[** Official President Joe Biden Thread **]

[Pimpadeaux 2,406]

Clownzo-loving racist charged with sucker punching black woman.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/proud-boys-leader-yells-racist-125109510.html

[Hardcore troubadour 15,517]

Some Biden voter smeared feces on a woman’s face in the subway in NYC. Unprovoked, had it in a bag, didn’t know her. Did someone get punched somewhere? 

[jerryskids 6,852]

2 hours ago, NorthernVike said:

Please let me know how she is even remotely close to being qualified  for the job.  Slept with the boss?

Remember that Barack was famously unqualified; we just couldn't discuss it because we would instantly be labeled raciss.  He was a one-term senator whose claim to fame was the most "present" votes in the senate.  And prior to that... what exactly?  Some amorphous "community organizing"?  It was almost as if he was being groomed and intentionally kept out of anything that could be remotely controversial, until his time arrived.  The Dems played that one beautifully; I can respect a winning strategy when I see it. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,517]

15 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Remember that Barack was famously unqualified; we just couldn't discuss it because we would instantly be labeled raciss.  He was a one-term senator whose claim to fame was the most "present" votes in the senate.  And prior to that... what exactly?  Some amorphous "community organizing"?  It was almost as if he was being groomed and intentionally kept out of anything that could be remotely controversial, until his time arrived.  The Dems played that one beautifully; I can respect a winning strategy when I see it. 

He gave a good speech. Harry Reid didn’t want to put up with the Clinton’s bullshit. He told Obama to run, he would make sure he got the nomination. Economy collapsed. Obama won. 

[MDC 7,509]

47 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Remember that Barack was famously unqualified; we just couldn't discuss it because we would instantly be labeled raciss.  He was a one-term senator whose claim to fame was the most "present" votes in the senate.  And prior to that... what exactly?  Some amorphous "community organizing"?  It was almost as if he was being groomed and intentionally kept out of anything that could be remotely controversial, until his time arrived.  The Dems played that one beautifully; I can respect a winning strategy when I see it. 

I also have to respect the GOP for selling a guy with a 40-year record of bankruptcies, business fraud, infidelity and sexual assault as a salt-of-the-earth working class champion. 

That took chutzpah!  

[Bert 1,128]

3 minutes ago, MDC said:

I also have to respect the GOP for selling a guy with a 40-year record of bankruptcies, business fraud, infidelity and sexual assault as a salt-of-the-earth working class champion. 

That took chutzpah!  

It's called the Bill Clinton strategy.  

[DonS 3,292]

1 minute ago, Bert said:

It's called the Bill Clinton strategy.  

Clinton gets a pass on the infidelity and sexual assault given who he is married to. 

[Utilit99 4,099]

7 minutes ago, MDC said:

I also have to respect the GOP for selling a guy with a 40-year record of bankruptcies, business fraud, infidelity and sexual assault as a salt-of-the-earth working class champion. 

That took chutzpah!  

And to think, that same guy was the greatest president this nation has ever seen.

And your hero creepy joe is tearing this country apart after his hero hussien caused a massive racial divide. 

Duuuhhhee, gee, aren't liberals like you so smart? Yuck, yuck, yuck.

TRUMP!!!  

[Hardcore troubadour 15,517]

11 minutes ago, MDC said:

I also have to respect the GOP for selling a guy with a 40-year record of bankruptcies, business fraud, infidelity and sexual assault as a salt-of-the-earth working class champion. 

That took chutzpah!  

Yeah, the GOP loved him. So ignorant. 

[jerryskids 6,852]

40 minutes ago, MDC said:

I also have to respect the GOP for selling a guy with a 40-year record of bankruptcies, business fraud, infidelity and sexual assault as a salt-of-the-earth working class champion. 

That took chutzpah!  

I love the bankruptcies angle, it shows an ignorance of how the business world works.  VCs prefer to invest in founders who have a few failed companies under their belt; there is no shame in that, and it shows that you have at least been exposed to (and hopefully learned from) the myriad things which can cause a company to fail.

Obama, Biden, Bernie... wouldn't know how to run an enterprise with a gun to their head.  They have only the experience of political power, which works until it doesn't, and they have no adversity or real-world experience in their careers to fall back on.

It truly amazes me that folks like you on the left can't understand the allure of Trump.  People in the midwest were pleading to bring back jobs.  The response from the political elite:  no problem, I'll propose the HUIDOSAFHQZ plan to send you money!  The response from Trump:  jobs, I hear ya, jobs, let's try to get these jobs back.

You can argue his success, but the resonance of the message should be clear.   

 

[MDC 7,509]

7 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

I love the bankruptcies angle, it shows an ignorance of how the business world works.  VCs prefer to invest in founders who have a few failed companies under their belt; there is no shame in that, and it shows that you have at least been exposed to (and hopefully learned from) the myriad things which can cause a company to fail.

Obama, Biden, Bernie... wouldn't know how to run an enterprise with a gun to their head.  They have only the experience of political power, which works until it doesn't, and they have no adversity or real-world experience in their careers to fall back on.

It truly amazes me that folks like you on the left can't understand the allure of Trump.  People in the midwest were pleading to bring back jobs.  The response from the political elite:  no problem, I'll propose the HUIDOSAFHQZ plan to send you money!  The response from Trump:  jobs, I hear ya, jobs, let's try to get these jobs back.

You can argue his success, but the resonance of the message should be clear.   

 

Trump’s messaging was great! If only his policies weren’t the same GOP boilerplate we’ve seen for decades: tax cuts, deregulation, anti-labor etc.  

He was funny though.

[Utilit99 4,099]

12 minutes ago, MDC said:

Trump’s messaging was great! If only his policies weren’t the same GOP boilerplate we’ve seen for decades: tax cuts, deregulation, anti-labor etc.  

He was funny though.

You keep doubling down on your failures. 

And keep failing. 

[lod001 1,344]

Simply a clueless, brainless complete idiot.

 

[TheNewGirl 1,500]

1 hour ago, MDC said:

Trump’s messaging was great! If only his policies weren’t the same GOP boilerplate we’ve seen for decades: tax cuts, deregulation, anti-labor etc.  

He was funny though.

If you allow tax cuts for corporations, they can hire more or pay their employees more. You increase their taxes and they lay people off and/or increase the costs to the customers. 

Cutting back on some regulations allows companies to produce more, rely more on our products here, than the non-regulated lead-filled BS we get from China. 

Of course these are just strawman arguments, and very simplistic. But you get the jist of it. 

[jerryskids 6,852]

1 hour ago, MDC said:

Trump’s messaging was great! If only his policies weren’t the same GOP boilerplate we’ve seen for decades: tax cuts, deregulation, anti-labor etc.  

He was funny though.

So you don't like the GOP formula, duly noted.  Doesn't make it wrong.

Presidents are elected for pretty obvious reasons, I'll boil down some recent ones for you:

Bush in 2004:  We were at war, Kerry was a wuss

Obama:  Hopey changey and hip, McCain was old

Trump:  the anti-politician

Biden:  the anti-Trump

[Strike 5,597]

1 hour ago, MDC said:

Trump’s messaging was great! If only his policies weren’t the same GOP boilerplate we’ve seen for decades: tax cuts, deregulation, anti-labor etc.  

He was funny though.

Trump did a lot more than GOP boilerplate stuff.   Keep spouting talking points though.  You're a good soldier. 

[Utilit99 4,099]

5 minutes ago, Strike said:

Trump did a lot more than GOP boilerplate stuff.   Keep spouting talking points though.  You're a good soldier. 

mdcack keeps doubling down on his dumbassery and continues to lose.

[MDC 7,509]

45 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

So you don't like the GOP formula, duly noted.  Doesn't make it wrong.

Presidents are elected for pretty obvious reasons, I'll boil down some recent ones for you:

Bush in 2004:  We were at war, Kerry was a wuss

Obama:  Hopey changey and hip, McCain was old

Trump:  the anti-politician

Biden:  the anti-Trump

I’m point isn’t that GOP boilerplate is bad. That’s a given. My point is that Trump is a charlatan. He’s Mitt Romney with a Twitter handle, only a far bigger ass hole.

[TimmySmith 2,782]

1 hour ago, lod001 said:

Simply a clueless, brainless complete idiot.

 

You don't get it.  This guy is on his last legs.  The mask isn't for covid, it's for anything.  They can't get rid of masks until he either dies or leaves office because he'll look like a fool if he is the only one wearing one.

[jerryskids 6,852]

15 minutes ago, MDC said:

I’m point isn’t that GOP boilerplate is bad. That’s a given. My point is that Trump is a charlatan. He’s Mitt Romney with a Twitter handle, only a far bigger ass hole.

See, I'm amazed that somebody can be so wrong about a person like Romney.  Say what you want about his politics; far righters will call him a RINO and I'm not arguing that.  But he is absolutely a deeply moral person who would take a bullet for you.  Perhaps I'm more attuned to the Mormon culture because they are so prevalent here (second only to Utah) and I've counted several as good friends.  Romney made all the money he needed from Bain, then decided to go into public service, as governor, as POTUS candidate, and now as senator.  

His downfall during the POTUS election IMO was trying to be farther right than he really is.  Then again, the MSM was intent on finding something to bring him down and protect the legacy of Saint Barack.  He had a folder of women, the horror!!!  Yet Biden just announced that he picked his favorite negress for SCOTUS, and you lefties lap it up.

[JustinCharge 2,397]

15 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

See, I'm amazed that somebody can be so wrong about a person like Romney.  Say what you want about his politics; far righters will call him a RINO and I'm not arguing that.  But he is absolutely a deeply moral person who would take a bullet for you.  Perhaps I'm more attuned to the Mormon culture because they are so prevalent here (second only to Utah) and I've counted several as good friends.  Romney made all the money he needed from Bain, then decided to go into public service, as governor, as POTUS candidate, and now as senator.  

His downfall during the POTUS election IMO was trying to be farther right than he really is.  Then again, the MSM was intent on finding something to bring him down and protect the legacy of Saint Barack.  He had a folder of women, the horror!!!  Yet Biden just announced that he picked his favorite negress for SCOTUS, and you lefties lap it up.

youre wrong about Romney.  Romney won the Utah senate seat in 2018, then immediately moved left.  His approval ratings have been poor.  He will probably get primaried and run out of office in 2024.  However, he will be 76 in 2024 and probably will decline to run.  Romney is effectively a lame duck senator in his final term.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,517]

18 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

See, I'm amazed that somebody can be so wrong about a person like Romney.  Say what you want about his politics; far righters will call him a RINO and I'm not arguing that.  But he is absolutely a deeply moral person who would take a bullet for you.  Perhaps I'm more attuned to the Mormon culture because they are so prevalent here (second only to Utah) and I've counted several as good friends.  Romney made all the money he needed from Bain, then decided to go into public service, as governor, as POTUS candidate, and now as senator.  

His downfall during the POTUS election IMO was trying to be farther right than he really is.  Then again, the MSM was intent on finding something to bring him down and protect the legacy of Saint Barack.  He had a folder of women, the horror!!!  Yet Biden just announced that he picked his favorite negress for SCOTUS, and you lefties lap it up.

He’s a vulture capitalist.  Builds nothing, just takes. Not a good guy. He’s a polite guy.  

[Masshole 642]

52 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

See, I'm amazed that somebody can be so wrong about a person like Romney.  Say what you want about his politics; far righters will call him a RINO and I'm not arguing that.  But he is absolutely a deeply moral person who would take a bullet for you.  Perhaps I'm more attuned to the Mormon culture because they are so prevalent here (second only to Utah) and I've counted several as good friends.  Romney made all the money he needed from Bain, then decided to go into public service, as governor, as POTUS candidate, and now as senator.  

His downfall during the POTUS election IMO was trying to be farther right than he really is.  Then again, the MSM was intent on finding something to bring him down and protect the legacy of Saint Barack.  He had a folder of women, the horror!!!  Yet Biden just announced that he picked his favorite negress for SCOTUS, and you lefties lap it up.

Gotta disagree with you on that one.  He was my governor for several years   You actually touched on why he lost the POTUS election in your first paragraph.    He is too nice of guy for how POTUS elections are done now.     Romney never really fought back.    He got slandered by Harry Reid that he didn't pay any taxes.   He never defended his "48% of people rely on govt" comment and got trashed for it.    He got trashed for his "binders full of women" comment even though his admin in MA had more female staff members than any other MA governor in history.    Etc. Etc. Etc.   That's why he lost.    I don't remember thinking "wow, Romney the POTUS candidate is a lot further right than I remember him as governor".   

He is a reason why Trump arrived and won in the following election.    The dems had slandered and smeared both Romney and McCain in the previous two elections and it cost both of them those elections.  Neither one of them really fought back and by the time 2016 came around - many right leaning people, like myself, were sick of seeing "nice" people get trashed and lose.   When someone calls you a "racist" without just cause - you SHOULD BE ANGRY.    When someone calls you a "misogynist" without just cause, you should want to punch that person in the face.   Enough with being nice and turning the other cheek.   And then Trump showed up. . .     

 

[jerryskids 6,852]

Seems I struck a nerve, let me address the replies:

2 hours ago, JustinCharge said:

youre wrong about Romney.  Romney won the Utah senate seat in 2018, then immediately moved left.  His approval ratings have been poor.  He will probably get primaried and run out of office in 2024.  However, he will be 76 in 2024 and probably will decline to run.  Romney is effectively a lame duck senator in his final term.

This has nothing to do with what I posted, but thanks!

1 hour ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

He’s a vulture capitalist.  Builds nothing, just takes. Not a good guy. He’s a polite guy.  

And cops hate blacks and murder them.  See what I did there?  

1 hour ago, Masshole said:

Gotta disagree with you on that one.  He was my governor for several years   You actually touched on why he lost the POTUS election in your first paragraph.    He is too nice of guy for how POTUS elections are done now.     Romney never really fought back.    He got slandered by Harry Reid that he didn't pay any taxes.   He never defended his "48% of people rely on govt" comment and got trashed for it.    He got trashed for his "binders full of women" comment even though his admin in MA had more female staff members than any other MA governor in history.    Etc. Etc. Etc.   That's why he lost.    I don't remember thinking "wow, Romney the POTUS candidate is a lot further right than I remember him as governor".   

He is a reason why Trump arrived and won in the following election.    The dems had slandered and smeared both Romney and McCain in the previous two elections and it cost both of them those elections.  Neither one of them really fought back and by the time 2016 came around - many right leaning people, like myself, were sick of seeing "nice" people get trashed and lose.   When someone calls you a "racist" without just cause - you SHOULD BE ANGRY.    When someone calls you a "misogynist" without just cause, you should want to punch that person in the face.   Enough with being nice and turning the other cheek.   And then Trump showed up. . .     

 

This is the most cogent reply, but after saying you disagree with me you spent the rest of this post seemingly agreeing with me and providing supporting data.   

[Hardcore troubadour 15,517]

3 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Seems I struck a nerve, let me address the replies:

This has nothing to do with what I posted, but thanks!

And cops hate blacks and murder them.  See what I did there?  

This is the most cogent reply, but after saying you disagree with me you spent the rest of this post seemingly agreeing with me and providing supporting data.   

 The cops that hate blacks and murder them are bad guys. The ones that don’t aren’t.  The vulture capitalists like Romney are bad guys. Venture capitalists aren’t. See what I did? 

[Masshole 642]

27 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

This is the most cogent reply, but after saying you disagree with me you spent the rest of this post seemingly agreeing with me and providing supporting data.   

No, I obviously agree Romney is a "nice" guy and an honorable man.   I disagreed with the reason you stated for why he lost the POTUS election.   

[Cdub100 3,935]

I never see people wearing build back better shirts or hats. Weird.

[jerryskids 6,852]

46 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

 The cops that hate blacks and murder them are bad guys. The ones that don’t aren’t.  The vulture capitalists like Romney are bad guys. Venture capitalists aren’t. See what I did? 

Let me try.  I think you are saying that your original "vulture capitalist" comment is not an indictment on all VCs, just Romney.  Care to provide supporting evidence on why he is evil?

[Hardcore troubadour 15,517]

16 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Let me try.  I think you are saying that your original "vulture capitalist" comment is not an indictment on all VCs, just Romney.  Care to provide supporting evidence on why he is evil?

He built nothing. He just bought, sold and destroyed.  Wrecked companies for a few bucks. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,517]

First time since 1963 a nuclear war is seriously being discussed. This is not going well. 

[DonS 3,292]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

First time since 1963 a nuclear war is seriously being discussed. This is not going well. 

The 60s called.  They want their nuclear war fears back. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,517]

5 minutes ago, DonS said:

The 60s called.  They want their nuclear war fears back. 

I don’t even have a wooden desk to hide under. 

[Masshole 642]

On 2/6/2022 at 8:30 PM, Sean Mooney said:

The president doesn't really have an effect on that. You tried this already and it got shot down. 

So the board "centrists", who have claimed that the price of oil is solely based on supply and demand and that the president of the US doesn't have any effect on it.  The price of crude is now over $100/barrel.    Are Russian tanks using that much oil that the price per barrel is up by over $10/barrel just in the last 24 hrs?    Or do oil purchasers, suppliers, and speculators adjust pricing base on their expectations?    And if you acknowledge that the expectations/fears of the international situation have significantly influenced the price of oil - how can you then say that a new administration of the largest economy in the world signaling its intentions to the world about what it will do with exploration, production, and future of oil has no impact on the price of oil?     Sorry - you can't have it both ways.    

https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/future/crude oil - electronic

 

[Sean Mooney 1,984]

41 minutes ago, Masshole said:

So the board "centrists", who have claimed that the price of oil is solely based on supply and demand and that the president of the US doesn't have any effect on it.  The price of crude is now over $100/barrel.    Are Russian tanks using that much oil that the price per barrel is up by over $10/barrel just in the last 24 hrs?    Or do oil purchasers, suppliers, and speculators adjust pricing base on their expectations?    And if you acknowledge that the expectations/fears of the international situation have significantly influenced the price of oil - how can you then say that a new administration of the largest economy in the world signaling its intentions to the world about what it will do with exploration, production, and future of oil has no impact on the price of oil?     Sorry - you can't have it both ways.    

https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/future/crude oil - electronic

 

Another swing and a miss from you

[Utilit99 4,099]

24 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

Another swing and a miss from you

And you strike out again. Keep trying though peanut. 

[JustinCharge 2,397]

let's set rusty off!

Donald Trump is running away with the most favorable national political figure and its just getting stronger.  Overall he is 46% approve to 47% disapprove.  A whopping 28% see Trump as very favorable. There is a stunning 10 point gap between him and second place, and most are in the single digits on that question.  

 

https://mcusercontent.com/ca678077bc522bd7bd74bacbf/files/a7e91458-499d-d0b4-70c5-192fa4bba67f/HHP_Feb_2022_Final_Deck_002_.pdf

 

rusty can go cry in the closet now.  

[avoiding injuries 1,595]

 

[Kopy 572]

8 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

I don’t even have a wooden desk to hide under. 

Make sure you social distance in your bunker

 

[nobody 2,694]

An effective leader would convince OPEC to raise production.

[Cdub100 3,935]

7 minutes ago, nobody said:

An effective leader would convince OPEC to raise production.

An effective leader wouldn't have sh1t all over being energy independent and then fock it all up in the first place.