Jump to content
Nomad99

Kyle Rittenhouse trial

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, wiffleball said:

Anybody want to bet there's at least one Civil Trial?

Anyone can sue for practically anything.  Are you asking if we want to bet against one of the families trying to pull a money grab?  :huh: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And here is the dilemma, a Black person walking around with a gun, NOT POINTING IT AT ANYONE (this is a toy BB gun btw) is seen as a threat. He, like Tamir Rice, was not given an opportunity to drop their toy gun. I think this is a win for you guys but videos like these and of  Philando Castilo tells me that maybe I’m not safe to carry a weapon. Unlike Kyle, they’ll shoot me immediately. Mind you, Kyle killed people and the police gave him the opportunity to surrender. Not so with cases involving black men who killed NO ONE. 
 

But yes, the black men in Stone Mountain were carrying and not shot during a BLM protest. I’m truly conflicted.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 2
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, listen2me 23 said:

Holy heck you know the exact date?

I marked it on my calendar. :wub: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Anyone can sue for practically anything.  Are you asking if we want to bet against one of the families trying to pull a money grab?  :huh: 

Rhetorical. 

 

Howya feeling buddy? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I heard on a liberal radio station today that this verdict just made it legal for republicans to kill protesters. :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Utilit99 said:

 

I heard on a liberal radio station today that this verdict just made it legal for republicans to kill protesters. :lol:

Well at a minimum, if you stand on a highway in protest, I should be allowed to play bumper cars with your dumb ass.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, wiffleball said:

Rhetorical. 

 

Howya feeling buddy? 

Good thanks; actually I just started to type up an update, look for a new thread shortly.  :cheers: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Utilit99 said:

 

I heard on a liberal radio station today that this verdict just made it legal for republicans to kill protesters. :lol:

That's not true. You can be from any party you want. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, peenie said:

And here is the dilemma, a Black person walking around with a gun, NOT POINTING IT AT ANYONE (this is a toy BB gun btw) is seen as a threat. He, like Tamir Rice, was not given an opportunity to drop their toy gun. I think this is a win for you guys but videos like these and of  Philando Castilo tells me that maybe I’m not safe to carry a weapon. Unlike Kyle, they’ll shoot me immediately. Mind you, Kyle killed people and the police gave him the opportunity to surrender. Not so with cases involving black men who killed NO ONE.

Ever see one of those reports where a hidden camera shows a black woman in a jewelry store getting less attention than a similarly dressed white woman? Implication being - the store worker is racist. They don't bother showing that if a Muslim dressed as a oil sheik walked in, he'd get better service than anyone. It's all about perception, not racism.

So when an armed black man is treated differently by a cop, do ya think it's because the cop is racist and full of hate? Or is it based on the perception of danger knowing blacks commit the vast majority of violent crime?

I'm not saying it's right, just not racist in the sense of being hateful.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, GobbleDog said:

Ever see one of those reports where a hidden camera shows a black woman in a jewelry store getting less attention than a similarly dressed white woman? Implication being - the store worker is racist. They don't bother showing that if a Muslim dressed as a oil sheik walked in, he'd get better service than anyone. It's all about perception, not racism.

So when an armed black man is treated differently by a cop, do ya think it's because the cop is racist and full of hate? Or is it based on the perception of danger knowing blacks commit the vast majority of violent crime?

I'm not saying it's right, just not racist in the sense of being hateful.

I am not blaming police officers. I know why they have fears, I’m just saying, based on that reality I’d be talking a risk by feeling confident to carry a weapon. 
Just last year a security guard was killed while he was apprehending a criminal because he was black. 
I think it is easier for police to stop and perform the proper checks before firing their weapon than expecting all black criminals to one day become model citizens so policemen don’t fear us.

And unfortunately, there are racist police officers that still can be heard calling Black people the n-word on the body cam. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TheNewGirl said:

They do now 

Biden has been in some kind of office for over 40 years and he's rich. Pretty sure elected officials don't get paid THAT much. 

Filthy rich. Not bad for a middle class kid who graduated last in his class who married a teacher and has been doing government work the whole time. Somehow his family got stinking rich too. They’re a bigger bunch of lazy leeches than him. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, peenie said:

And here is the dilemma, a Black person walking around with a gun, NOT POINTING IT AT ANYONE (this is a toy BB gun btw) is seen as a threat. He, like Tamir Rice, was not given an opportunity to drop their toy gun. I think this is a win for you guys but videos like these and of  Philando Castilo tells me that maybe I’m not safe to carry a weapon. Unlike Kyle, they’ll shoot me immediately. Mind you, Kyle killed people and the police gave him the opportunity to surrender. Not so with cases involving black men who killed NO ONE. 
 

But yes, the black men in Stone Mountain were carrying and not shot during a BLM protest. I’m truly conflicted.

Now do Da’ baby

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, GobbleDog said:

Ever see one of those reports where a hidden camera shows a black woman in a jewelry store getting less attention than a similarly dressed white woman? Implication being - the store worker is racist. They don't bother showing that if a Muslim dressed as a oil sheik walked in, he'd get better service than anyone. It's all about perception, not racism.

So when an armed black man is treated differently by a cop, do ya think it's because the cop is racist and full of hate? Or is it based on the perception of danger knowing blacks commit the vast majority of violent crime?

I'm not saying it's right, just not racist in the sense of being hateful.

Great post. They just won’t admit they have an out of proportion violent crime problem and think everyone should act as if they don’t, becisse liberals who need their vote and use them as a shield can’t  acknowledge it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It5pprg.gif.584071d6859b0595952bc3fc2d539af8.gif

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Carlton Dance.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Gladiators said:

Has the great LeFlop weighed in yet?

He's too busy looking for the Chinese Tennis star.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Strike said:

He's too busy looking for the Chinese Tennis star.

I wonder how long they let him wander around Chinatown in LA looking for her. I should give that idea to babylonbee.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

This fat and worthless POS...he's regurgitating the prosecutors lies that got him found not guilty.

  

 

Has this been flagged as misinformation?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’d just like to say to pimpadoosh, Sean Looney, MDC, Wiffleball and the rest of the libtards: Don’t worry, I can guarantee there will be other pedpohiles and other scumbags that get killed and you can mourn and seek justice for them as well.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, shorepatrol said:

Have the riots started yet? It's gotta be dark in Kenosha now. 

I am wondering the same. They have to all be out of bed by now, right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, shorepatrol said:

Have the riots started yet? It's gotta be dark in Kenosha now. 

As someone who grew up in Kenosha county, Wisconsin,  if it was me....and I'm as liberal as they get....I'd still be more inclined to be drinking now than rioting. I mean being liberal is one thing, but it's Friday, there is beer that needs to be drunk!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Mid fifties. If that’s old so be it. Don’t watch that O one. Just Tucker and Guttfeld on Fox. Some Jessie Waters.  So you’re a libtard with no real world experience? Just academics? You probably watch Maddiow, Hayes and Lawrence O’Donnell every night. I used to too.  Then I woke up.  You’re still sleeping. 

Have you seen their ratings? No one watches them. I don't watch TV news. It's more opinion than anything and I don't need to listen to what some dork with glasses or some bow tie wearing says to know what to think. Sorry you do. Maybe turn it off and read for yourself. It would certainly help your comprehension skills. 

14 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

I’d just lie to say to pimpadoosh, Sean Looney, MDC, Wiffleball and the rest of the libtards: Don’t worry, I can guarantee there will be other pedpohiles and other scumbags that get killed and you can mourn and seek justice for them as well.  

Please find where I mourned the death of any of the people involved in this. I'll wait. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is how a President should act in these situations.

 

 

Quote

 

President Joe Biden said Friday he stands by the not-guilty verdict in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial, saying the jury system of trial in the United States works and must be respected.

"Look, I stand by what the jury has concluded," he said. "The jury system works, and we have to abide by it.".....
 
Biden also encouraged protesters to "express their views peacefully, consistent with the rule of law."
"Violence and destruction of property have no place in our democracy," the statement adds.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

Have you seen their ratings? No one watches them. I don't watch TV news. It's more opinion than anything and I don't need to listen to what some dork with glasses or some bow tie wearing says to know what to think. Sorry you do. Maybe turn it off and read for yourself. It would certainly help your comprehension skills. 

Please find where I mourned the death of any of the people involved in this. I'll wait. 

It was subtle, but it was there. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/3/2021 at 7:12 PM, 5-Points said:

The rifle wasn't illegal. His possession of it wasn't illegal. His use of it in self defense wasn't illegal. 

This guy knows stuff.  :thumbsup:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, 5-Points said:

This guy knows stuff.  :thumbsup:

 

Nice work.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

This is how a President should act in these situations.

 

 

 

Except you left out the part preceding that where Biden said he was angered and concerned by the verdict.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Gepetto said:

Except you left out the part preceding that where Biden said he was angered and concerned by the verdict.

"will leave many Americans feeling angry and concerned, myself included." He said that everyone "must acknowledge that the jury has spoken."

 

concerned could mean a few things there but either way- the bigger point is his larger message to people is "Deal with it, this is the system we have and it works." The previous guy would've said "Cry and whine and yell until you get your way"- essentially.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Gepetto said:

Except you left out the part preceding that where Biden said he was angered and concerned by the verdict.

And how last year Biden implied that Rittenhouse was a white supremacist. Biden is worthless.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×