And when the actual President of the USA puts out a bitcoin that his company is a primary investor in with other investors, including international ones, by a factor of 1000x more value, what is that called?
Just to respond appropriately, and I’ve read the piece.
You see this sort of complaint from the liberal side. When a book by a Woodward or Bolton comes out long after the information would have been useful, & they’ll say ‘oh now you tell us!’
But in the end the fault 100% lies with Biden. His time to get out was 2022, he would have been respected as a placeholder president. Instead, as he won and won well in 2020 his hubris told him he’d win again. In general his presidency, while very professionally & competently run, which is what he offered the electorate, lacked the urgency to match the issues he often talked about. We needed a Kennedy or Truman or Reagan, & we got maybe Coolidge or Ford, though really all past US comps fail in this era.
Damn right I voted for it. Sorry you are going broke and your version of things are grossly inaccurate. But, Darwin and all.... No need for me to pay your way. I don't want to because you are better at pulling people back to your lows in life, than building people up to succeed. You can stay where you are in life voting for the scum of scum. That's fine with me. Your divisive hey day is over now that obama and creepy joe have been pushed aside for good.
Good luck though peenie. You'll need it.
I just skimmed it. Don't see the name of the "reporter" listed. So looks like another "anonymous source" and from a Facebook post. Come on man post a real article or GTFOH with that weak sauce
Biden was wrong for trying to run it back, especially after he told Americans he would be a transitional president. I also doubt Kamala would have been the nominee had a true primary been undertaken.
The key difference being Dems don’t have a cult figure that leads them. Frankly it would have been a tough road for any Dem, because no candidate would have received the fervent, unquestioned support like Republicans currently have. We’ll see what happens in 2028 when Republicans have no choice but to choose another candidate.
Here's the meeting. You don't need anonymous WH reporters with agendas to tell you what to think, like the OP does. You can see it for yourself and make up your own mind.
Figure it out for yourselves. I likely won't have time to watch it.
There is a third option where they agree that such participation is inexcusable. Instead we get folks like @Sean Mooneysaying that he has daughters, but he doesn't care about this issue until we solve women's health, world hunger, and climate change.
Right, just like they ruined LT, Banks, Carson, Bavaro, Joe Morris, Phil Simms, Eli, Hakeem Knicks, Victor Cruz, Shockey, not to mention current Giant All-Pros Dexter Lawrence and Andrew Thomas. Good Call,...
My best option trades in choppy markets have been selling out of the money puts on stocks I want to own. That way either I collect the premium and move on, or I get to own the stock for substantially less than it is today, where I already value it.
Who's "we"?
And no it's not ok with parents playing God with their kids' sex. It should not be any adults choice to fock with a kid like that. '
You are one sick little man.
I don’t recall things being all that cheap when trump was president, wasn’t under trump that in 2020 American closed down, and people lots things, little things like homes?
More bullshit. I've challenged several people to find a SINGLE post in which someone states support for men in women's sports and sure enough, nobody (not you) has.
The point of scoffing at the threads is that Maxipad, among others, spams the hell out of the forum with them so they can be bigoted asses about it. They act as though this is the biggest crisis we've ever faced, which is beyond absurd. If you're looking for a strawman, you constructed one of your own.