Mike Honcho 4,045 Posted September 26, 2018 Sure did. Hancho thinks that's totally normal. Cdubb thinks things he reads on 4chan/twitter should be taken as facts... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 4,567 Posted September 26, 2018 I have not read a single article on kavanaugh. Nor have I watched any news on him. I do not have enough information to form an opinion. Carry on. By chance, did your fishing boat get blown out to Gilligan's Island by Hurricane Florence? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 3,999 Posted September 26, 2018 I don't think she has stated she was drunk, but had only one beer. A writer at Slate posits a theory that's worth a read...I would suggest 90% of the people in this thread skip it though. The problem with this "theory" is it assumes all these encounters actually happened. I can't believe anyone would take Ramirez's account seriously. This chick admits her memory is foggy and she only remembered the incident after 6 days of conferring with her attorneys. Anyone who would believe it's even slightly likely to be true clearly has an agenda. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
posty 2,296 Posted September 26, 2018 It is so awesome when the left becomes this unhinged... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 2,545 Posted September 26, 2018 Cdubb thinks things he reads on 4chan/twitter should be taken as facts... Says the guy who uses Slate as a "credible" source. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,649 Posted September 26, 2018 I have literally had enough of this . Now some other broads coming out? Why do they all crawl out of the woodwork at the last minute? Do the benefit of Judge for a long freaking time. Gee, I'm sure the television has nothing to do with it. Which one of them lands a contract with Dancing with the Stars first? Wake me when it's over. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iam90sbaby 2,129 Posted September 26, 2018 I don't think she has stated she was drunk, but had only one beer. A writer at Slate posits a theory that's worth a read...I would suggest 90% of the people in this thread skip it though. Do a little research on The Slate Group and get back with us bud. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KSB2424 3,085 Posted September 26, 2018 I have literally had enough of this ######. Now some other broads coming out? Why do they all crawl out of the woodwork at the last minute? Do the benefit of Judge for a long freaking time. Gee, I'm sure the television has nothing to do with it. Which one of them lands a contract with Dancing with the Stars first? Wake me when it's over. This is where Im at. Wake me up next week. Scrubbed social media Porn star attorneys Gang Bangs All at the last minute. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,390 Posted September 26, 2018 I keep saying this but... this story just doesn't fly. One, why was she drunk in a room with two guys? Two, she wasn't escaping if they wanted to rape her. The likely scenario is she went in with them to mess around, something went amiss, she decided to bail, they let her go. More likely Kavanaugh decided he didn't want a turn with the school slut and THAT is what pissed her off. I still contend it's all made up bullshit Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HellToupee 749 Posted September 26, 2018 She sucked 37 d!cks?!!?Back then in HS/college it was much easier to get laid than a BJ. Believe me I was there. Bill Clinton really unlocked the BJ to be meanstream hip . Ill never speak bad about him for that. At least in my area of MA Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 3,455 Posted September 26, 2018 She sucked 37 d!cks?!!? Not all at once.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SenatorRock 708 Posted September 26, 2018 They should over turn Roe v Wade and uphold National Voter ID on day 1 after Kav is seated, just to rustle the jimmies of these domestic terrorists. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 2,545 Posted September 26, 2018 Kavanaugh calls newest claim absolutely ridiculous and says this is from the "Twilight Zone" https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/26/jockeying-over-evidence-kavanaugh-hearing-842711 I agree. The Democrats and left are absolutely despicable. At this point, I might even support a purge of liberals and send them to one of their Socialist Utopia's like Venezuela or Cuba. They can have 'em. Maybe a little dose of reality will knock some sense into them. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HellToupee 749 Posted September 26, 2018 Kavanaugh calls newest claim absolutely ridiculous and says this is from the "Twilight Zone" https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/26/jockeying-over-evidence-kavanaugh-hearing-842711 I agree. The Democrats and left are absolutely despicable. At this point, I might even support a purge of liberals and send them to one of their Socialist Utopia's like Venezuela or Cuba. They can have 'em. Maybe a little does of reality will knock some sense into them. Its the dems version of pizzagate Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted September 26, 2018 Kavanaugh calls newest claim absolutely ridiculous and says this is from the "Twilight Zone" https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/26/jockeying-over-evidence-kavanaugh-hearing-842711 I agree. The Democrats and left are absolutely despicable. At this point, I might even support a purge of liberals and send them to one of their Socialist Utopia's like Venezuela or Cuba. They can have 'em. Maybe a little does of reality will knock some sense into them. lowest of the low Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SUXBNME 1,343 Posted September 26, 2018 In a row? Got Steel Panther beat Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 2,545 Posted September 26, 2018 Slate? Are you fockin kidding me? Grow up Odds on Honcho using Vox as his next source? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
joneo 529 Posted September 26, 2018 http://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=294823064449251&id=114364638621903 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vuduchile 1,941 Posted September 26, 2018 Back then in HS/college it was much easier to get laid than a BJ. Believe me I was there. Bill Clinton really unlocked the BJ to be meanstream hip . Ill never speak bad about him for that. At least in my area of MA Yep. The pendulum definitely swung the other way after I left HS. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 4,045 Posted September 26, 2018 The problem with this "theory" is it assumes all these encounters actually happened. I can't believe anyone would take Ramirez's account seriously. This chick admits her memory is foggy and she only remembered the incident after 6 days of conferring with her attorneys. Anyone who would believe it's even slightly likely to be true clearly has an agenda. At odds with that though are multiple classmates of Ramirez apparently were talking about this incident months ago. Obviously Heresay, but compelling when taken independently. Rolling Stone The fact that people were talking about the incident after it happened is one of the tentpoles of the claim’s credibility. The New Yorker cites multiple students who detail hearing about it second-hand, several of which were able to corroborate the account independently of Ramirez. “We found classmates had been talking about this for weeks,” Mayer said Monday on CBS. “There’d been an email chain of Yale classmates of Kavanaugh talking about ‘will this thing come out’ long before Christine Blasey Ford came forward. We felt the public ought to know about this.” Ronan Farrow, the report’s co-author, took care of the second part of Kavanaugh’s defense, that those he knew at the time say “it’s inconceivable that I could have done such a thing.” James Roche, a software industry CEO who was Kavanaugh’s roommate at the time, released a statement on Monday to supplement the New Yorker‘s reporting. In it, he wrote about how Kavanaugh was “a notably heavy drinker, even by the standards of the time, and that he became aggressive and belligerent when he was very drunk.” He went on to note that he became friends with Ramirez and trusts her account. “Based on my time with Debbie, I believe her to be unusually honest and straightforward and I cannot imagine her making this up,” he wrote, adding that he believed “[Kavanaugh] and his social circle were capable of the actions Debbie described.” Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 3,999 Posted September 26, 2018 At odds with that though are multiple classmates of Ramirez apparently were talking about this incident months ago. Obviously Heresay, but compelling when taken independently. You want to hang your hat on this: The New Yorker cites multiple students who detail hearing about it second-hand, several of which were able to corroborate the account independently of Ramirez. Wow. How much credence do you give to the FACT that every person the first two accusers have specifically named as having been there don't even remember the incidents in question? That seems pretty damning IMO. If I say, "these people can attest to this" and they say "uh, I don't remember that ever happening", it should reflect on my credibility, don't you think? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HellToupee 749 Posted September 26, 2018 Somewhere Long Dong Silver is laughing Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,649 Posted September 26, 2018 The question I can't get out of my head is, if you honestly believed that this guy was such a sexual predator, why did you wait this long? Oh sure, he's a man and a very powerful position with a lifetime job to boot, but I'm sure he's not a threat to anybody else! And then one day before the vote? Oh go yourself. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Drizzay 647 Posted September 26, 2018 is this still a thing? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 4,045 Posted September 26, 2018 You want to hang your hat on this: Wow. How much credence do you give to the FACT that every person the first two accusers have specifically named as having been there don't even remember the incidents in question? That seems pretty damning IMO. If I say, "these people can attest to this" and they say "uh, I don't remember that ever happening", it should reflect on my credibility, don't you think? I haven't hung my hat anywhere. Just countering 'she was drunk and can't remember' with other people who were on campus at the time remember hearing that story. That's not exactly nothing. I do give credence to that fact, but I also weigh it against self-preservation. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 4,045 Posted September 26, 2018 The question I can't get out of my head is, if you honestly believed that this guy was such a sexual predator, why did you wait this long? Oh sure, he's a man and a very powerful position with a lifetime job to boot, but I'm sure he's not a threat to anybody else! And then one day before the vote? Oh go ###### yourself. Why did those Sandusky kids wait so long??? That's not an argument...heck Maryland doesn't even have a statute of limitations on sex crimes for the exact reason that many victims don't come forward right away. ETA: The most recent allegations(Julie Swetnick) made in Maryland are could start a police investigation Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5-Points 2,739 Posted September 26, 2018 Did you see when they interviewed him recently and asked him about it? His response Well Obama won right didnt care if it was true or not; just that Obama won.Doesn't surprise me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 2,545 Posted September 26, 2018 Why did those Sandusky kids wait so long??? That's not an argument...heck Maryland doesn't even have a statute of limitations on sex crimes for the exact reason that many victims don't come forward right away. ETA: The most recent allegations(Julie Swetnick) made in Maryland are could start a police investigation Except that she doesn't accuse Kavanaug of raping her at all. What's next? kavanaugh's guilty because he was in the same City or State as the crime? Pa-f@cking-thetic. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted September 26, 2018 Multiple allegations from people asking the FBI to investigate. Those arent the actions of people lying. Multiple people with a lot to lose of they testify and are lying. Yet all of you think they are liars. And wish it all would end and just confirm without ever investigating at all. So utterly ridiculous. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 2,545 Posted September 26, 2018 Uh-Oh. Bot must be on full tilt. I see the posts (This post is hidden because you have chosen to ignore posts by Sho Nuff. View it anyway?) are coming fast and furious. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 5,902 Posted September 26, 2018 Uh-Oh. Bot must be on full tilt. I see the posts (This post is hidden because you have chosen to ignore posts by Sho Nuff. View it anyway?) are coming fast and furious. Why ignore him if youre going to constantly talk about him anyway? Clearly youre obsessed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 2,545 Posted September 26, 2018 Why ignore him if youre going to constantly talk about him anyway? Clearly youre obsessed. Just like you're obsessed with me, iCreeperTM. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 719 Posted September 26, 2018 He ignores me..yet... And apparently 2 whole posts are fast and furious. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,716 Posted September 26, 2018 Just like you're obsessed with me, iCreeperTM. Pow! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,390 Posted September 26, 2018 Why did those Sandusky kids wait so long??? That's not an argument...heck Maryland doesn't even have a statute of limitations on sex crimes for the exact reason that many victims don't come forward right away. ETA: The most recent allegations(Julie Swetnick) made in Maryland are could start a police investigation The case is so similar too. Well except she's the only one who says it happened. Nobody she says who can collaborate her story has done as much. Also he didn't rape her. Also the kids did tell but the community silenced it. So yeah come to think about it your analogy is as full of sh1t as Ford is. You are awarded zero points. Go back to FBG where the soybois believe this garbage 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 4,045 Posted September 26, 2018 The question I can't get out of my head is, if you honestly believed that this guy was such a sexual predator, why did you wait this long? Oh sure, he's a man and a very powerful position with a lifetime job to boot, but I'm sure he's not a threat to anybody else! And then one day before the vote? Oh go ###### yourself. Why did those Sandusky kids wait so long??? That's not an argument...heck Maryland doesn't even have a statute of limitations on sex crimes for the exact reason that many victims don't come forward right away. ETA: The most recent allegations(Julie Swetnick) made in Maryland are could start a police investigation You might want to look at the context of a statement before replying. I didn't compare the cases, I was merely pointing out that not all victims come forward right away. The case is so similar too. Well except she's the only one who says it happened. Nobody she says who can collaborate her story has done as much. Also he didn't rape her. Also the kids did tell but the community silenced it. So yeah come to think about it your analogy is as full of sh1t as Ford is. You are awarded zero points. Go back to FBG where the soybois believe this garbage You all right man, no need for the hostility. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted September 26, 2018 The case is so similar too. Well except she's the only one who says it happened. Nobody she says who can collaborate her story has done as much. Also he didn't rape her. Also the kids did tell but the community silenced it. So yeah come to think about it your analogy is as full of sh1t as Ford is. You are awarded zero points. Go back to FBG where the soybois believe this garbage for the win Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shorepatrol 1,738 Posted September 26, 2018 ###### you you ###### piece of ###### troll. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
penultimatestraw 473 Posted September 26, 2018 They were invoking the Biden rule, and they could do it because Harry Reid changed the rules to benefit the democrats when they were the majority. We all know Obama quickly blew that. Democrats have themselves to blame about Garland. Plus Obama didn't really put up much of a fight, confident Hillary would win. Why wouldn't he? The FBI told him it was in the bag. Lol. You really need to start reading and watching some news programs.There is no official “Biden rule”. But remind me how many appointees have been blocked by it? Have the Republicans ever changed the appointment rules to benefit their appointees? All the partisan gamesmanship is nonsense. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites