Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Giants Fan

No talent ass clowns - musicians that don't deserve fame

Recommended Posts

U2

 

For some reason, I just can not stand these focks. The Police and STING or whatever the fock his name is too. Those guys focking BLOW.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

KISS for sure. They put makeup on and played bad music. Twisted sister did it better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree with everything here except Sting. Abba and Gwen Stefani are ok. Especially agree with Rap sucking worse than any music ever created. My farts sound better than rap.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gonna be really hard to beat Kiss.

Kiss is losing 4-3 as I cast another vote for ©rap.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems a few people don't understand the difference between "No-talent" and just not liking something. Taken as a whole, it's tough to beat Kiss in a no-talent, so I'll vote for them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

American culture places a premium on having no talent, or at least having very superficial talent, like being able to mimic other artists. Look at shows like American Idol and The Voice. <_<

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't really like Kiss, but they are not untalented. They're just overrated. And U2....wow. I mean, say what you want about Bono and his causes and over the top delivery, but The Edge is a great guitarrist.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

U2

 

For some reason, I just can not stand these focks. The Police and STING or whatever the fock his name is too. Those guys focking BLOW.

 

It isn't a lack of talent that is the reason you don't like them.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Janet Jackson

Brittany Spears

 

KISS definitely sucked, but they did write all those crappy songs and play those three chords on their own instruments.

 

Janet and Brittany can't sing or play an instrument.

 

Their formula is dress like a stripper, do a little dance, sing at slightly lower decibels than their backup singers and throw in a few whispers and grunts.

 

Bada Bing. Instant stardom.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

It isn't a lack of talent that is the reason you don't like them.

Agreed.

 

I haven't liked much of what they've done in the last 10 years, but they're a fairly talented group.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

U2's early stuff is great. Joshua Tree is a focking outstanding album. Their more recent stuff....meh. I would vote Kiss.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

American culture places a premium on having no talent, or at least having very superficial talent, like being able to mimic other artists. Look at shows like American Idol and The Voice. <_<

Is having a great singing voice a talent? I say it is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Boy Bands

Pop Queens

Hair Metal Bands

Rappers

Country dudes who wrap themselves in the flag to sell CDs to hillbillies

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is having a great singing voice a talent? I say it is.

Of course it is. And using it to simulate other singers to win a contest is superficial

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course it is. And using it to simulate other singers to win a contest is superficial

But the thread is about people without talent. There is a ton of talented singers on American Idol. The structure of the show lends to them doing cover versions (or, as you call them, impersonations) of songs. Many of them (Kelly Clarkson, Phil Phillips, Daughtry, etc) turn out to be talented songwriters. And can play guitar or other instruments. Like someone said earlier, people are confusing having no talent with acts they simply don't like.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But the thread is about people without talent.

 

 

Don't forget the a$$clown aspect to this thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My point is that the American Idol doesn't value actual artistic or musical talent, just the aping of celebrities. If it did, it would be a songwriting contest. There was a girl on the Voice a few weeks back who was playing a guitar that wasn't plugged in. It's a farce. And sure Daughtry went on to succeed, but he didn't win the contest writing his own songs, because you can't sell Doritos and Bud Light with that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My point is that the American Idol doesn't value actual artistic or musical talent, just the aping of celebrities. If it did, it would be a songwriting contest. There was a girl on the Voice a few weeks back who was playing a guitar that wasn't plugged in. It's a farce. And sure Daughtry went on to succeed, but he didn't win the contest writing his own songs, because you can't sell Doritos and Bud Light with that.

That's because it's a singing contest, not a songwriting contest. Singing, on its own merit, is a talent. But, like I said, many of them have songwriting and instrumental abilities, too. Just this past season, Alex Preston and Jena were both musicians and songwriters. And they were 2 of the top 3. There's plenty of talent on AI. Things are just much different now. Record labels don't send talent scouts to the local dive bars to sign the next radio star. There are outlets for these folks to show themselves off to millions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Hair Metal Bands

 

 

:doh: <_< :nono:

 

Some of the most talented on every instrument were in Hair Metal bands, you faggit

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

:doh: <_< :nono:

 

Some of the most talented on every instrument were in Hair Metal bands, you faggit

speed does not equal talent, especially on the guitar. Dumbo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

speed does not equal talent, especially on the guitar. Dumbo

You don't know dik about guitars and what "talent" means. GTFO of this thread, tubby

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't know dik about guitars and what "talent" means. GTFO of this thread, tubby

ok who's a better guitarist clapton if eddy van halen

 

 

 

 

 

This should be funny

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ok who's a better guitarist clapton if eddy van halen

 

 

 

 

 

This should be funny

 

With different styles it can be difficult to say. I think Eddie may have better technical ability when he's sober, but Clapton is definitely better at evoking emotion with his style and musical ability. I'd give a slight edge to Clapton for that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure if they qualify because I guess technically, they're not musicians. But they're famous no talent ass clowns....Milli Vanilli. :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×