Jump to content
KSB2424

Ahmaud Arbery

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, Utilit99 said:

I already know you think it's funny that some dude is constantly lurking around someone else's home and has been known to be a guy who had illegal firearms and brings them into schools and runs from the cops into populated auditoriums. Etc.

But some people don't. :dunno:

You said he was a bad guy. ROFL. But the murderers are patriots. Lol.  You never fail to entertain

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The good old boys brought a gun to a fistfight. You don’t put a gun on a man who isn’t putting one (or another deadly weapon ) on you. Use of DPF 101. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, The Observer said:

You said he was a bad guy. 

And I was correct again. :thumbsup:

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Gladiators said:

Hopefully all the facts come out and justice is served.

What facts? The relevant facts are all in the video. The men had guns drawn on him, that’s not right. But the killing was justified in that in that moment, he gave them no choice since he attacked the guy with the gun and tried to take it. If they don’t shoot, he grabs the gun and shoots them, fact. Self defense at that point. You could argue Arbery going for the gun was self defense on his part but that’s also dumb and reckless.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, iam90sbaby said:

 

Given this chart, who's more racist in this country, blacks or whites?

Peenie votes that it's whites because she thinks their crimes against blacks are 100% racially motivated, and black crimes against whites are all just simple robbery. Color doesn't matter to them 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Utilit99 said:

Given this chart, who's more racist in this country, blacks or whites?

Peenie votes that it's whites because she thinks their crimes against blacks are 100% racially motivated, and black crimes against whites are all just simple robbery. Color doesn't matter to them 

Wonder why black on black crime is missing from that chart.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Utilit99 said:

Given this chart, who's more racist in this country, blacks or whites?

Peenie votes that it's whites because she thinks their crimes against blacks are 100% racially motivated, and black crimes against whites are all just simple robbery. Color doesn't matter to them 

Please calculate this on a per capita basis so that Newbie can understand.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, MDC said:

Wonder why black on black crime is missing from that chart.

Not enough room? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Casual Observer said:

Please calculate this on a per capita basis so that Newbie can understand.

His would retreat into a safe space.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, iam90sbaby said:

 

The 13% put in some overtime in 2018. Focking animals. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, peenie said:

Because mostly, black on white crime is financially motivated.

Look another race baiter!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, BiffTannen said:

The 13% put in some overtime in 2018. Focking animals. 

If they would only list black on Asian or black on gay/trans crimes. Heads would explode. That’s who is doing the overwhelming majority of crimes against those groups. Especially the trannies

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Gladiators said:

Hopefully all the facts come out and justice is served.

It's already apparent facts and truths don't matter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MDC said:

Wonder why black on black crime is missing from that chart.

LOL. what a moron.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, lod001 said:

LOL. what a moron.

I’ll give you the answer: black people are most likely to victimize other black people.

No matter who they victimize, it’s racist. :thumbsup: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, tanatastic said:

Also If that guy just lets Arbery take his gun, Arbery 100% shoots him. It was kill or be killed at that point when he decided to fight back and go for his weapon. This is an unusual situation because anyone with a brain and no gun doesn’t try that against someone with a gun.

Ya gotta be able to work that out in your head real fast or instinct takes over. He couldn't think fast enough. Instinct took over in this one and now he's dead instead of jogging today.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, tanatastic said:

He could have put his hands up and talked to the guys or gotten a beating, cops called, whatever. 

Zero chance of that ever happening, in this case or anything like it. Street cred...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, lod001 said:

Ya gotta be able to work that out in your head real fast or instinct takes over. He couldn't think fast enough. Instinct took over in this one and now he's dead instead of jogging today.

And now Joe Bob and Cletus are in jail instead of going to their KKK meeting. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, The Observer said:

And now Joe Bob and Cletus are in jail instead of going to their KKK meeting. 

And now ahmaud is not breathing instead of in prison sucking other dude's cacks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, MDC said:

I’ll give you the answer: black people are most likely to victimize other black people.

No matter who they victimize, it’s racist. :thumbsup: 

Do you really not get why everyone is giving you a hard time on this?  :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Do you really not get why everyone is giving you a hard time on this?  :dunno:

I get it alright. Do you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Charging the guy was stupid but I am surprised how many people act like he had it coming because he was walking around a construction site or possibly panicked and charged a guy that was cutting him off in a truck and had a gun.   He paid for his stupidity with his life and I have no problem with the other two guys paying for theirs.   It should not matter what color any of them was.  It would be the same in reverse or if they were all the same color. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, MDC said:

I get it alright. Do you?

Of course I do, that's why I asked.  :unsure:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Utilit99 said:

Given this chart, who's more racist in this country, blacks or whites?

Peenie votes that it's whites because she thinks their crimes against blacks are 100% racially motivated, and black crimes against whites are all just simple robbery. Color doesn't matter to them 

I don't think 100% white crime against blacks is racially motivated. Don't try to explain my thinking. I just know the people who are committing crimes tend to be poor while the target of the crime tends to have something they want to steal.

Earlier, I was discussing the way the media handles the cases. They tend to report certain cases and not report others. This is why I hate getting in these debates because murders happen everyday but certain murders really get the public riled up. It's about views:

Pretty white girl goes missing 

Cute white child goes missing

Rich white family killed in their home

Black person killed by white person

Black person shoots up a party

Gun store robberies caught on tape

Two women fighting caught on tape

Teacher sex scandal

Jealous ex boyfriend kills ex girlfriend usually Hispanic 

School shootings but only covered if located in upscale neighborhoods 

Grandma missing cause she has Alzheimer's

Police shoots unarmed person of color

Same stories all the time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, TBayXXXVII said:

Everyone has a right to defend themselves.  The thing is, we can't hear the audio.  IF IF IF.... these guys are making a citizen's arrest and they told Arbery that they were making a citizen's arrest, it's important to know what laws/rules apply.

The requirements to make a Citizen's Arrest:

  • Witness the crime take place
    • Apparently they did... they had the video.
  • Have probable cause or reasonable belief that the person committed a crime.
    • They do.  They know that Arbery didn't live there
  • Determine whether the crime is a felony
    • We know the father was involved in law enforcement... he knows that trespassing is a felony.
  • Decide whether its safe to make the arrest
    • I think it was safe.  Arbery was out in the open and didn't appear to have a weapon.
  • Fully understand the circumstances and the responsibility in making the arrest
    • Because the father was in law enforcement, I'd like to the think he knew those responsibilities.

 

To me, the father and son were perfectly within their legal rights to attempt a citizens arrest.  Here's where things get tricky.  If these two were within their rights, and it appears they were, they are allowed to use deadly force if "if the arresting citizen or witnesses are in immediate physical danger by the suspect", (see the link I provided).  Now, each state is different, but we'll see where Georgia stands on that.  So, if these guys were within their rights to make a citizens arrest and Arbery did try to attack them, is he actually "defending himself"?  I think that's where the dispute may come from.  I think he doesn't.  If it's found that the two were well within their rights to make the arrest, I hate it, but I think the two are within their rights to shoot him.  I'm not a lawyer though.  Personally, I think the use of excessive force is the way the prosecution should go and maybe involuntary manslaughter.  At this point, I think that's their only way of getting a conviction.  Legally, I don't think they're guilty of murder, just stupidity.

I like how you break it down here. Somewhere buried in this thread I'd done similar but you have links and actual data.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, peenie said:

 

My fiancé

🤗This is news. I'm happy for you peenie. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, peenie said:

I don't think 100% white crime against blacks is racially motivated. Don't try to explain my thinking. I just know the people who are committing crimes tend to be poor while the target of the crime tends to have something they want to steal.

Earlier, I was discussing the way the media handles the cases. They tend to report certain cases and not report others. This is why I hate getting in these debates because murders happen everyday but certain murders really get the public riled up. It's about views:

Pretty white girl goes missing 

Cute white child goes missing

Rich white family killed in their home

Black person killed by white person

Black person shoots up a party

Gun store robberies caught on tape

Two women fighting caught on tape

Teacher sex scandal

Jealous ex boyfriend kills ex girlfriend usually Hispanic 

School shootings but only covered if located in upscale neighborhoods 

Grandma missing cause she has Alzheimer's

Police shoots unarmed person of color

Same stories all the time.

Putting together a comprehensive list of black-on-white crime is a difficult task for two, superficially contradictory, reasons: 1) There is so much of it. 2) There is so little reporting on it. I doubt there is a day that goes by in the United States without at least dozens of instances of blacks assaulting, robbing, and/or defacing the property of whites. Yet, if all you’re reading is the New York Times, you might guess that crime of that sort takes place half a dozen times a year at most. But, if you start to dig through local news sources, and discover the code words used to discuss black crime (e.g. “youths”), the ocean of write-ups becomes overwhelming. Indeed, American Renaissance has nearly one thousand news items tagged “Black on White Crime,” while Paul Kersey has well over 3,000 blog posts about the matter.

On the evening of February 20, 1990, Robert Simon and Anthony Carr — both black — were burgling Carl Parker’s house in Lambert, in Mississippi’s Quitman County. Mr. Parker, along with three other family members — all white — arrived home to find a pickup truck loaded with loot just about to drive off. The surprised thieves held the Parker family at gun point and tied up Mr. Parker’s 12-year-old half-brother Greg and then shot him in the back. They raped and sodomized his nine-year-old half-sister Charlotte Jo before they killed her. They shot his stepmother, Bobbie Jo in the chest, and they also killed Carl Parker himself. They cut off his ring finger to get his wedding band — whether before or after they killed him is not known. Then they dragged the four bodies into Mr. Parker’s house and burned it down over them. [Allen Breed, Price of Justice Makes Poor County Even Poorer, Detroit News, March 21, 1999, p. 19A. First reported by American Renaissance in July 1999.]

In 1992, six black marines at Camp LeJeune, South Carolina, got drunk in a barracks, worked themselves into a frenzy over “racism,” and decided to do something about it. “We are going to get us a white boy tonight,” Kenneth Parker reportedly said. They went out with a shotgun and found a white marine, Rodney Page, and explained what they intended to do. As Mr. Page begged for his life, they shot him to death in the presence of his pregnant wife. [AP. Marines angry about racism, defendant testifies, Raleigh News & Observer, Feb. 3, 1993. First reported by American Renaissance in June 1993.]

In 1992, 25-year-old black Scott Johnson abducted a 35-year-old white woman and her three-year-old daughter at a shopping mall. He left the child in a rural area, where she wandered along for eight hours. He raped the woman and then killed her, stabbing her 40 times.

 

 

When Johnson was finally brought to justice in 1995, the victim’s husband was disappointed that the killer was not sentenced to death. “Justice is not being served until that animal is dead,” he told the court. Mr. Johnson shot back with “You better stop calling me an animal, motherf*****.” The husband beckoned to Johnson and shouted “Come on,” but bailiffs prevented a fight. At one point, the victim’s sister screamed “Why, why did you have to kill her?” Mr. Johnson smirked. As he was led from the courtroom, members of the victim’s family shouted “Animal, animal, animal.” [Jennifer Havilah, Mockery of Justice, NY Post, May 9, 1995, p. 9. First reported by American Renaissance in July 1995.]

In April, 1993, five Brooklyn “youths” found a white woman jogging alone on the Coney Island boardwalk. They dragged her under the boardwalk, where they took turns raping, sodomizing, punching, and kicking her. The crime, committed against a recent immigrant to the United States, caused a stir at the time. In May of 1995, the “youths” were given plea-bargained sentences that ranged from four-to-ten years to seven-to-21 years. They showed utterly no remorse, and laughed and joked as their lawyers spoke with the judge. One convict’s mother then claimed her son got a harsh sentence because he was black. “When did you ever hear of anyone getting 20 years for rape?” she wanted to know. A father ranted about blacks being persecuted by a white criminal justice system. [Andrea Peyser, Why Coney Island Thugs will laugh all the way to prison, NY Post, 5/9/95, p. 8. First reported by American Renaissance in July 1995.]

In 1993, a jury in Orlando, FL, was the first to return convictions under a new federal law against armed carjacking. The three defendants, all black, faced mandatory life sentences, because they committed murder during the crime: three white men.

The three whites were abducted at gun point along with a black woman who was the girlfriend of one of the whites. They were driven to an isolated field where the whites were made to strip naked and lie face down. Each was then shot in the back of the head. At the trial, the black woman explained that she had been spared because the carjackers did not want to “do a sister.”

Jack Pate, Osceola County sheriff’s commander said that race was not a factor in the crime. [Youth Found Guilty in Fatal Carjacking, Houston Chronicle, 2/26/93. Phil Long, Police: 4 suspects shot men for fear of being identified, Miami Herald, 12/3/92. First reported by American Renaissance in July 1993.]

In 1993, two teen-aged blacks were sitting in a Milwaukee fast-food restaurant wondering whom to rob. They decided on Christine Schweiger because she was white, and they figured that a white woman was less likely to carry a gun than a black. They accosted Miss Schweiger and her ten-year-old daughter on the way to their car and ordered Miss Schweiger onto her knees. She complied, but explained that she had no money. In reply, the blacks blew her brains out with a sawed-off shotgun. [First reported by American Renaissance in February 1994.]

In September of 1994, an 11-year-old black boy in Chicago was arrested for killing an 84-year-old white woman. The boy claimed he hated Anna Gilvis, his next-door neighbor, because she frequently called him “######.” One day he sneaked into Mrs. Gilvis’ home but she beat him with a cane and ordered him to leave. He wrestled the cane away from her and beat her with it as she crawled into the bathroom. He bound her with twine from plants in the living room but since she would not stop screaming, he cut her throat with a kitchen knife. [Scott Fornek, Cop: boy killed out of hate, Chi Sun Times, 9/7/94, p. 3. First reported by American Renaissance in November 1994.] In December of that year, the boy (whose name cannot be released because of his tender years) was convicted of first-degree murder, put on probation, and released to the custody of his grandmother. Although a new law that took effect in January of 1995 would have provided for the boy to be put in a locked juvenile home, his sentencing took place in December of 1994. The judge had only the option of sending him to a mental institution, but experts found the lad entirely sane. [Courtenay Edelhart & Susan Kuczka, His hands tied, judge lets 11-year-old killer go free, Chi Trib, Dec. 9, 1994, p. 1. First reported by American Renaissance in February 1995.]

In September of 1995, Ryan Kieth Moody of Lubbock, Texas received a 99-year sentence for shooting to death a white, 39-year-old stockbroker. According to an FBI affidavit, an acquaintance quoted Mr. Moody as saying that he and a friend were going to drive into the white part of town and kill the first white man they found. They saw Randy Lawson sitting in his car in a well-to-do neighborhood less than a block from his house, and shot him with a rifle. Mr. Lawson’s widow testified that she did not hate the killer and that she would pray for him.

During the trial, Mr. Moody took the stand and testified that he had been having breakfast with his girlfriend at the time of the killing. He was so obviously unconcerned about what had happened to the white man, that the jury took less than an hour to convict him. There were no blacks on the jury, which has resulted in an outcry from the usual quarters. [AP, Man guilty in racial shooting, Sept. 13, 1995. First reported by American Renaissance in July 1995.]

In November 1995, Joseph Harris, a black from Wayne, New Jersey, broke into the home of his former supervisor and, after shooting her boyfriend, stabbed her to death with a samurai sword. He then drove to the post office from which he had been recently fired, and killed two white mail handlers.

 

 

A note written by him and found near the bodies in the post office details his conviction that his employment problems were the result of a secret, white-led war against blacks. He claimed his killings were merely self-defense. He wrote: “Remember that this was a war that they started and I finish and sometimes a few innocent people get killed . . .” By murdering whites, he felt he was not simply obeying his conscience but Fate itself. “It’s like the only reason I was brought in to this world, was to kill this particular group of people.” [Thomas Zambito, Note Hints at Postal Killer’s Mental State, The Record (Bergen, NJ), Nov. 10, 1995. First reported by American Renaissance in April 1996.]

In December, 1994, a 41-year-old black man named Clifford McCree was dismissed from his Fort Lauderdale job as a beach cleaner. After suspending him four times for absenteeism and bad conduct, the city finally fired him from the $27,000-a-year job when he failed a drug test.

In February of 1995, having been fired from another job as a security guard, Mr. McCree went back to his old employer. He found a group of workers having breakfast around a conference table and opened fire, killing his former boss and four former co-workers, before turning his gun on himself. All of Mr. McCree’s victims were white. He would have killed two more co-workers if one had not feigned death and another had not raced out the back door, followed by a hail of bullets.

In his suicide note, he wrote that “the economic lynching without regard or recourse was — is — something very evil . . . I also wanted to punish some of the cowardly, racist devils that help bring this about.” A relative of one victim recalled a conversation with the killer, saying “He said that white people should be dead, white people shouldn’t be able to live.” [Florida Killer Said Victims Were Racists, Police Say, New York Times, Feb. 11, 1996. Freida Frisaro, 5 Shot Dead in Fort Lauderdale, Naples Daily News, Feb. 10, 1996, p. 1A. First reported by American Renaissance in April 1996.]

In April of 1996, black man named Michael Whitener, was sentenced to concurrent 60- and 45-year sentences in Goshen, Indiana for killing one white and attempting to kill another. Mr. Whitener admitted that he had simply killed the first whites who came along. He was angry because earlier that day a white detective in Elkhart, Indiana had shot and killed a black man. [105 Years Imposed in Murder, The Elkhart Truth (Indiana), April 18, 1996. First reported by American Renaissance in July 1996.]

In May of 1996, a black Dayton man shot and killed a white delivery man in an unprovoked attack and then opened fire on a group of white policemen, killing one officer before he was shot and killed. Twenty-four-year-old Maurice Fareed had long had a grudge against whites. As his mother explained to reporters, “The last couple of days he said there wasn’t no hope and white people were going to keep black people in slavery.” [Reuter, Dayton, Ohio, May 24, 1996. First reported by American Renaissance in July 1996.]

In May of 1996, in Sacramento, California, two blacks plead guilty to kidnapping a white woman from an apartment complex, terrorizing her, and forcing her to drive them around town while they looked for people to rob. The men said they had put the woman through the eight-hour ordeal as revenge for 400 years of slavery. [Roland Sweet, News Quirks, Northern Express (Traverse City, MI), May 1, 1996, p. 26. First reported by American Renaissance in July 1996.]

In 1997, a 35-year-old black American, Steve Thomas, was put on trial in Finland for going on a sex spree after learning that he had the AIDS virus. Mr. Thomas, who was married to a Finnish woman with whom he had two children, reportedly had sex with over 100 women over the course of a few years. Dozens of them were infected. Mr. Thomas worked as a doorman at bars and nightclubs, where women are said to have found him appealingly exotic. In 1990, a Helsinki court sentenced a Ugandan man to 11½ years in prison for deliberately infecting women with AIDS. [N.Y. Rapper Accused in HIV Murder-trial in Finland, New York Daily News, April 18, 1997. Devlin Barrett, HIV+ New York Lover on Trial in Finland, New York Post, April 18, 1997, p. 3. First reported by American Renaissance in June 1997.]

In 1997, three white Michigan teenagers who hopped a slow-moving freight train got a surprise when they got off by mistake in a black ghetto. The two boys, aged 14 and 15, and a 14-year-old girl overshot their rural, mostly-white destination of Holly, Michigan, and found themselves in a derelict part of Flint called “the Strip.”

They set off into the dark looking for a pay phone, and were “befriended” by six young blacks who led them to a deserted park. The blacks pistol-whipped and gang-raped the girl while they threatened the boys with a shotgun. Then they forced the three to lie down while one shot the boys in the backs of their heads, execution-style with a .22-caliber pistol, and then shot the girl in the face. They left the whites for dead, after robbing them — of ten dollars.

 

 

One of the boys died, but the other boy and the girl staggered out of the park covered in blood, the girl dressed only in a white T-shirt. They made it to a highway where a black truck driver finally rescued them. He later said he was worried about what two white kids were “doing down here at this time of the night.”

One resident of “the Strip” has a straightforward explanation for what happened: “They would have stuck out like a sore thumb, three white kids in this neighborhood — they’d be sitting ducks.” But a hate crime? Hardly. No dispatches — almost all local — have used the phrase and some news reports have not mentioned race at all. Not one of the six blacks charged with the crime, who range in ages from 16 to 23, had a criminal record. [Brian Murphy, 6 Charged in Attack on Teens, Detroit Free Press, June 24, 1997, p. 1A. Brian Harmon and Ron French, Attack on 3 Teens in Flint Netted $10, Detroit News, June 24, 1997. First reported by American Renaissance in September 1997.]

A white, Roman Catholic teacher in her mid-40s used to commute every day from her pleasant white suburb to one of the most violent slums of Chicago to teach writing in the public schools. On February 8, 1997, a nearly six-foot-tall, 170-pound eighth-grader attacked her in her class with a claw hammer and with no more warning than the words “white .” With one blow he destroyed an eye socket and with another he shattered her cheek bone. He was angry because she had threatened him with suspension for misbehavior.

The teacher now has five metal plates in her head, and her one good eye is held in place with surgical mesh beneath the skin. However, her greatest pain lies in the fact that her assailant had told many other students the night before about his plans, and had repeated his threats the morning of the attack. Some of her own students knew he had brought the hammer to school, but told her nothing. “That’s what hurts,” she says. “A lot of them knew.” After the attack, which left her gushing blood, children from her class scampered out of the room to tell the attacker’s younger brother that the deed had, indeed, been done. Reached by a reporter, the brother said: “She was tricking on him. She deserved it for threatening suspensions.” [John Kass, Violent Kid Ends Teachers Dream — But He Had Help, Chicago Tribune, July 22, 1997. John Kass, Kids, System Beat Teacher Long Before Her Work Was Done, Chicago Tribune, July 24, 1997. First reported by American Renaissance in 1997.]

Just before Christmas of 1997, another black postal worker went on a shooting rampage, killing one white and wounding two others. The first man Anthony Deculit of Milwaukee shot was his supervisor, who had written him up for sleeping on the job. He then killed a white co-worker with whom he had quarreled, and shot another white before killing himself. The president of the local chapter of the NAACP says racial discrimination explains the mayhem; the employee himself is not known to have filed any race-related grievances. Post office employees have taken to shooting each other so often that the crime of killing a supervisor is now known as “going postal.” [Aaron Nathans, Motive Behind Postal Tragedy Sought, Associated Press, Dec. 19, 1997. First reported by American Renaissance in February 1998.]

In 1996, a black former football star by the name of Daniel Colwell was depressed and suicidal. As he later testified, he didn’t have the courage to kill himself so he decided to have the government do it for him. He shot a white couple to death in the parking lot of a Wal-Mart in Americus, Georgia, and turned himself in for the death penalty. During the trial he taunted jurors, telling them he would come back and torture them if they did not give him the death penalty. They obliged.

Three years later, Mr. Colwell has decided he would rather live, and wants a new trial. As he explained in a death-row letter to his lawyer, “I very much want to go to a state mental hospital to get help to save my life. I am very sorry for killing those people. I don’t want to continue to be a murderer.” He drew a smiling face next to his signature. [AP, Ga. Killer Says He Wants to Live, July 15, 1999. First reported by American Renaissance in September 1999.]

In 1999, an Ethiopian immigrant went on a rampage at work and shot two white co-workers, killing one of them, before turning the gun on himself. Negusse Zeleke was a shuttle-bus driver at the Kansas City airport, and had bounced from one job to another. In a three-page letter dated Nov. 5 he blamed his troubles on “black blood sucker supreme white people.” He wrote that problems for Africans “were created not by us, but they have created by previous colonies or today’s white supremacists evil act.” [Mo. Killer Complained of Racism, AP, Nov. 22, 1999. First reported by American Renaissance in January 2000.]

On November 8, 1999, Wesley Harris, a 27-year-old black fast food worker hijacked and kidnapped Whitney Land, a 22-year-old white woman, and her two-year-old daughter Jordan at a park in Clayton County, Georgia. Mr. Harris drove them to Gwinnett County, where he shot them at point-blank range. An autopsy showed Mr. Harris had put his gun right against the child’s face and shot her while she was still strapped into her car seat. With the help of a friend who arrived after the killings, he put the bodies in the trunk “at obscene angles,” according to press accounts, and then set the car on fire. It was not hard for police to catch Mr. Harris; he called his friend on the dead woman’s cell phone.

Mr. Harris went on trial in the fall of 2005. Gwinnett County District Attorney Danny Porter sought the death penalty and was sure he would get it. He said it was the strongest case for the death penalty he had ever tried. The trial lasted for 13 days, and the jurors took ten hours to convict Mr. Harris of first-degree murder. Some jurors said they could have reached a verdict in minutes, but wanted to go over all of the evidence “just to make sure.” Afterwards, the jurors met again for the sentence. After deliberating for an hour, they voted ten to two for the death penalty. The majority favoring the death penalty tried to persuade the other two, but they wouldn’t budge. Mr. Harris will spend the rest of his life in prison.

Jurors who voted for death are unhappy. “We’re angry that the system didn’t work and frustrated that we didn’t see the outcome we thought we should have seen,” says Denise Schneiders. “Justice wasn’t done.” Another juror adds, “I really feel like our verdict was stolen from us. We feel robbed by two people for reasons that were not really voiced.” The holdouts said only that they couldn’t vote for the death penalty. At least one juror speculated that the issue was race. The ten who voted for the death penalty were white; the two others were a black and an Asian. [Lateef Mungin, Death Sentence ‘Stolen,’ Angry Jurors Say, Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Nov. 13, 2005, p. E1. First reported by American Renaissance in March 2006.]

In 2000, in Wilkinsburg, near Philadelphia, 39-year-old Ronald Taylor killed three men and wounded two others in a rampage in which he targeted only whites. At one point, he pushed a black woman out of his way, saying “Not you, sister,” and later was reported to have said, “I’m not going to hurt any black people. I’m just out to kill all white people.” He also aimed a gun at a white woman’s head, uttered what news reports call “a racial epithet,” grabbed her wrist, and then said, “No, I think I’ll terrorize you for a while.” He did not shoot her. Police found anti-white diatribes in his apartment, which he had tried to burn down. We are not, however to leap to conclusions about Mr. Taylor’s motives. As the town’s police chief soothingly explained, “There’s a lot of anger and hostility in this individual, so I think it’s a little premature to simply define this as a racist event.” Of course. [Todd Spangler, Pa. Cops Cite Anti-White Writings, AP, March 2, 2000. Tim Molloy, Cops; Suspect’s Anger Was Simmering, AP, March 4, 2000. First reported by American Renaissance in April 2000.] At his trial in 2001, prosecutors showed that Mr. Taylor had singled out whites, even telling a black woman she was safe because he was going to shoot only whites. Mr. Taylor’s lawyers argued he was insane and suffered from delusions that whites were persecuting him, but on November 11, after deliberating for two days, a Pittsburgh jury sentenced him to death. [Shooter From Hate Spree Gets Death, AP, Nov. 12, 2001. First reported by American Renaissance in January 2002.]

Kenneth Jones, a white man in his late 30s, was looking for a seat on a Metro subway train in Washington, D.C., on the morning of September 24, 2001. He asked Clarenton Barker, who is black, if he could sit in the empty seat next to him. When Mr. Barker didn’t respond, he asked again, and then sat down. Mr. Barker then attacked Mr. Jones, hitting him repeatedly in the face. Panicked passengers called the train operator on the intercom, and the train stopped. The operator and another Metro employee entered the car to reset the emergency handle, but did not check on Mr. Jones or detain Mr. Barker. At the next station, police arrested Mr. Barker on charges of aggravated assault. Mr. Jones was taken to George Washington University Hospital where he received treatment for facial lacerations and knocked out teeth. There was a brief press account of the attack that did not mention the races of criminal or victim. [Metro Rider Accused of Onboard Assault, Washington Post, Sept. 25, 2001.] According to an AR reader who attended court hearings on the case, Mr. Jones’ injuries were more serious than reported. Witnesses said he “bled profusely,” was “covered in blood,” and was on oxygen support when he reached the hospital. Mr. Barker will not be facing justice anytime soon. It could be nine months before the Washington grand jury indicts him for felony assault. Prosecutors are not charging him with a hate crime. [First reported by American Renaissance in December 2001.]

n January 29, 2002, 16-year-old Jason Smith, a white man, was filling up at a gas station near Gadsen, South Carolina, when he was approached by two black men, one of whom asked him for five dollars. When he told the man he didn’t have the money, the man threw him to the ground and bit off the left side of his nose. Michael Dewayne Jackson, 22, was charged with first-degree assault, but Etowah County Sheriff James Hayes says he will ask the FBI to investigate the attack as a hate crime. “I’ve never seen anything like this,” he said. “This is atrocious.”

Mr. Jackson says his victim triggered the assault by making a racist remark, but Mr. Smith and other witnesses deny this. Mr. Smith must undergo a series of surgeries to reconstruct his nose. [Lisa Rogers, FBI Asked to Probe Nose-Biting Assault as Hate Crime, Gadsen Times (South Carolina), Feb. 2, 2002. First reported by American Renaissance in March 2002.]

 

Chante Mallard is a black, 25-year-old nurse’s assistant. On October 26, 2001, she crashed her car into a white pedestrian, who ended up stuck in the windshield with half his body hanging into the passenger side of the car. Miss Mallard reportedly drove to her Ft. Worth, Texas, home, parked in her garage, went into the house, and had sex with her boyfriend. The two then came out to the garage to have a look at Greg Biggs, who was still alive and stuck in the car. Miss Mallard kept the car in the garage for 48 hours, during which time she came out several times to talk to the man, who begged for help. She did nothing for him, and the man, who was homeless and suffered from mental problems, bled to death.

Miss Mallard then got her boyfriend and several friends to help her dislodge Mr. Biggs’ body and dump it in a park. Police found the body soon after, and concluded it must have been a hit-and-run case, but had no leads. Several months afterwards, Miss Mallard explained to a group of people why she was no longer driving. “I hit this white man,” she explained, and giggled. On February 25 someone who heard her say this reported it to the police. Officers found Miss Mallard’s car still in her garage, with the windshield and front seats removed, but with Mr. Biggs’ blood and hair still on it. Miss Mallard said she had burned the seats to get rid of the evidence, and planned to burn the car and buy a new one when her tax refund check arrived.

 

 

Miss Mallard was charged with murder, and was at first held on $10,000 bail at home with an electronic monitor, but prosecutors had bail raised to $250,000 to keep her in jail. Her lawyer says she is not a monster but a confused woman who was drunk and using Ecstacy when she hit Mr. Biggs, and didn’t know what she was doing. [Judge Raises Bail of Hit-Run Suspect to $250,000, AP, March 9, 2002. First reported by American Renaissance in April 2002.]

Early in the morning of June 7, 2002, Tampa Bay Devil Rays pitcher Nick Bierbrodt, on a rehabilitation assignment in Charleston, SC, was in a taxi with fellow pitcher John Vigue at the drive-through window lane of a Hardee’s restaurant. While they waited for service, they were disturbed by the loud rap music being played by a young black on a bicycle. Mr. Bierbrodt told the black to turn the music down. A few minutes later, the black rode up, pulled a gun and shot the pitcher twice in the chest. Mr. Bierbrodt was expected to recover. Charleston police were still looking for the shooter. [Marc Topkin, Bierbrodt Shot in Chest, Times (Tampa Bay), June 8, 2002, p. 1C. First reported by American Renaissance in December 2002.]

On November 16, 2002, a 29-year-old woman from Gloucestershire, England and her white South African boyfriend were driving through the picturesque mountains of the Eastern Transvaal and stopped at a scenic overlook. Five blacks came out of the bush waving a pistol. They beat the two whites, gagged them, tied them up, and threw them in the back of the car. They then drove for 14 hours around the Transvaal, stopping frequently at illegal drinking dens called shebeens. The blacks got drunker and drunker, and several times brought other drinkers out to the car to show off the two trussed-up whites. They rightly assumed no one would object or call the police. The men frequently punched and kicked the defenseless whites. At least one of the attackers raped the woman repeatedly, but they do not appear to have passed her around the shebeens. They fired the pistol several times towards the couple, once through the floor of the vehicle where they were lying.

The blacks got so drunk that at 4:00 a.m. the next morning the driver lost control and flipped the vehicle. Two passing cars stopped to help, and as one of the drivers approached, a kidnapper shot him in the head, killing him. In the confusion, the whites escaped into the darkness, and were later able to flag down a passing motorist. The police picked up the couple, and as they were driving to the police station, the whites saw two of their attackers walking along the road. Police arrested them and found one had the man’s wallet and cell phone.

Several days after her ordeal, the woman was reportedly in such a state of shock she could still not give a statement to police. Doctors were giving her drugs to combat the AIDS virus, which her attackers may well have given her. [Tim Butcher, AIDS Terror of British Tourist Raped by Gang, Telegraph (London), Nov. 19, 2002. First reported by American Renaissance in January 2003.]

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

🤗This is news. I'm happy for you peenie. 

No, no, that was many many years ago. I'm just saying that it's not uncommon to look at a home being built. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Utilit99 said:

Putting together a comprehensive list of black-on-white crime is a difficult task for two, superficially contradictory, reasons: 1) There is so much of it. 2) There is so little reporting on it. I doubt there is a day that goes by in the United States without at least dozens of instances of blacks assaulting, robbing, and/or defacing the property of whites. Yet, if all you’re reading is the New York Times, you might guess that crime of that sort takes place half a dozen times a year at most. But, if you start to dig through local news sources, and discover the code words used to discuss black crime (e.g. “youths”), the ocean of write-ups becomes overwhelming. Indeed, American Renaissance has nearly one thousand news items tagged “Black on White Crime,” while Paul Kersey has well over 3,000 blog posts about the matter.

On the evening of February 20, 1990, Robert Simon and Anthony Carr — both black — were burgling Carl Parker’s house in Lambert, in Mississippi’s Quitman County. Mr. Parker, along with three other family members — all white — arrived home to find a pickup truck loaded with loot just about to drive off. The surprised thieves held the Parker family at gun point and tied up Mr. Parker’s 12-year-old half-brother Greg and then shot him in the back. They raped and sodomized his nine-year-old half-sister Charlotte Jo before they killed her. They shot his stepmother, Bobbie Jo in the chest, and they also killed Carl Parker himself. They cut off his ring finger to get his wedding band — whether before or after they killed him is not known. Then they dragged the four bodies into Mr. Parker’s house and burned it down over them. [Allen Breed, Price of Justice Makes Poor County Even Poorer, Detroit News, March 21, 1999, p. 19A. First reported by American Renaissance in July 1999.]

 

Why are you bringing up a crime that happened in 1990????

What does black crime in general have to do with this incident? 

Since you mentioned Reginald Denny, imagine I laid out his past history or wrongdoings,  like he cut someone off in traffic or yelled a racist comment at someone. Imagine I brought up those IRRELEVANT facts in order to reduce the heinous act inflicted on him that day. Reginald's past had absolutely nothing to do with what that person did to him. Same with Ahmaud. He was running down the street and  was confronted with guns. He ran around the car and someone was there with a gun in the middle of the street! 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, peenie said:

Why are you bringing up a crime that happened in 1990????

What does black crime in general have to do with this incident? 

Since you mentioned Reginald Denny, imagine I laid out his past history or wrongdoings,  like he cut someone off in traffic or yelled a racist comment at someone. Imagine I brought up those IRRELEVANT facts in order to reduce the heinous act inflicted on him that day. Reginald's past had absolutely nothing to do with what that person did to him. Same with Ahmaud. He was running down the street and  was confronted with guns. He ran around the car and someone was there with a gun in the middle of the street! 

First of all, you don't know what was going on other than a short video. We have films about Reginald even with the guy who threw the brick into his head talking about it. We know nothing about ahmaud at this point or the other two white dudes.

And no. I'll keep going up to current day with these examples for you to look at all of black racism. You keep saying it's about poor blacks only looking for money from white people. Not the case. You said white on black crime is racism and black on white crime is simply poor black people wanting money. I'll give you 500+ more black racist crimes on whites if you want. You don't hear about these. But I don't think you want that because there are actually 10's of thousands of them.

To quote you from an earlier post you sent to me: "They are racist and YOU are racist."

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Voltaire said:

I like how you break it down here. Somewhere buried in this thread I'd done similar but you have links and actual data.

Except for the part that the “crime” isn’t a felony under GA law. I bet there are other missing pieces in the “analysis”, but I stopped there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Utilit99 said:

And now ahmaud is not breathing instead of in prison sucking other dude's cacks.

This is the best news out of the story. Less tax dollars spent putting that piece of shitt in the ground rather than feeding and housing him in prison. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Patriotsfatboy1 said:

In GA, criminal trespass is not a felony

Great, because killing the guy was ridiculous.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, peenie said:

So, because he's 25 and walked around the home he's not an innocent person, he's a bad guy?? I was in my late 30's walking around large homes in expensive neighborhoods and was never questioned nor stopped by anyone with a deadly weapon.

Never said that, and in fact have repeatedly said the opposite.  Simply pointing out a fact, the MSM manipulate people of color for ratings.....  no way did this retard deserve to be shot, or "arrested", the two goons need to be locked up

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Never said that, and in fact have repeatedly said the opposite.  Simply pointing out a fact, the MSM manipulate people of color for ratings.....  no way did this retard deserve to be shot, or "arrested", the two goons need to be locked up

Trespassing is definitely cause for arrest. It doesn't matter if it is one of the many that admitted breaking the law in this very thread or our dead friend Reggie Arbery. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, peenie said:

The poor guy is dead for walking into a home under construction and BRIEFLY looking around and you all are just pulling facts out of your ass to try to make this guy look like he deserved to be executed.

Sounds exactly like what you're doing.  You don't know that all he was doing was "...walking into a home under construction and BRIEFLY looking around...".  You're just assuming that.  None of us really know what he was doing or what he did.  None of us know what he did prior to that day.  You're blaming people for doing what you're doing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×