2,710]

7 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

"Fueld doubts". You don't even need to get past the headline.  

Clown article, I want the 5 minutes back I spent reading it.

[drobeski 3,061]

45 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Just as I suspected, the “transcript” of the Ukraine call was apparently altered:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/10/03/odd-markings-ellipses-fuel-doubts-about-rough-transcript-trumps-ukraine-call/%3foutputType=amp

Washington post ? mad magazine wasn't available?

[MDC 5,895]

7 minutes ago, drobeski said:

Washington post ? mad magazine wasn't available?

Did Conservative Sandbox cover the story for people on your reading level?

[TimmySmith 2,782]

52 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Just as I suspected, the “transcript” of the Ukraine call was apparently altered:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/10/03/odd-markings-ellipses-fuel-doubts-about-rough-transcript-trumps-ukraine-call/%3foutputType=amp

Sherlock.  I guess that puts the whole whistleblower report in doubt, doesn't it.  

[Reality 2,710]

Just now, TimmySmith said:

Sherlock.  I guess that puts the whole whistleblower report in doubt, doesn't it.  

Right, this dipsh!t has told us for several days the whistleblower report matches the transcript word for word..

Clown.

[drobeski 3,061]

26 minutes ago, MDC said:

Did Conservative Sandbox cover the story for people on your reading level?

Haha do you want me to paste their coverage? ...wait I will..give me a few. 

Real fact based detailed reporting. Its understandable it intimidates you. 

Stick with CNN and MSNBC crybaby soundbites. Facts backed up with links will hurt your feelings and your brain.

[drobeski 3,061]

House Intelligence Committee Was Contacted By CIA ‘Whistle-blower’ Prior to Complaint Construction…

Posted by sundance

More evidence is surfacing showing how the CIA ‘whistle-blower’ complaint was a purposefully constructed political hit-job. Yes, Muh-Ukraine is much like Muh-Russia.

The New York Times reports today the CIA operative approached the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) prior to filling out a ‘whistle-blower’ complaint form.  The CIA gossiper contacted staff of HPSCI Chairman Adam Schiff.

According to the report (written to defend the interests of Schiff et al), the CIA gossiper contacted the HPSCI after the top lawyer for the CIA would not advance his cause. We still suspect the ‘whistle-blower” is Michael Barry. Obviously the Times puts the customary spin on the information:

WASHINGTON — The Democratic head of the House Intelligence Committee, Representative Adam B. Schiff of California, learned about the outlines of a C.I.A. officer’s concerns that President Trump had abused his power days before the officer filed a whistle-blower complaint, according to a spokesman and current and former American officials.

 

The early account by the future whistle-blower shows how determined he was to make known his allegations that Mr. Trump asked Ukraine’s government to interfere on his behalf in the 2020 election. It also explains how Mr. Schiff knew to press for the complaint when the Trump administration initially blocked lawmakers from seeing it.

The C.I.A. officer approached a House Intelligence Committee aide with his concerns about Mr. Trump only after he had had a colleague first convey them to the C.I.A.’s top lawyer. Concerned about how that initial avenue for airing his allegations through the C.I.A. was unfolding, the officer then approached the House aide. In both cases, the original accusation was vague.

The House staff member, following the committee’s procedures, suggested the officer find a lawyer to advise him and meet with an inspector general, with whom he could file a whistle-blower complaint. The aide shared some of what the officer conveyed to Mr. Schiff. The aide did not share the whistle-blower’s identity with Mr. Schiff, an official said. (read more)

What is occurring is becoming clear…

After the 2018 mid-terms, and in preparation for the House “impeachment” strategy, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff and House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler hired Lawfare Group members to become committee staff.

 

 

REPORT THIS AD

Chairman Schiff hired former SDNY U.S. Attorney Daniel Goldman (link), and Chairman Nadler hired Obama Administration lawyer Norm Eisen and criminal defense attorney Barry Berke (link), all are within the Lawfare network.  [You probably saw Berke questioning former Trump campaign chairman Corey Lewandowski.]

It now looks like the Lawfare network constructed the Schiff Dossier, and handed it to allied CIA operative Michael Barry to file as a formal IC complaint.  This process is almost identical to the Fusion-GPS/Lawfare network handing the Steele Dossier to the FBI to use as the evidence for the 2016/2017 Russia conspiracy.

This series of events is exactly what former CIA Analyst Fred Fleiz said last week. Fleitz has extensive knowledge of the whistleblower process. Fleitz said last week the Ukraine call whistleblower is likely driven by political motives, and his sources indicate he had help from Congress members while writing it.  WATCH:

.

Additionally, prior to the “whistleblower complaint” the Intelligence Community Inspector General did not accept whistle-blower claims without first hand knowledge. However, the ICIG revised the protocol to allow this specific complaint to be registered by the CIA whistle-blower.

 

REPORT THIS AD

Now it surfaces that the ICIG Michael Atkinson didn’t even review the Trump-Zelenskyy phone call transcript before forwarding the complaint to congress [SEE HERE]

The Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) is Michael K Atkinson. ICIG Atkinson is the official who accepted the ridiculous premise of a hearsay ‘whistle-blower‘ complaint; an intelligence whistleblower who was “blowing-the-whistle” based on second hand information of a phone call without any direct personal knowledge, ie ‘hearsay‘.

The center of the Lawfare Alliance influence was/is the Department of Justice National Security Division, DOJ-NSD. It was the DOJ-NSD running the Main Justice side of the 2016 operations to support Operation Crossfire Hurricane and FBI agent Peter Strzok. It was also the DOJ-NSD where the sketchy legal theories around FARA violations (Sec. 901) originated.

Michael K Atkinson was previously the Senior Counsel to the Assistant Attorney General of the National Security Division of the Department of Justice (DOJ-NSD) in 2016. That makes Atkinson senior legal counsel to John Carlin and Mary McCord who were the former heads of the DOJ-NSD in 2016 when the stop Trump operation was underway.

Michael Atkinson was the lawyer for the same DOJ-NSD players who: (1) lied to the FISA court (Judge Rosemary Collyer) about the 80% non compliant NSA database abuse using FBI contractors; (2) filed the FISA application against Carter Page; and (3) used FARA violations as tools for political surveillance and political targeting.

Yes, that means Michael Atkinson was Senior Counsel for the DOJ-NSD, at the very epicenter of the political weaponization and FISA abuse.

If the DOJ-NSD exploitation of the NSA database, and/or DOJ-NSD FISA abuse, and/or DOJ-NSD FARA corruption were ever to reach sunlight, current ICIG Atkinson -as the lawyer for the process- would be under a lot of scrutiny for his involvement.

Yes, that gives current ICIG Michael Atkinson a strong and corrupt motive to participate with the Pelosi-Schiff/Lawfare impeachment objective.

 

[Cdub100 3,384]

They can't even do hit jobs right. 

[Strike 3,979]

1 minute ago, Cdub100 said:

They can't even do hit jobs right. 

They should have talked to Bill and Hitlery.

[drobeski 3,061]

That folks is how real fact backed and linked reporting is done. And its petrifying to mdc. 

[IGotWorms 3,315]

1 hour ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

"Fueld doubts". You don't even need to get past the headline.  

If you’d actually bothered to read it you’d see it has about half the words that would be typical for the length of the phone call. So either there were A LOT of long awkward silences, or...

[IGotWorms 3,315]

56 minutes ago, Reality said:

Clown article, I want the 5 minutes back I spent reading it.

It’s funny but also a little sad when you guys use aliases to back each other up  

[Hardcore troubadour 12,659]

This one went 4 days before the libtards started backing off. That's pretty good for them.  

[Strike 3,979]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

This one went 4 days before the libtards started backing off. That's pretty good for them.  

And yet we still have Worms, but he's always been a little bit slow.

[Reality 2,710]

1 minute ago, Strike said:

And yet we still have Worms, but he's always been a little bit slow.

He's basically throwing in the towel now, once he starts calling people aliases..  You know it's a wrap.

[12th Man 884]

19 hours ago, Reality said:

News that surprises nobody..

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/02/us/politics/adam-schiff-whistleblower.html#click=https://t.co/9PxtBDXQYp

Classic witch-hunt, complete with CIA operatives and secret meetings with Democratic leaders before officially reporting..

Kind of sad you guys all got caught up in this but, looks like Trump was correct.

MDC is such a sheep. Poor bastard.

 

[12th Man 884]

34 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

It’s funny but also a little sad when you guys use aliases to back each other up  

Gun thrown

 

[drobeski 3,061]

CNN now onto China, but rest assured they let us know there is no evidence the Bidens did anything wrong. None at all,  nope. 

1.5 billion was legit and earned. 

So dont go thinking the bidens did anything bad, CNN debunked it for us, it's  now officially a debunked conspiracy theory. 

This is about trump and only trump. Stay focused sheep stay focused. 

[TimmySmith 2,782]

59 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

If you’d actually bothered to read it you’d see it has about half the words that would be typical for the length of the phone call. So either there were A LOT of long awkward silences, or...

Dude, just put the link for CNN streaming....  "1/2 the words for typical length phone call"

[drobeski 3,061]

"1/2 the words for a typical call ? 

They're really going with that ? My God how stupid do they know their audience is ?

[Hardcore troubadour 12,659]

3 minutes ago, drobeski said:

"1/2 the words for a typical call ? 

They're really going with that ? My God how stupid do they know their audience is ?

What's a typical call? Worms, care to weigh in?