Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Blue Horseshoe

SF Mayor London Breed (D) Wants To Pay Career Criminals $300/Month NOT To Shoot Other People

Recommended Posts

 

San Francisco will pay criminals $300 a month NOT to shoot other people in desperate plan to tackle surging gun crime

The effort will select 10 fellows to be rewarded with $300 each month to keep their noses clean and keep free from gun violence incidents....Davis tried to explain that the program isn’t “as cut and dry” as simply giving cash for criminals...It's not as transactional as, 'Here's a few dollars so that you don't do something bad,' but it really is about how you help us improve public safety in the neighborhood," she added....The same participants can also seek to receive an additional $200 per month by attending school or helping to be change agents and mediate potentially violent situations before they erupt...."

https://www.the-sun.com/news/3584427/san-francisco-pay-criminals-300-month-shoot-gun-crime/

 

San Francisco will pay people to not shoot others: 'Cash for criminals'

.....San Francisco is rolling out a pilot program that will pay high-risk individuals to not shoot anyone as gun crimes tick up in the city. ....The Dream Keeper Fellowship will pay 10 individuals who are at high risk of being on either end of a shooting $300 each month to not be involved in such crimes..... is funded through the Dream Keeper Initiative, which is San Francisco’s program that works to redirect funding into the Black community. It will launch in October..... Participants are also eligible to receive an additional $200 per month through ways such as, working, going to school or being a mediator in potentially violent situations....

....Mayor London Breed previously spoke approvingly of the idea as one that could cut down on violence in the city..... "We can’t just put them in a program without making sure that they have money, without making sure that they have something to take care of themselves....."

......Critics of the program have pointed out that similar initiatives haven't been very successful....."It was also tried in Sacramento, where its promoters boast that ‘only’ 44% of participants were subsequently arrested on new charges — well, as long as you don't count about one-third of the participants who dropped out or were arrested in its first six months...Violent criminals need jail. They do not need cash. People who shoot other people need to be walled off in prisons and kept away from the rest of us...."

....The move comes as California also works to become the first state to pay drug addicts a few hundred dollars to stay sober. ...Gov. Gavin Newsom asked the federal government last week for permission to use tax dollars to pay for the program through Medicaid. Meanwhile, a similar proposal is also working through California's Legislature, with the state Senate already passing the bill....

https://www.foxnews.com/us/san-francisco-pay-people-not-shoot-gun-crimes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Only way that could even come close to working is if they paid every American the same amount.  Once a crime is committed, it's gone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

What's next?  Free room and board?  Comped meals?  :lol:

Yes. A prison sentence would be nice

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am fine for paying them, but not for not killing.  I am fine for paying them for killing folks on the payment eligible list.  I would approve of double payments if they kill themselves.

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ssshh.... I have to keep my killing on the down-low. 

Prison doesn't scare me, they'll just let me go again, but I could use that extra $300/month.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trump and the MAGA republicans are the real problem. Focus people, focus.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

Hold on.  Are we now saying that it’s the person and not the gun?

It's only the gun when it looks scary.  :nono:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

Hold on.  Are we now saying that it’s the person and not the gun?

Same people that act as if some sperm escapes a peniis and crawls into a vag all by itself and viola! Pregnant.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why would he pay the criminals?  That makes no sense.  I'm told by board leftists that it's the guns fault.  The mayor should be paying the guns.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems way too small.  They are already going to be millionaire's from all their reparations they will be getting from California.  Is $300 really incentive enough?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Man, a free $300?  DO I just get it? Even though I dont shoot people, or do I first have to shoot someone?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Le Marais Bakery owner calls for city officials to 'do more' after burglary

....The owner of Le Marais Bakery is asking city officials to “do more” after his business was ransacked on Monday..... was targeted this week, but it’s the second time a break-in has occurred at the business this month, according to KPIX. Patrick Ascaso, owner of Le Marais Bakery, directed his frustration toward Mayor London Breed, Governor Gavin Newsom and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi on Instagram for not protecting local small businesses in San Francisco.....“They took everything from our Castro café last night, even our industrial safe from the basement,” .... San Francisco Police Department, told Hoodline that SFPD responded to the burglary at around 8:08 a.m. on Monday. When SFPD met with an employee on-site, they discovered that the glass front door had been smashed and several objects were missing. Burglars took off with iPads, staff presents and the basement safe, which was bolted to the floor....

https://www.sfgate.com/food/article/sf-le-marais-bakery-burglarized-17681954.php

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I heard Andrew Yang talk about this on a podcast. We spend an absurd amount of $ on prisons. It’s at least worth consideration if it might be cheaper.

  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, MDC said:

We spend an absurd amount of $ on prisons. It’s at least worth consideration if it might be cheaper.

Bwahahahahahahah

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, MDC said:

I heard Andrew Yang talk about this on a podcast. We spend an absurd amount of $ on prisons. It’s at least worth consideration if it might be cheaper.

Um id be willing my tax dollars go to housing violent criminals instead of paying them to keep walking amongst me and regular people in the community.   Maybe I am crazy.   But hey if they promise!  Was is a pinky promise? If so I am sold.  

You people must be terrible with kids.  Hey please stop throwing a fit, ill buy you all thr flavors of ice cream and a new ps5 if you behave for the day!  Please! I am the adult here but please!

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, listen2me 23 said:

Um id be willing my tax dollars go to housing violent criminals instead of paying them to keep walking amongst me and regular people in the community.   Maybe I am crazy.   But hey if they promise!  Was is a pinky promise? If so I am sold.  

You people must be terrible with kids.  Hey please stop throwing a fit, ill buy you all thr flavors of ice cream and a new ps5 if you behave for the day!  Please! I am the adult here but please!

If they break their pinky promise the mayor will have no choice but to invoke the dreaded DOUBLE DOG DARE to keep the criminsls in line.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, MDC said:

I heard Andrew Yang talk about this on a podcast. We spend an absurd amount of $ on prisons. It’s at least worth consideration if it might be cheaper.

Even Timscotch thinks this is a poor trolling effort.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, listen2me 23 said:

Um id be willing my tax dollars go to housing violent criminals instead of paying them to keep walking amongst me and regular people in the community.   

The ones they want to pay to stay out of jail are already out amongst you in the community. :doh: 

I’m not sold on this being a good idea but I think it’s worth considering as an alternative to mass incarceration. Some counties pay tens of millions of dollars to house inmates. Of this is cheaper and reduces recidivism why not consider it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/13/2023 at 12:19 PM, RLLD said:

Man, a free $300?  DO I just get it? Even though I dont shoot people, or do I first have to shoot someone?

You have to identify as someone who might shoot someone.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, MDC said:

The ones they want to pay to stay out of jail are already out amongst you in the community. :doh: 

I’m not sold on this being a good idea but I think it’s worth considering as an alternative to mass incarceration. Some counties pay tens of millions of dollars to house inmates. Of this is cheaper and reduces recidivism why not consider it?

Right.  I am for tougher laws.  Tougher bail.  And if someone does violent things house them.  

Id be for it if there was something in it for me or normal people like me.  If they are taking my money for promises of not acting like an animal then here is the catch.  If you sign and we catch you with a gun.....50 years.  If you assault someone....50 years.  

Your plan is to pay someone for a promise of not being violent?  A deal they can break whenever they find an opportunity? Then what the same soft system?  You are bad at making deals.

I thought many of these poor people were just mentally ill? Throwing 300 dollars at them cures this illness?  Neat.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We have a huge mental illness problem everyone pay attention and get serious!

We have come up with a solution.   Throw 300 dollars at the ill.   Cured!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why is packing jails or having the death penalty for straight up terrible people a bad thing? I don't understand this stance.  Why is there this need to lighten up on crime? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, listen2me 23 said:

Right.  I am for tougher laws.  Tougher bail.  And if someone does violent things house them.  

Id be for it if there was something in it for me or normal people like me.  If they are taking my money for promises of not acting like an animal then here is the catch.  If you sign and we catch you with a gun.....50 years.  If you assault someone....50 years.  

Your plan is to pay someone for a promise of not being violent?  A deal they can break whenever they find an opportunity? Then what the same soft system?  You are bad at making deals.

I thought many of these poor people were just mentally ill? Throwing 300 dollars at them cures this illness?  Neat.  

First of all it’s not my idea. It’s an idea from Andrew Yang and some others out there. I’m not sure I agree with it but I think it’s worth considering especially if someone can do the math to figure out how many people this keeps out of jail and the expense of monthly payments vs. the cost of incarceration.

Our plan right now of having the world’s largest most expensive incarceration rate isn’t going so well so I’m not going to dismiss any outside the box proposals. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wasn't there already a thread on this? I recall a discussion of it and IIRC what is being proposed is not exactly how it is being represented here. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Imagine having a “serious” conversation about this foolishness? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, MDC said:

I heard Andrew Yang talk about this on a podcast. We spend an absurd amount of $ on prisons. It’s at least worth consideration if it might be cheaper.

Just more evidence that Yang is a dope.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

San Francisco Mayor Talks Reparations for Black Residents

....At a Board of Supervisors meeting Tuesday, San Francisco Mayor London Breed answered questions about the city's closely watched reparations proposal for Black residents....Asked by Supervisor Shamann Walton whether she was committed to reparations, Breed first acknowledged members of the city's African American Reparations Advisory Committee for their work in the face of "outlandish behavior" in response to its proposal, which made national headlines.....

...The reparations committee issued a lengthy report earlier this year detailing historical injustices against Black residents and made more than 100 recommendations for forms of restitution. Some of its more ambitious proposals, namely $5 million cash payouts to eligible individuals, sparked media backlash and criticism from the NAACP and other activist groups.....alluding to San Francisco's estimated $780 million two-year deficit....

https://sfstandard.com/politics/watch-san-francisco-mayor-london-breed-talks-reparations-for-black-residents/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

San Francisco reparations task force member touts tax on billionaires to get $5 million per city resident

....Reparations task force member Rev. Amos Brown told The New York Times, "Of all these billionaires in San Francisco, you could establish a reparations fund" to pay millions to Black residents....California is one of multiple states negotiating over economic reparations for Black Americans whose ancestors were victimized by the Atlantic slave trade and its legacy, despite the fact California was designated as a free state when it joined the Union in 1850.... 

...Brown is the vice chair of both the San Francisco African American Reparations Advisory Committee and the president of the San Francisco branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People....."Despite past promises going unfulfilled, he said, he’s ‘very, very cautiously optimistic’ that the city will enact some form of reparations...Of all these billionaires in San Francisco, you could establish a reparations fund...."

https://www.foxnews.com/media/san-francisco-reparations-task-force-member-touts-tax-billionaires-get-5-million-per-city-resident

 


Stanley Tang, 30
Co-founder and head of labs at DoorDash Real-time net worth: $2.7B

Andy Fang, 30
Co-founder and head of consumer engineering at DoorDash Real-time net worth: $2.7B

Apoorva Mehta, 36
Co-founder and executive chairman at Instacart
Net worth: $3.5B

Vlad Tenev, 36
Co-founder and CEO at Robinhood
Real-time net worth: $2.6B

Baiju Bhatt, 38
Co-founder at Robinhood
Real-time net worth: $2.8B

Dustin Moskovitz, 39
Co-founder at Facebook; Co-founder and CEO at Asana
Real-time net worth: $23B

Tony Xu, 39
Co-founder and CEO at DoorDash
Real-time net worth: $3B

Jensen Huang
Net worth: $21.7 billion / Source of wealth: semiconductors, self made

Marijke Mars
Net worth: $9.6 billion  / Source of wealth: candy, pet food

David Geffen
Net worth: $7.7 billion / Source of wealth: movies, record labels

 

********

SF Mayor Breed has actually appeased race hustlers like Amos Brown because she needs his support to win future elections. But what is the net impact of his idea of "taxing billionaires"? 

First, you'd see all these young tech billionaires (see a small sample size above) leaving California in droves. Which also takes away their infusion into the overall tax base. 

Second, many of the billionaires don't have the net worth to pay out their apportioned rate of "reparations" according to Brown's calculations. Should Jensen Huang be financially massacred at higher rate than the Door Dash guys because they can't afford the total bill? Wouldn't that be "inequity"?

Third, this kind of idiotic move would not only be illegal ( imagine a court trying to wrangle with this) but even if it was legal, it would cost the DNC -  the Asian voting block, the Jewish voting block, suburban women voters, the East Indian voting block and make an enemy of Hollywood and the LGBT movement ( Geffen is an openly gay power broker in Hollywood and a long time fundraiser, along with Jeffrey Katzenberg, for Team Blue campaigns and causes) 

But here's where this gets truly stupid. 

If London Breed is entertaining the thought of giving out millions in reparations, then why does she need to pay black street thugs and career criminals 300 bucks a month not to gun each other down, along with tons of innocent civilians as collateral damage, if they are already going to be paid MILLIONS of dollars according to Amos Brown? 

Breed had to approve of Brown being on the "task force"  Everything stupid that he says is only given a platform because she and Gavin Newsom gave him a public stage to say these idiotic things. 

Will the DNC accept the massive voting losses that will have down the ticket impact in New York, California and Illinois? Hawaii would just straight out flip hard Red instantly. And that's just the Asian voters lost. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Michigan Man Who Shot 84-Year-Old Anti-Abortion Woman Sentenced To Community Service

.....A Michigan man who shot an 84-year-old woman campaigning against abortion was sentenced to 100 hours of community service on Tuesday, according to the Associated Press. “This lady comes up to me, knocks on my door, and says she’s from some coalition to save women and babies,” Sharon Harvey said. “She needed me to vote no on Proposal 3.”

....Jacobson was going door-to-door volunteering with Right to Life, a national anti-abortion organization. Harvey’s wife, who is pro-abortion, said she asked Jacobson to leave multiple times, and eventually Jacobson stepped off their front porch....Harvey said he then accidentally shot Jacobson....Jacobson said she believes Harvey shot her intentionally....Right to Life said Jacobson was peaceful and was walking away when she was shot in the back..... Jacobson suffered a shoulder wound and drove herself to a nearby police station. She was treated at a hospital and recovered....

https://www.dailywire.com/news/michigan-man-who-shot-84-year-old-anti-abortion-woman-sentenced-to-community-service

 

*****

Guess Harvey remember that "home" was not in California, and since there would be no 300 dollars and since Michigan is a Blue stronghold, why not shoot a Pro-Lifer in the back. 

Harvey "bet" on getting away with it. And yes, clearly, got away with it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

San Fran Mayor London Breed, city leaders booed out of drug-infested UN Plaza as brick thrown in crowd

....San Francisco Mayor London Breed and the city’s board of supervisors were forced to retreat inside after a meeting they attempted to hold in a notorious open-air drug market was disrupted by jeers, shouting and a woman who hurled a brick into the crowd, according to a report. On Tuesday, city leaders decided to hold the meeting outdoors in United Nations Plaza to highlight problems plaguing the area — including surging fentanyl overdoses — and to discuss potential solutions, KRON4 reported. 

Breed and Supervisor Aaron Peskin took to the podium and proclaimed the city has been tolerating “illegal, out-of-control behavior for far too long.” ....“Many San Franciscans do not feel safe,” Peskin said. “Brazen drug dealing and deteriorating street conditions have exacerbated a humanitarian crisis on our streets.” But less than 10 minutes after the meeting began, it was cut short as the crowd hurled insults at the mayor and supervisors until they just walked away from the podium, according to KRON. At one point, a woman threw a brick into the crowd and nearly struck a child, according to San Francisco police, who had been deployed to the plaza ahead of the meeting....

https://nypost.com/2023/05/24/san-fran-mayor-london-breed-city-leaders-booed-out-of-drug-infested-un-plaza/

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

San Francisco Homeowners Lose $260 Billion In Value

....But residential values have plunged in San Francisco, falling by about 16.7%, compared to a decline of just 3.3% in the rest of the country, a difference of about 13.4 percentage points. San Francisco’s housing stock was valued at nearly $2 trillion by real estate valuation firm Zillow before the price plunge. This additional 13.4 percentage-point drop means that San Franciscans have lost an extra $260 billion more in residential real estate value than it would have had it kept pace with the rest of the country. ...San Francisco’s housing price decline reflects the fact that the city has lost more than 65,000 residents, roughly 7.5% of its population. San Francisco’s population loss has been the largest among all major cities in recent years.

....Departing San Franciscans have on average represented households of very high income. Between 2019 and 2021, San Francisco lost nearly $15 billion of household income, even after accounting for those who moved into the city.....Quality of life and crime have worsened in San Francisco, even in these expensive neighborhoods. Nearly 90 percent of Nob Hill sidewalks and streets were recently found to be soiled with feces. Unacceptable street and sidewalk sanitation, including human feces and used hypodermic needles, have been an issue for San Francisco for years. In 2018, the city created a pooper scooper team, each member of which received annual compensation of about $211,000 that year. Given the inflation that has occurred since that time, scooper compensation may be close to $250,000 per year today. San Francisco spends nearly five times as much on street sanitation than comparable cities, but despite this high level of spending, city streets remain dirty....

....San Francisco’s crime and sanitation issues reflect the city’s tacit acceptance of illegal drug use. San Franciscans are paying an extremely high price for this, and so are drug users. Drug overdose deaths in the city jumped to 200 in the first three months of this year, representing a rate about 3.8 times higher than the national proportion of deaths to population.....

https://www.hoover.org/research/san-francisco-homeowners-lose-260-billion-value

 

*****

Let's see if this makes sense ( or not)

London Breed wants SF home owners, who are taxpayers, in which nearly all are not going around shooting people and committing crimes to vote for her. They lose 260 billion from their sweat, toil and blood to own a home in the vastly expensive Bay Area. But they are being asked to eat that loss while THEIR TAX DOLLARS are being used to give thugs, drug dealers and career criminals, felons no less, a nice tidy 300 dollars a month, to not gun those homeowners down in their neighborhoods, that have now been devalued. Devalued by whom? In part, by those very same career criminals. 

If Breed wants and demands "social justice", then where is the actual "justice" in any of that idiotic bullsh!t.

Point to note, London Breed's base salary is 351K a year. That makes her the HIGHEST PAID MAYOR in the entire country. Again, paid with by the tax dollars of these SF homeowners. 

Breed is being paid more than any other Mayor in the entire nation to further brutalize actual tax payers in her district to pay the thugs and scum that are driving down their actual property value in the first place. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

San Francisco reparations panelist calls straight white men are ‘serial killers’

....A member of San Francisco’s slavery reparations committee blasted straight white men as a “danger to society” — and claimed “white supremacy is ingrained in the DNA” of America.....Nikcole Cunningham, who serves on the California city’s 15-person African American Reparations Advisory Committee, launched the broadside against straight white men in an interview with The Daily Telegraph.....“Straight white men are abusive. Straight white men are serial killers,” Cunningham told the news outlet. “They have the most — I watch these shows — the most serial killers. Straight white men are the ones who are shooting up schools, right?....“So they are a danger to society,” she said.....

.....She slammed white men for not backing reparations.....“They’re not doing that. So if anything, they pose more of a harm than support and help. And then you got to remember their ancestors … are the ones who were standing out here in their Sunday best watching black people hang and burn,” Cunningham told the outlet.....Cunningham, who was reportedly appointed to the committee because she is suing the city, her former employer, for discrimination.....She is alleging that she was targeted because she is disabled, according to the outlet.....

.....Under its eligibility requirements for the money, residents must be over 18, identify as black for at least 10 years and meet at least two of eight tests, including being descended from slaves or having been “incarcerated by the failed War on Drugs....”

https://nypost.com/2023/07/04/calif-reparations-panelist-says-straight-white-men-are-danger-to-society/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×