Jump to content
KSB2424

Nothing on the Texas School shooting?

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

who said that?

You can see that is what Fireballer is going for. 

He will say he isn't. He is lying. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Sean Mooney said:

You can see that is what Fireballer is going for. 

He will say he isn't. He is lying. 

the left loves the destruction of the nuclear family thats a fact

he didn't say that makes the shooters a leftist

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

the left loves the destruction of the nuclear family thats a fact

he didn't say that makes the shooters a leftist

The first comment is stupid.

Which is why the assumption he is making with the second sentence is dumber. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

The first comment is stupid.

Which is why the assumption he is making with the second sentence is dumber. 

the left supports BLM

BLM is a marxist organization that wants to destroy the nuclear family

promoting "toxic masculinity" is anti family

promoting welfare instead of marriage is anti family

promoting abortion instead of personal responsibility is anti family

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

There is surveillance footage reportedly that shows that a teacher did not leave the door propped open and shut it behind her once she heard gunshots. She saw the crash and got her phone to call for help when the guy started shooting at people. 

Interesting.  So looks like it was propped open initially, but was shut when the teacher realized there was a shooter, but the door failed to lock as it should.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/texas-police-teacher-closed-propped-open-door-attack-85093476?fbclid=IwAR0ytss18Ifsr2waRJsIt5W0P26uGPAVoWJVw10PgQhnubhK5RPQfYljiTI&fs=e&s=cl

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

the left supports BLM

BLM is a marxist organization that wants to destroy the nuclear family

promoting "toxic masculinity" is anti family

promoting welfare instead of marriage is anti family

promoting abortion instead of personal responsibility is anti family

 

this is all stupid the conclusions you are drawing. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

You can see that is what Fireballer is going for. 

He will say he isn't. He is lying. 

Show me where I said all school shooters are left leaning politically.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

this is all stupid the conclusions you are drawing. 

You just never quit. You drew an astute conclusion from my post.  But everyone else draws stupid  conclusions. I'll give you an A for consistency.  You never stop trying to suck your own dik.  I hope you don't think anyone here takes you seriously. 

  • Thanks 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, 5-Points said:

Most Midwest and Eastern schools are indoor, no? Those would seem to be easy to harden. 

The schools in the South and West would be a little more difficult but it's completely feasible. 

$40 Billion could've done it easily. 

Moreso that trying to confiscate 400 million guns. And don't fool yourself, that is the end game for Dems. 

Wait, what... schools in the south and west are outdoors?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Big Guy said:

trickle trickle.......looks like it's another False Flag just like many of us suspected.....

https://gab.com/SwampNugget/posts/108398360292148047

. As everyone knows, in Michigan we had a plan unearthed to kidnap Governor Halfwit. It turned out it wasn't much of a plot; half the conspirators, including the driver and the explosives expert, were FBI agents who sought to entramp the dimbulb half. So, it stands to reason that the toxic websites where psychotic teens go to have d*ck measuring contests with each other would get similarly monitored. Obviously, it didn't help much in this case.

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

Wait, what... schools in the south and west are outdoors?

The connections between buildings, the "hallways" if you will, are often outdoors here in Phoenix.  I would guess that the campuses are still all fenced in, at least the ones I can think of, but I don't know for sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, jerryskids said:

The connections between buildings, the "hallways" if you will, are often outdoors here in Phoenix.  I would guess that the campuses are still all fenced in, at least the ones I can think of, but I don't know for sure.

Hmm... thanks. Now I got you, that makes sense. The ones here in China are this way (the Phoenix way described above) too with the hallways outside. The campuses are pretty dang secure though, the one gate is permanently locked, there's only one entrance in-and-out with a handful of security guards there. Plus, when school is starting or letting out, they also get local police support mulling around as parents drop off/pick up their kids. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Sean Mooney said:

So all school shooters are left leaning politically? That's what people really want to argue?

It's not about the shooters politics.  The problem is people and politicians on the left and their stupid "solutions".

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Following the shooting, Gov. Greg Abbott immediately started beating the 'mental health' drum... Since then, he's gone silent on it. The Gov hopes you all keep debating propped open doors and politics - anything to steer the convo away from mental health... Why? 

Abbott said the shooter had a 'mental health' issue. A month ago, he slashed funding to help. (yahoo.com)

Oops.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Sean Mooney said:

You can see that is what Fireballer is going for. 

He will say he isn't. He is lying. 

 

6 hours ago, Fireballer said:

Show me where I said all school shooters are left leaning politically.  

Called it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Fireballer said:

You just never quit. You drew an astute conclusion from my post.  But everyone else draws stupid  conclusions. I'll give you an A for consistency.  You never stop trying to suck your own dik.  I hope you don't think anyone here takes you seriously. 

Do you realize the irony of your stupid comments?

4 hours ago, Gepetto said:

It's not about the shooters politics.  The problem is people and politicians on the left and their stupid "solutions".

The right has stupid solutions too. You all need to stop thinking it is just the "left".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Sean Mooney said:

So all school shooters are left leaning politically? That's what people really want to argue?

Apparently you do. I haven't seen anybody else make that argument. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Fireballer said:

Destruction of the nuclear family creates many, many break downs in society. The only solution the left wants is more top-down authoritative control.  Hmmmm.....🤔

:thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Voltaire said:

Wait, what... schools in the south and west are outdoors?

Sorry. Much of the campuses out here are outdoors with classrooms/gyms etc. being the only indoor portion. So if the kids aren't in class, they are typically outside. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, jerryskids said:

Pretty much every pistol, and every non-bolt action rifle or shotgun, is "semi-automatic".  It might have been said already, but have you thought about what you feel has no legitimate self defense purpose?  The scary sounding AR thingies?  :dunno:

I’m not a gun owner and obviously don’t know a lot about them. Seems to me we should consider a ban on these military style weapons that serve no self defense or hunting purpose but figure often in mass shootings. 

Universal background checks are also overdue. :thumbsup: 

9 hours ago, jerryskids said:

@MDC thinks it's egregious to ask teachers to not prop open back doors to go out to their cars for a drink or to get high.  The better solution is to eliminate practically all weapons and become Canada.  :thumbsup: 

I haven’t heard about this propped door thing. New talking point you guys are all trying out at the same time?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

 

promoting "toxic masculinity" is anti family

 

You have no idea what you're talking about

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, GutterBoy said:

You have no idea what you're talking about

Since you like the phrase and have used it here before.  What exactly does it mean? Or what is your definition of "toxic masculinity"?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, listen2me 23 said:

Since you like the phrase and have used it here before.  What exactly does it mean? Or what is your definition of "toxic masculinity"?

A set of behaviors ascribed to boys and young men that dictate how men should behave, like not showing emotion, not having feelings, acting out physically, treating women like objects, disrespecting others, etc.  Toxic behavior that has nothing to do with being a man.

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Sean Mooney said:

 

Called it.

You're so clever.  Unbelievable.  You called me out on playing your own stupid "show me" game.  Shall we continue? Show me where I said all school shooters are left leaning.  You can't because you drew stupid conclusions while thinking you're some robust dynamic thinker.  Stay in the classroom, teach.  The real world is eating you up.  Can a get a grammar check?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

A set of behaviors ascribed to boys and young men that dictate how men should behave, like not showing emotion, not having feelings, acting out physically, treating women like objects, disrespecting others, etc.  Toxic behavior that has nothing to do with being a man.

So can there be toxic femininity?  You know, sluts, gold diggers, treating men like objects, acting out emotionally?

And if so why do we need the labels?   What is it with you people and labels?  We already call men who use women...womanizers.  What is the point of more labels? Just extra hard virtue signaling?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For the record I did not give you the laughing gace as I don't use emojis.  But I did find you post funny as well but thr above is a serious question.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And it is really ironic that in 2022 "toxic masculinity" is pointed out as a problem.  In an era where men are more feminized than ever.  Where people girls guys and its are more emotional than ever.  Where everyone is hopped up on happy pills jist to get them through a day.  

Really ironic.  

Meanwhile a day after this tragedy my Grandfather who is 90 said..."what is wrong with people these days, in my younger years no one would have even imagined doing things like this". You know in a time when men were actually men and this "toxic masculinity" you talk about must have been 10x as high as it is today.  

Ironic.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, MDC said:

. Seems to me we should consider a ban on these military style weapons that serve no self defense or hunting purpose 

This is getting good now. If we ban anything, we need nuanced language in a law. Care to elaborate?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MDC said:

 

I haven’t heard about this propped door thing. New talking point you guys are all trying out at the same time?

Did you read the beginning of this thread?  Much of the GC was jumping on the blaming the teacher bandwagon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, listen2me 23 said:

So can there be toxic femininity?  You know, sluts, gold diggers, treating men like objects, acting out emotionally?

And if so why do we need the labels?   What is it with you people and labels?  We already call men who use women...womanizers.  What is the point of more labels? Just extra hard virtue signaling?

Is it the name that bothers you?  Call it anything else, the name is unimportant.  It's the behavior that is the problem.  Do you think that these stereoytypical masculine behaviors are good? (Not showing emotion, acting in anger/violence, womanizing, etc)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, listen2me 23 said:

For the record I did not give you the laughing gace as I don't use emojis.  But I did find you post funny as well but thr above is a serious question.   

It is sad that you laugh at a serious problem with men in this country.  But I get it, I laughed too when I first started learning about it, I wrote it off as touchy feely BS, but as I learned more it all clicked for me, maybe it will for you some day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Showing emotion. Ugh. 

Exactly.  Men aren't supposed to show emotion, right?  We're supposed to suck it up.  Feeling sad?  Have a drink.  Feel insecure, go bang some broad.  Feel unsure about yourself, go beat someone up.  That's how to be a man, right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Fireballer said:

This is getting good now. If we ban anything, we need nuanced language in a law. Care to elaborate?

We get it.  You guys know a lot about guns.  This conversation was already had yesterday.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, listen2me 23 said:

And it is really ironic that in 2022 "toxic masculinity" is pointed out as a problem.  In an era where men are more feminized than ever.  Where people girls guys and its are more emotional than ever.  Where everyone is hopped up on happy pills jist to get them through a day.  

Really ironic.  

Meanwhile a day after this tragedy my Grandfather who is 90 said..."what is wrong with people these days, in my younger years no one would have even imagined doing things like this". You know in a time when men were actually men and this "toxic masculinity" you talk about must have been 10x as high as it is today.  

Ironic.

It was "pointed out" several years ago, and it's ignorant to attribute the problems young men face today by being "soft".  Ignorant and Ironic.

Do you think this kid that murdered 20 kids was soft?  He was too feminine?  Too much of a puzzy, because a soft puzzy buys guns and murders kids, right?

Or maybe it was the fact that he felt like he needed to be someone he wasn't, he couldn't talk to anyone about how he felt for fear or shame, so he did what society tells him is masculine, he bought a bunch of guns, posted them online, talked about how tough he is, and then in his final bid to be a man, he murdered 20 kids.

Oh and if your grandfather had easy access to weapons and the pressures of social media, it would have been much worse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×