Jump to content
JustinCharge

Trump very likely to win 2020 election thru court challenge - Rutgers law professor

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, FlyinHeadlock said:

We have a long history of judges not getting involved in elections. Truth is this is a referendum on the people plain and simple. Not judges.

 

The SC has just changed.  It is now 6-3.  That gives the SC a conservative mandate.  We are now looking at conservative activism.  This court will now legislate from the bench in favor of conservatives.  And I think a good place to start is getting these corrupt ballot counting practices in line.  And they can do that by making it clear that the state legislatures are allowed to send whichever set of electors they want if they deem fraud has occurred.

All of the old stuff where it was always balanced 5-4 no longer applies the moment Amy sat down.

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, MDC said:

 If there is actual voter fraud I hope they uncover it.

All I'm asking for. I ate 8 years of Obama winning fair. I'll eat 4 years of Biden. I'm not a tinfoil guy. If there isn't concrete evidence of massive voter fraud, I'll stomach 4 years of Biden. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, FlyinHeadlock said:

This is how Democrats play football:

 

 

Exactly. That’s clearly a penalty but the officials may prove be too cowardly to throw the flag.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, shorepatrol said:

All I'm asking for. I ate 8 years of Obama winning fair. I'll eat 4 years of Biden. I'm not a tinfoil guy. If there isn't concrete evidence of massive voter fraud, I'll stomach 4 years of Biden. 

That is not the attitude of the new GOP.  This GOP is populist.  This new breed is like the revolutionaries in 1776.  Those guys did things like try to bait redcoats into firing at them to gain public support, guerrilla warfare, etc. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, JustinCharge said:

The SC has just changed.  It is now 6-3.  That gives the SC a conservative mandate.  We are now looking at conservative activism.  This court will now legislate from the bench in favor of conservatives.  And I think a good place to start is getting these corrupt ballot counting practices in line.  And they can do that by making it clear that the state legislatures are allowed to send whichever set of electors they want if they deem fraud has occurred.

They won't do it. Adam Durshowitz explained it on Newsmax. Only if it's some instance where the vote could be overturned with evidence. Basically something that is fact but the state will not budge on correcting it or the evidence is close to certain as it gets. Look how they created almost this perfect gap, just about the right size in all these states to make it seem futile. Some poll workers are coming forward on the fraud but by that time it's too late. They should have stopped at that point, pulled the fire alarm whatever. They did nothing when they could have. That is what I'm talking about. Nobody said anything until it was way too late.

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, FlyinHeadlock said:

They won't do it. Adam Durshowitz explained it on Newsmax. Only if it's some instance where the vote could be overturned with evidence. Basically something that is fact but the state will not budge on correcting it or the evidence is close to certain as it gets. Look how they created almost this perfect gap, just about the right size in all these states to make it seem futile. Some poll workers are coming forward on the fraud but by that time it's too late. They should have stopped at that point, pulled the fire alarm whatever. They did nothing when they could have. That is what I'm talking about. Nobody said anything until it was way too late.

Oh it is going to happen.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/6/2020 at 5:31 PM, Frozenbeernuts said:

If you really want a civil war, then give Trump the presidency through the courts even if Biden wins originally

but Biden hasn't won, and isn't going to.

And I'd say the opposite, if somehow Biden gets in like this........then the real $h!t hits the fan

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Again, Kavanaugh literally spelled out exactly how this is going to go down.  The media is just ignoring it.  You guys have Dershowitz or your own opinions.  I'm looking at what the actual supreme court justices are saying.  And they are not in agreement with you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, wiffleball said:

F ing loon. Lol

 

4 minutes ago, JustinCharge said:

Oh it is going to happen.

I hope you are right. I truly do. They better do something. They are underestimating how infuriated people are. This isn't some stupid investigation stuff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, JustinCharge said:

We are now looking at conservative activism. 

That may be the dumbest sh!t I've ever read. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/6/2020 at 4:31 PM, Frozenbeernuts said:

If you really want a civil war, then give Trump the presidency through the courts even if Biden wins originally

the civil war started months ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The elites think they can create civil unrest and then with a snap of their fingers wish it away.  Now we have marches and protests going on by the Trump supporters every day.  This thing is already beyond their control.  It isn't going to stop if Trump concedes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

🤪

Good sense, innocence, cripplin' mankind

Dead kings, many things I can't define

Who cares what games we choose.  Little to win but nothing to lose.

 

To divide this cockeyed world in two
Throw your pride to one side, it's the least you can do
Beatniks and politics, nothing is new
A yardstick for lunatics, one point of view

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Big Guy said:

but Biden hasn't won, and isn't going to.

And I'd say the opposite, if somehow Biden gets in like this........then the real $h!t hits the fan

A civil war would give you a good excuse to go over and level the party house.  🤔

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For those claiming "no evidence", exactly what are you looking for to slap you right in the face when this thing hasn't been dug into? Yall need some hard evidence like a pee-pee tape?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

For those claiming "no evidence", exactly what are you looking for to slap you right in the face when this thing hasn't been dug into? Yall need some hard evidence like a pee-pee tape?

If Nancy Pelosi announced on live television that the Democrat party rigged this election for Joe Biden through their cheat by mail scheme, these idiots still wouldn't admit that voter fraud is an issue. 

Their guy "won." That's all that matters. 

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, 5-Points said:

If Nancy Pelosi announced on live television that the Democrat party rigged this election for Joe Biden through their cheat by mail scheme, these idiots still wouldn't admit that voter fraud is an issue. 

Their guy "won." That's all that matters. 

 

💯

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Man, people are stupid. I just read the Schumer said if the Democrats win the Senate, they will “Change America”. I don’t believe even the majority of Biden voters are for this but the idiots votes for him anyway because OMB. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Boots11234 said:

Man, people are stupid. I just read the Schumer said if the Democrats win the Senate, they will “Change America”. I don’t believe even the majority of Biden voters are for this but the idiots votes for him anyway because OMB. 

Yeah, people didn't vote for Trump because OMB, but they are perfectly content voting for the party that is currently compiling "lists" of Trump supporters so they can be ridiculed and prevent them from having gainful employment. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Mookz said:

A civil war would give you a good excuse to go over and level the party house.  🤔

The bad part is the residents are made up of Antifa / BLM as well as the entire cast of Ozark.

I guess Drugs bring people together

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure if this has been posted. Anon did a data analysis of the voting patterns and you can see in real time when they started mixing in the biden ballots.

https://files.catbox.moe/xayycy.gif

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

I'm not sure what this means. Can you explain? Is that a sign of shenanigans?

Did you say shenanigans?

These graphs are tracking mail-in ballots. A deck of cards has black and red cards. Let's change the black cards to blue for simplicity. Obviously blue = Dem red = Rep.

You give out cards to friends throughout the state and have them mail them to you. What you're seeing in these graphs is the first day you get a very nice distribution. Some Red and some blue. But the next day you get more blue than red. Then over the next couple days it's pretty much all blue cards. You should expect to see some red cards because the cards essentially get shuffled at the post office you should get a mix of red and blue every day. Instead, all you get are blue cards.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if Cdub will be able to figure out what he missed and why his post is so wrong. :lol:

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, fandandy said:

I saw that tweet and I thought, Really?  A landscaping company?  After actually seeing this, holy crap Trump.  WTF are they thinking?  Would no one else allow them on their property?

? It’s Philadelphia. Most of that city is a third world shithole. It’s not like they had a lot to choose from. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

? It’s Philadelphia. Most of that city is a third world shithole. It’s not like they had a lot to choose from. 

Indeed. Not much else to choose from. A cigarette factory, payday loan or a liquor store.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Big Guy said:

The bad part is the residents are made up of Antifa / BLM as well as the entire cast of Ozark.

I guess Drugs bring people together

Get the phone number if you can. We can have some fun 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, OldMaid said:

I wonder if Cdub will be able to figure out what he missed and why his post is so wrong. :lol:

Well, for one, he should have taken the joker out of the deck instead of voting for him.

As for what he missed, I'm guessing basic math and statistics classes.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Mike Honcho said:

Well, for one, he should have taken the joker out of the deck instead of voting for him.

🤣👍🏻

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, OldMaid said:

🤣👍🏻

Do you guys care to explain where he's wrong?

or is this where we just make fun of someone for posting something and declare it's wrong without actually providing any proof that it's wrong?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Do you guys care to explain where he's wrong?

or is this where we just make fun of someone for posting something and declare it's wrong without actually providing any proof that it's wrong?

What could possibly be different about the number of red/"blue" cards in a deck and the number of red/blue mail in ballots? I guarantee you the ratio is not equal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The MSM sure has allowed the floodgates to open with people declaring that we have the "first elected woman as VP".  And "President elect Biden". The more this narrative is pushed, the fewer people pay attention to the unexplained anomalies with the election. Trump has every right to the legal avenues he is exploring. To see how outwardly manipulative the MSM is, sickens me more than the thought of Camel-a as POTUS.  The average John Q Citizen will have no advocates soon.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×