*Official 2020 Election Thread*

[supermike80 1,922]

13 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

You are protesting our discussion of possible election shenanigans.  Let’s do some math:  say that Biden has a 99.9% chance of getting any one vote.  What are the odds of him getting 100,000 in a row?  Well, that is .999^-100000, or 3.6^-42%.  Or, 0.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000036%

You are right, that is quite possible.   

Im not protesting it.  Im saying you guys are acting like the liberals in 2016.   Which you ALLLLL whined against.

I hate hypocrisy in politics.  

[Hardcore troubadour 15,457]

Just now, supermike80 said:

Im not protesting it.  Im saying you guys are acting like the liberals in 2016.   Which you ALLLLL whined against.

I hate hypocrisy in politics.  

Huh? I see people questioning fraud, that occurred. Why is that whining? Half of the libtards left here last time and haven’t been back. Nice try Mike. 

[supermike80 1,922]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

Huh? I see people questioning fraud, that occurred. Why is that whining? Half of the libtards left here last time and haven’t been back. Nice try Mike. 

Ok.   

[RLLD 4,237]

1 minute ago, supermike80 said:

Im not protesting it.  Im saying you guys are acting like the liberals in 2016.   Which you ALLLLL whined against.

I hate hypocrisy in politics.  

But, politics IS hypocrisy....people appear to treat politics as something legitimate when its nothing more than lies to buy votes.

Politics is changing the meaning of words, values, and deceit.....

[TimHauck 2,882]

Is Biden going to win Georgia?

[Gladiators 1,992]

Just now, TimHauck said:

Is Biden going to win Georgia?

If he needs to, yes.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,457]

Just now, TimHauck said:

Is Biden going to win Georgia?

This guy. FYI, you’re being a bit obvious. 

[TimHauck 2,882]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

This guy. FYI, you’re being a bit obvious. 

What do you mean? 

[Strike 5,562]

1 minute ago, supermike80 said:

Im not protesting it.  Im saying you guys are acting like the liberals in 2016.   Which you ALLLLL whined against.

I hate hypocrisy in politics.  

This is absolutely false.  The Dems complaint in 2016 was that the Russians influenced the election, which has since been shown to not only have merit, but that the basis of their complaint was actions by Clinton and the Dems themselves!!!  The GOP complaint this year is that there are shenanighans in vote counting and they are simply asking that steps be taken to ensure the integrity of that process.  I'm sorry you don't see the difference.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,457]

Just now, TimHauck said:

What do you mean? 

Have your fun. Just know it’s not working. 

[TimHauck 2,882]

1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Have your fun. Just know it’s not working. 

I voted for Trump, as I said earlier

[MTSkiBum 1,620]

25 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

You are protesting our discussion of possible election shenanigans.  Let’s do some math:  say that Biden has a 99.9% chance of getting any one vote.  What are the odds of him getting 100,000 in a row?  Well, that is .999^-100000, or 3.6^-42%.  Or, 0.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000036%

You are right, that is quite possible.   

 

A Wall Street Journal examination of snapshots of the Associated Press’s live election feed, taken every two minutes, shows no such jump in the tally for Mr. Biden occurred. By the time the AP reported Mr. Biden had garnered as many votes as appeared in the first social-media image, Mr. Trump had already been attributed at least 20,000 more votes than the picture showed.

The false claim that Mr. Trump shared underscores the test facing social-media platforms that have pledged to prevent election-related abuses of their tools. Twitter minutes later added a warning label to Mr. Trump’s post and other prominent ones like it, but that didn’t stop the president’s tweet from garnering more than 177,000 replies, retweets and likes.

Matt Mackowiak, a Texas-based Republican consultant, whose post was shared by the president, deleted his Tweet three hours after posting it. He explained on Twitter that he had shared the post honestly, but removed the tweet once he learned that the data referenced “was a typo in one county.”

https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/trump-biden-election-day-2020/card/myg0PPnyCePAcnvufS3k

[tanatastic 2,062]

5 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Is Biden going to win Georgia?

Nah not happening. He wins when Nevada clicks in.

[Big Guy 1,412]

27 minutes ago, KSB2424 said:

 

absolute fraud!!!

[Voltaire 5,317]

We'll see what happens. The wheels are just now turning and the truth will emerge. 

If those ballot dumps are legal votes, it'll be provable. On the other hand, this isn't the Guided Age. if you stuff the ballot box and expect get away with it, there should be a trail to follow to prove it wrong.  I'm not saying I know what's going to emerge, only at present, it sure looks and feels shady. I simply can't get over the ballot dump as it seemed Trump won the election on Nov 3rd but it could really be true those were legit ballots. That's why I look forward to the legal challenges because I want to see the evidence for and against whether these Biden ballot dumps were legitimately cast votes or fake.

Trump is a pit bull who will not roll over, he's going to fight. Fortunately, Trump is likely to get a fair hearing in court, rather than decided by the media and Big Tech who have wanted to crucify him from the beginning and sometime soon are going to call the election for Biden. 

Buckle Up.

[drobeski 3,061]

10 minutes ago, MTSkiBum said:

 

A Wall Street Journal examination of snapshots of the Associated Press’s live election feed, taken every two minutes, shows no such jump in the tally for Mr. Biden occurred. By the time the AP reported Mr. Biden had garnered as many votes as appeared in the first social-media image, Mr. Trump had already been attributed at least 20,000 more votes than the picture showed.

The false claim that Mr. Trump shared underscores the test facing social-media platforms that have pledged to prevent election-related abuses of their tools. Twitter minutes later added a warning label to Mr. Trump’s post and other prominent ones like it, but that didn’t stop the president’s tweet from garnering more than 177,000 replies, retweets and likes.

Matt Mackowiak, a Texas-based Republican consultant, whose post was shared by the president, deleted his Tweet three hours after posting it. He explained on Twitter that he had shared the post honestly, but removed the tweet once he learned that the data referenced “was a typo in one county.”

https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/trump-biden-election-day-2020/card/myg0PPnyCePAcnvufS3k

Why does a guy in the oil business want Biden? 

[RLLD 4,237]

2 minutes ago, drobeski said:

Why does a guy in the oil business want Biden? 

Biden's son is apparently some kind of energy guru, probably supports him just to get to Hunter....since he is worth millions and what not

[FlyinHeadlock 459]

He's comfortable with the market value of 10 for the Big Guy.

[supermike80 1,922]

22 minutes ago, RLLD said:

But, politics IS hypocrisy....people appear to treat politics as something legitimate when its nothing more than lies to buy votes.

Politics is changing the meaning of words, values, and deceit.....

Dude..I have been saying this.  Its NOT exclusive to the libs.....But this bored seems to be thinking somehow this is the first time there has been political malfeasance.  

[Voltaire 5,317]

21 minutes ago, MTSkiBum said:

 

A Wall Street Journal examination of snapshots of the Associated Press’s live election feed, taken every two minutes, shows no such jump in the tally for Mr. Biden occurred. By the time the AP reported Mr. Biden had garnered as many votes as appeared in the first social-media image, Mr. Trump had already been attributed at least 20,000 more votes than the picture showed.

The false claim that Mr. Trump shared underscores the test facing social-media platforms that have pledged to prevent election-related abuses of their tools. Twitter minutes later added a warning label to Mr. Trump’s post and other prominent ones like it, but that didn’t stop the president’s tweet from garnering more than 177,000 replies, retweets and likes.

Matt Mackowiak, a Texas-based Republican consultant, whose post was shared by the president, deleted his Tweet three hours after posting it. He explained on Twitter that he had shared the post honestly, but removed the tweet once he learned that the data referenced “was a typo in one county.”

https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/trump-biden-election-day-2020/card/myg0PPnyCePAcnvufS3k

I saw the jump with my own eyes in real time. I live overseas, it happened mid-afternoon, I was up and invested in the process. There has to be hundreds of thousands or millions of others who saw the same thing. What I cannot vouch for however, is total number of votes recorded before and after the jump occurred as I was only looking at the percentage numbers. So that 20,000 number... honestly, maybe. I can't say one way or the other about that.

Look, it was a massive irregularity that I'd never seen before. Numbers don't go from 9.6% lead to 1.3% in one update when there's upwarrds of 85% of the vote in. (Those numbers are not real, I made them up as an example since I don't remember the numbers, but it was something like that.) A 9.6 lead becomes 9.5 becomes 9.3 become 9.0 gradually. Drip drip drip. Maybe a half hour or 45 minutes later you're underwater if the trend takes you there. It doesn't fall off a cliff instantaneously which is what I saw happened from one update to the next. 

 

[RLLD 4,237]

9 minutes ago, supermike80 said:

Dude..I have been saying this.  Its NOT exclusive to the libs.....But this bored seems to be thinking somehow this is the first time there has been political malfeasance.  

Agree.  Its all parties, all people, its how you survive in politics.

Trump was the exception in that his lies were silly, mostly jokes, his truths were palpable though.....Biden is simply a liar through and through, and Harris is worse.

[JustinCharge 2,397]

14 minutes ago, supermike80 said:

Dude..I have been saying this.  Its NOT exclusive to the libs.....But this bored seems to be thinking somehow this is the first time there has been political malfeasance.  

If we had a close race like this in 2000 with questionable ballots and whatnot, people would be upset but they'd get over it pretty quickly because people had a lot more trust in the system.  This happening in 2020 very likely means war because trust is gone. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,457]

2 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Agree.  Its all parties, all people, its how you survive in politics.

Trump was the exception in that his lies were silly, mostly jokes, his truths were palpable though.....Biden is simply a liar through and through, and Harris is worse.

Trump lies weren’t the big problem for the liberals. It was his truths. Ignore the truth and blow up the lie. 

[jerryskids 6,805]

28 minutes ago, MTSkiBum said:

 

A Wall Street Journal examination of snapshots of the Associated Press’s live election feed, taken every two minutes, shows no such jump in the tally for Mr. Biden occurred. By the time the AP reported Mr. Biden had garnered as many votes as appeared in the first social-media image, Mr. Trump had already been attributed at least 20,000 more votes than the picture showed.

The false claim that Mr. Trump shared underscores the test facing social-media platforms that have pledged to prevent election-related abuses of their tools. Twitter minutes later added a warning label to Mr. Trump’s post and other prominent ones like it, but that didn’t stop the president’s tweet from garnering more than 177,000 replies, retweets and likes.

Matt Mackowiak, a Texas-based Republican consultant, whose post was shared by the president, deleted his Tweet three hours after posting it. He explained on Twitter that he had shared the post honestly, but removed the tweet once he learned that the data referenced “was a typo in one county.”

https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/trump-biden-election-day-2020/card/myg0PPnyCePAcnvufS3k

Fair enough.  I would still argue that there are irregularities which, if you do the math, are highly improbable.  Wisconsin’s 90-ish % voter turnout is, umm... very high, for instance.

[MDC 7,447]

9 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Trump was the exception in that his lies were silly, mostly jokes

I liked the one about Covid being a libturd hoax that would magically vanish by spring. 

Ha.

[posty 2,702]

38 minutes ago, MTSkiBum said:

 

A Wall Street Journal examination of snapshots of the Associated Press’s live election feed, taken every two minutes, shows no such jump in the tally for Mr. Biden occurred. By the time the AP reported Mr. Biden had garnered as many votes as appeared in the first social-media image, Mr. Trump had already been attributed at least 20,000 more votes than the picture showed.

The false claim that Mr. Trump shared underscores the test facing social-media platforms that have pledged to prevent election-related abuses of their tools. Twitter minutes later added a warning label to Mr. Trump’s post and other prominent ones like it, but that didn’t stop the president’s tweet from garnering more than 177,000 replies, retweets and likes.

Matt Mackowiak, a Texas-based Republican consultant, whose post was shared by the president, deleted his Tweet three hours after posting it. He explained on Twitter that he had shared the post honestly, but removed the tweet once he learned that the data referenced “was a typo in one county.”

https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/trump-biden-election-day-2020/card/myg0PPnyCePAcnvufS3k

Is there any way you can post the entire article?  WSJ is blocked at work...

Please and thank you...

[FlyinHeadlock 459]

1 minute ago, jerryskids said:

Fair enough.  I would still argue that there are irregularities which, if you do the math, are highly improbable.  Wisconsin’s 90-ish % voter turnout is, umm... very high, for instance.

For each county. Heard that. Maybe some but all...looks shady as phuck. Not impossible but it does need another set of eyes on it. 

[supermike80 1,922]

43 minutes ago, Strike said:

This is absolutely false.  The Dems complaint in 2016 was that the Russians influenced the election, which has since been shown to not only have merit, but that the basis of their complaint was actions by Clinton and the Dems themselves!!!  The GOP complaint this year is that there are shenanighans in vote counting and they are simply asking that steps be taken to ensure the integrity of that process.  I'm sorry you don't see the difference.

Somehow I don't believe youre TRULY sorry

[Big Guy 1,412]

23 minutes ago, FlyinHeadlock said:

He's comfortable with the market value of 10 for the Big Guy.

don't look at me 

[Strike 5,562]

3 minutes ago, supermike80 said:

Somehow I don't believe youre TRULY sorry

Saddened might be a better word.  But I'm not really that either.  But it is a sad reflection on the state of our country that so many people think this crap is acceptable.

[supermike80 1,922]

Just now, Strike said:

Saddened might be a better word.  But I'm not really that either.  But it is a sad reflection on the state of our country that so many people think this crap is acceptable.

I'll accept that answer

[RLLD 4,237]

7 minutes ago, MDC said:

I liked the one about Covid being a libturd hoax that would magically vanish by spring. 

Ha.

Me too, luckily I don't treat the President as the "dear leader" as Liberals seem inclined.  Thinking for oneself, you should try it.... 

[drobeski 3,061]

1 minute ago, Strike said:

Saddened might be a better word.  But I'm not really that either.  But it is a sad reflection on the state of our country that so many people think this crap is acceptable.

He's upset Trump didn't just roll over and take in the ass from the corrupt cheaters. They're so used to doing it themselves,  they hate when others don't.  

[Hardcore troubadour 15,457]

4 minutes ago, Strike said:

Saddened might be a better word.  But I'm not really that either.  But it is a sad reflection on the state of our country that so many people think this crap is acceptable.

Exactly. A bunch of cities known for corruption did some corruption and the rest of our votes were undone. Sad is the right word. I’m not breaking anything or cursing at the kids. Just shaking my head. 

[posty 2,702]

 

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,355]

1 minute ago, posty said:

 

not fraud

Black Sheep

going back to listening to Cracker

 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,457]

16 minutes ago, posty said:

 

Unleash the hounds. 

[TimHauck 2,882]

1 hour ago, tanatastic said:

Nah not happening. He wins when Nevada clicks in.

GA down to 14k vote difference.  But 99% reporting (according to AP)

[edjr 6,599]

Is not the people who voted, that counts, is the people who count the votes

[drobeski 3,061]

Just now, edjr said:

Is not the people who voted, that counts, is the people who count the votes

Stalin ?